Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Communicable Disease Centre, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056844. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
In England, during pandemic 2009 H1N1, vaccine efficacy and immunogenicity population studies in priority groups were rolled out in parallel to evaluate the pandemic vaccination programme. This provided a unique opportunity to compare immunogenicity and clinical protection in the same population and thus provide insights into the correlates of protection for the pandemic H1N1 2009 vaccine in risk groups. While clinical protection from AS03-adjuvanted pandemic 2009 H1N1 vaccine was high in those aged <25 years and pregnant women, effectiveness in older adults with chronic conditions has been found to be surprisingly poor. Here we present results from the immunogenicity study derived from the same population. Individuals from priority groups eligible for pandemic vaccination attending participating general practices were recruited. Pre and post-vaccination blood samples were collected and HI antibody testing to assess immune response to vaccination performed. The final cohort consisted of 610 individuals: 60 healthy children aged <5 years; 32 healthy pregnant women; 518 individuals from risk groups. Seroconversion rate in healthy children aged <5 years (87%, 95% CI: 75% to 94%) was higher than that of risk groups combined (65%, 95% CI: 61% to 69%) (p<0.001). Multivariable analysis of risk groups showed that the size of response in those who did seroconvert was lower in those who received the 2009/10 seasonal TIV (Fold effect: 0.52, 0.35 to 0.78). Predicted immunological boosting from higher pre-vaccine titres after 2009 pandemic H1N1 vaccination only occurred in children (seroconversion rate = 92%) and not in individuals aged 10 to 39 from risk groups (seroconversion rate = 74%). The lack of clinical protection identified in the same population in older adults from risk groups could be attributed to these lower seroresponses. Current immunogenicity licensing criteria for pandemic influenza vaccine may not correlate with clinical protection in individuals with chronic disease or immunocompromised.
在英国,2009 年 H1N1 大流行期间,针对优先人群的疫苗效力和免疫原性人群研究同时展开,以评估大流行疫苗接种计划。这为在同一人群中比较免疫原性和临床保护提供了独特的机会,从而深入了解高危人群对 2009 年 H1N1 大流行流感疫苗的保护相关性。虽然在年龄<25 岁的人群和孕妇中,含 AS03 佐剂的大流行 2009 年 H1N1 疫苗具有较高的临床保护作用,但在患有慢性疾病的老年人中,其有效性却令人惊讶地低。在此,我们介绍了来自同一人群的免疫原性研究结果。符合大流行疫苗接种条件的优先人群在参加研究的常规医疗实践中招募。在接种疫苗前后采集血样,并进行 HI 抗体检测,以评估疫苗接种后的免疫反应。最终队列包括 610 名个体:60 名年龄<5 岁的健康儿童;32 名健康孕妇;518 名来自高危人群的个体。年龄<5 岁的健康儿童的血清转化率(87%,95%CI:75%至 94%)高于高危人群的血清转化率(65%,95%CI:61%至 69%)(p<0.001)。对高危人群进行多变量分析显示,在血清转化率方面,接种 2009/10 季节性 TIV 的个体的反应幅度较低(效果倍数:0.52,0.35 至 0.78)。2009 年大流行 H1N1 疫苗接种后较高的疫苗前滴度仅在儿童中预测出免疫增强作用(血清转化率=92%),而在高危人群中年龄为 10 至 39 岁的个体中则未观察到这种作用(血清转化率=74%)。在高危人群的老年成年人中,观察到的临床保护缺失可能归因于这些较低的血清应答。当前大流行性流感疫苗的免疫原性许可标准可能与慢性疾病或免疫功能低下个体的临床保护无关。