College of Pharmacy, Touro University California, Vallejo, CA 94592, USA.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Feb 12;77(1):3. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7713.
In a series of 3 papers on survey practices published from 2008 to 2009, the editors of the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education presented guidelines for reporting survey research, and these criteria are reflected in the Author Instructions provided on the Journal's Web site. This paper discusses the relevance of these criteria for publication of survey research regarding pharmacy colleges and schools. In addition, observations are offered about surveying of small "universes" like that comprised of US colleges and schools of pharmacy. The reason for revisiting this issue is the authors' concern that, despite the best of intentions, overly constraining publication standards might discourage research on US colleges and schools of pharmacy at a time when the interest in the growth of colleges and schools, curricular content, clinical education, competence at graduation, and other areas is historically high. In the best traditions of academia, the authors share these observations with the community of pharmacy educators in the hope that the publication standards for survey research about US pharmacy schools will encourage investigators to collect and disseminate valuable information.
在 2008 年至 2009 年发表的三篇关于调查实践的系列论文中,《美国药学教育杂志》的编辑提出了报告调查研究的指南,这些标准反映在该杂志网站上提供的作者说明中。本文讨论了这些标准对于发布有关药学学院的调查研究的相关性。此外,还对像美国药学学院这样的小“宇宙”进行调查的观察结果进行了讨论。之所以重新讨论这个问题,是因为作者担心,尽管意图良好,但过于严格的出版标准可能会阻碍对美国药学学院的研究,而此时人们对学院和学校的发展、课程内容、临床教育、毕业时的能力以及其他领域的兴趣正处于历史最高水平。本着学术界的最佳传统,作者与药学教育工作者社区分享这些观察结果,希望有关美国药学学校的调查研究的出版标准将鼓励研究人员收集和传播有价值的信息。