• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Focused open necrosectomy in necrotizing pancreatitis.聚焦性胰腺坏死组织清除术治疗坏死性胰腺炎。
HPB (Oxford). 2013 Jul;15(7):535-40. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12004. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
2
Comparison between minimally invasive and open surgical treatment in necrotizing pancreatitis.坏死性胰腺炎的微创与开放手术治疗对比
J Surg Res. 2017 Apr;210:22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.10.022. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
3
A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome.对于坏死性胰腺炎,采取保守和微创的方法可以改善预后。
Gastroenterology. 2011 Oct;141(4):1254-63. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.06.073. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
4
Is necrosectomy obsolete for infected necrotizing pancreatitis? Is a paradigm shift needed?坏死组织切除术对于感染性坏死性胰腺炎是否过时了?是否需要范式转变?
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 7;20(45):16925-34. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.16925.
5
Factors associated with mortality in patients with infected pancreatic necrosis: the "surgery effect".感染性胰腺坏死患者死亡的相关因素:“手术效应”。
Updates Surg. 2020 Dec;72(4):1097-1103. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00764-z. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
6
Early (<4 Weeks) Versus Standard (≥ 4 Weeks) Endoscopically Centered Step-Up Interventions for Necrotizing Pancreatitis.早期(<4 周)与标准(≥4 周)内镜下集中式升阶梯干预坏死性胰腺炎。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct;113(10):1550-1558. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0232-3. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
7
Surgical management of necrotizing pancreatitis: an overview.坏死性胰腺炎的外科治疗:综述
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 21;20(43):16106-12. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16106.
8
Minimally invasive necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis.感染性坏死性胰腺炎的微创坏死组织清除术
Pancreas. 2008 Mar;36(2):113-9. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181514c9e.
9
Better Outcomes if Percutaneous Drainage Is Used Early and Proactively in the Course of Necrotizing Pancreatitis.在坏死性胰腺炎病程中早期且积极地采用经皮引流可取得更好的治疗效果。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Mar;27(3):418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.11.054. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
Single or multiport percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy performed with the patient under conscious sedation is a safe and effective treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis (with video).在清醒镇静下对患者进行单孔或多孔经皮内镜坏死组织清除术是治疗感染性胰腺坏死的一种安全有效的方法(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Feb;81(2):351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.060. Epub 2014 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined totally mini-invasive approach in necrotizing pancreatitis: a case report and systematic literature review.联合微创方法治疗坏死性胰腺炎:病例报告和系统文献回顾。
World J Emerg Surg. 2017 Mar 16;12:16. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0126-5. eCollection 2017.
2
Early Spontaneous Abdominal Bleeding is associated with Poor Outcome in Moderate to Severe Acute Pancreatitis Patients: A Propensity Matched Study.早期自发性腹腔出血与中重度急性胰腺炎患者预后不良相关:一项倾向匹配研究。
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 22;7:42607. doi: 10.1038/srep42607.
3
Safety of direct endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with gastric varices.胃静脉曲张患者直接内镜下坏死组织切除术的安全性
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May 25;8(10):402-8. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i10.402.
4
Routine use of U-tube drainage for necrotizing pancreatitis: a step toward less morbidity and resource utilization.U形管引流在坏死性胰腺炎中的常规应用:迈向降低发病率和资源利用的一步。
Surgery. 2015 Oct;158(4):919-26; discussion 926-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
5
Spontaneous bleeding in pancreatitis treated by transcatheter arterial coil embolization: a retrospective study.经导管动脉弹簧圈栓塞治疗胰腺炎自发性出血:一项回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 20;8(8):e72903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072903. eCollection 2013.

本文引用的文献

1
Classical, minimally invasive necrosectomy or percutaneous drainage in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Does changing the order of the factors change the result?急性坏死性胰腺炎的传统微创坏死组织清除术或经皮引流术。改变因素的顺序会改变结果吗?
JOP. 2010 Jul 5;11(4):415-7.
2
Improving the treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis--a step up.改善坏死性胰腺炎的治疗——向前迈进了一步。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1535-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1001835.
3
A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis.升阶梯治疗策略或开腹清创术治疗坏死性胰腺炎。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1491-502. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908821.
4
Laparoscopic endogastric and transgastric cystgastrostomy and pancreatic necrosectomy.腹腔镜内胃和经胃囊肿胃造口术及胰腺坏死组织清除术。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Jan-Feb;55(81):262-5.
5
Increased intra-abdominal pressure: is it of any consequence in severe acute pancreatitis?腹腔内压升高:在重症急性胰腺炎中有何影响?
HPB (Oxford). 2006;8(3):227-32. doi: 10.1080/13651820500540956.
6
Debridement and closed packing for sterile or infected necrotizing pancreatitis: insights into indications and outcomes in 167 patients.清创术与闭式填塞治疗无菌性或感染性坏死性胰腺炎:167例患者的指征及预后分析
Ann Surg. 2008 Feb;247(2):294-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815b6976.
7
New advances in pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术的新进展。
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2007 Sep;23(5):522-34. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3282ba56f8.
8
Case-matched comparison of the retroperitoneal approach with laparotomy for necrotizing pancreatitis.经腹膜后入路与剖腹手术治疗坏死性胰腺炎的病例匹配对照研究。
World J Surg. 2007 Aug;31(8):1635-42. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9083-6. Epub 2007 Jun 16.
9
Peroral endoscopic drainage/debridement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis.经口内镜下引流/清创治疗包裹性胰腺坏死
Ann Surg. 2007 Jun;245(6):943-51. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000254366.19366.69.
10
Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: role of CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage.急性坏死性胰腺炎:CT引导下经皮导管引流的作用
Abdom Imaging. 2007 May-Jun;32(3):351-61. doi: 10.1007/s00261-007-9221-5.

聚焦性胰腺坏死组织清除术治疗坏死性胰腺炎。

Focused open necrosectomy in necrotizing pancreatitis.

机构信息

Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Riga East Clinical University Hospital Gailezers, Riga, Latvia.

出版信息

HPB (Oxford). 2013 Jul;15(7):535-40. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12004. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1111/hpb.12004
PMID:23458703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3692024/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The control of sepsis is the primary goal of surgical intervention in patients with infected necrosis. Simple surgical approaches that are easy to reproduce may improve outcomes when specialists in endoscopy are not available. The aim of the present study was to describe the experience with a focused open necrosectomy (FON) in patients with infected necrosis.

METHOD

A prospective pilot study conducted to compare a semi-open/closed drainage laparotomy and FON with the assistance of peri-operative ultrasound. The incidence of sepsis, dynamics of C-reactive protein (CRP), intensive care unit (ICU)/hospital stay, complication rate and mortality were compared and analysed.

RESULTS

From a total of 58 patients, 36 patients underwent a conventional open necrosectomy and 22 patients underwent FON. The latter method resulted in a faster resolution of sepsis and a significant decrease in mean CRP on Day 3 after FON, P = 0.001. Post-operative bleeding was in 1 versus 7 patients and the incidence of intestinal and pancreatic fistula was 2 versus 8 patients when comparing FON to the conventional approach. The median ICU stay was 11.6 versus 23 days and the hospital stay was significantly shorter, 57 versus 72 days, P = 0.024 when comparing FON versus the conventional group. One patient died in the FON group and seven patients died in the laparotomy group, P = 0.139.

DISCUSSION

FON can be an alternative method to conventional open necrosectomy in patients with infected necrosis and unresolved sepsis.

摘要

背景

在感染性坏死患者中,外科干预的首要目标是控制脓毒症。当没有内镜专家时,简单且易于复制的手术方法可能会改善治疗效果。本研究旨在描述一种聚焦性开放性坏死组织清除术(FON)在感染性坏死患者中的应用经验。

方法

本前瞻性试点研究旨在比较半开放式/闭合式剖腹引流术与 FON 治疗方法,两种方法均在围手术期超声的辅助下进行。比较并分析了脓毒症的发生率、C 反应蛋白(CRP)的动态变化、重症监护病房(ICU)/住院时间、并发症发生率和死亡率。

结果

共纳入 58 例患者,其中 36 例行传统开放性坏死组织清除术,22 例行 FON。后者方法可更快地控制脓毒症,且 FON 术后第 3 天 CRP 均值显著下降,P = 0.001。术后出血分别发生在 1 例和 7 例患者中,肠瘘和胰瘘的发生率分别为 2 例和 8 例,与传统方法相比,FON 组的发生率较低。与传统组相比,FON 组 ICU 住院时间中位数为 11.6 天,住院时间显著缩短,为 57 天,P = 0.024。FON 组有 1 例患者死亡,剖腹引流组有 7 例患者死亡,P = 0.139。

讨论

对于感染性坏死和未解决的脓毒症患者,FON 可作为传统开放性坏死组织清除术的替代方法。