• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术在老年患者中的比较。

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting in elderly patients.

机构信息

Herz- und Gefäß-Klinik Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt, Germany.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28;368(13):1189-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211666. Epub 2013 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1211666
PMID:23477657
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefits of coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass in the elderly are still undetermined.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients 75 years of age or older who were scheduled for elective first-time CABG to undergo the procedure either without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG) or with it (on-pump CABG). The primary end point was a composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, or new renal-replacement therapy at 30 days and at 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 2539 patients underwent randomization. At 30 days after surgery, there was no significant difference between patients who underwent off-pump surgery and those who underwent on-pump surgery in terms of the composite outcome (7.8% vs. 8.2%; odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.28; P=0.74) or four of the components (death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or new renal-replacement therapy). Repeat revascularization occurred more frequently after off-pump CABG than after on-pump CABG (1.3% vs. 0.4%; odds ratio, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.03 to 5.72; P=0.04). At 12 months, there was no significant between-group difference in the composite end point (13.1% vs. 14.0%; hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.16; P=0.48) or in any of the individual components. Similar results were obtained in a per-protocol analysis that excluded the 177 patients who crossed over from the assigned treatment to the other treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients 75 years of age or older, there was no significant difference between on-pump and off-pump CABG with regard to the composite outcome of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, or new renal-replacement therapy within 30 days and within 12 months after surgery. (Funded by Maquet; GOPCABE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00719667.).

摘要

背景

在老年人中,不经体外循环的冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的益处仍不确定。

方法

我们将计划接受首次择期 CABG 的 75 岁或以上的患者随机分为两组,一组接受不经体外循环(非体外循环 CABG)的手术,另一组接受经体外循环(体外循环 CABG)的手术。主要终点是手术后 30 天和 12 个月时死亡、中风、心肌梗死、再次血运重建或新的肾脏替代治疗的复合结果。

结果

共有 2539 名患者接受了随机分组。手术后 30 天,非体外循环手术组和体外循环手术组在复合结果(7.8%对 8.2%;比值比,0.95;95%置信区间[CI],0.71 至 1.28;P=0.74)或四个组成部分(死亡、中风、心肌梗死或新的肾脏替代治疗)方面没有显著差异。非体外循环 CABG 后再次血运重建的发生率高于体外循环 CABG(1.3%对 0.4%;比值比,2.42;95%CI,1.03 至 5.72;P=0.04)。在 12 个月时,两组在复合终点(13.1%对 14.0%;风险比,0.93;95%CI,0.76 至 1.16;P=0.48)或任何单个组成部分方面均无显著差异。在排除从指定治疗转为其他治疗的 177 名患者的意向治疗分析中,也得到了类似的结果。

结论

在 75 岁或以上的患者中,与体外循环 CABG 相比,非体外循环 CABG 在术后 30 天和 12 个月内的死亡、中风、心肌梗死、再次血运重建或新的肾脏替代治疗的复合结果方面没有显著差异。(由 Maquet 资助;GOPCABE ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT00719667。)

相似文献

1
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting in elderly patients.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术在老年患者中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28;368(13):1189-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211666. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
2
Effects of off-pump and on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 1 year.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 1 年的效果。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28;368(13):1179-88. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301228. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
3
Off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 30 days.非体外循环或体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 30 天。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 19;366(16):1489-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200388. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
4
Five-Year Outcomes after Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 5 年结果。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2359-2368. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601564. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
5
On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in high-risk patients: operative results of a prospective randomized trial (on-off study).高危患者体外循环与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术:一项前瞻性随机试验的手术结果(On-off 研究)。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Mar;143(3):625-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.11.011. Epub 2011 Dec 10.
6
Three-year follow-up in a subset of high-risk patients randomly assigned to off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: the Best Bypass Surgery trial.随机分配至非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的高危患者亚组的 3 年随访:最佳旁路手术试验。
Heart. 2011 Jun;97(11):907-13. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.211680. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
7
Five-Year Outcome After Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Elderly Patients.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗老年患者的 5 年结果。
Circulation. 2019 Apr 16;139(16):1865-1871. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035857.
8
Propensity case-matched analysis of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with atheromatous aortic disease.动脉粥样硬化性主动脉疾病患者非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的倾向病例匹配分析
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Feb;127(2):406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.011.
9
No major differences in 30-day outcomes in high-risk patients randomized to off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: the best bypass surgery trial.高危患者随机分组至非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的 30 天结局无显著差异:最佳搭桥手术试验。
Circulation. 2010 Feb 2;121(4):498-504. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.880443. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
10
Rationale and design of the coronary artery bypass grafting surgery off or on pump revascularization study: a large international randomized trial in cardiac surgery.冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)体外循环与非体外循环转流研究的原理和设计:心脏外科学一项大型国际随机试验。
Am Heart J. 2012 Jan;163(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.10.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Study Design Update of the Off-pump versus On-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Frail Patients: FRAGILE Trial.老年患者非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的研究设计更新:FRAGILE试验
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jul 29;40(5):e20250199. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2025-0199.
2
Perioperative Red Blood Cell Transfusion and Long-Term Mortality in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: On-Pump and Off-Pump Analysis.冠状动脉搭桥术中围手术期红细胞输注与长期死亡率:体外循环与非体外循环分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 13;14(8):2662. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082662.
3
The Past, Present, and Future of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的过去、现在与未来
J Chest Surg. 2025 Jul 5;58(4):121-133. doi: 10.5090/jcs.24.122. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
4
Off-pump Myocardial Revascularization - From the Beginning Till Now.非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术——从起源到如今
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Feb 12;40(1):e20240993. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0993.
5
Predictors and Causes of Intraoperative Conversion From Off-Pump to On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass: A Retrospective Study.非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术中转为体外循环冠状动脉搭桥的预测因素及原因:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2024 Nov 6;16(11):e73177. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73177. eCollection 2024 Nov.
6
Prognostic value of preoperative nutritional status for postoperative moderate to severe acute kidney injury among older patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database.冠状动脉搭桥手术老年患者术前营养状况对术后中重度急性肾损伤的预后价值:一项基于MIMIC-IV数据库的回顾性研究
Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(2):2429683. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2429683. Epub 2024 Dec 1.
7
2024 EACTS/EACTAIC Guidelines on patient blood management in adult cardiac surgery in collaboration with EBCP.2024年欧洲心胸外科学会/欧洲心胸麻醉学会与欧洲血液管理协作组关于成人心脏手术患者血液管理的指南
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 May 6;40(5). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae170.
8
2024 EACTS/EACTAIC Guidelines on patient blood management in adult cardiac surgery in collaboration with EBCP.2024年欧洲心胸外科学会/欧洲心胸麻醉学会与欧洲输血协作项目合作制定的成人心脏手术患者血液管理指南。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 May 6;67(5). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae352.
9
Off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性肾病患者非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术:一项更新的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Feb;57(2):463-477. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04198-z. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
10
Improving diversity in cardiac surgery clinical trials with ROMA:Women as an exemplar.利用 ROMA 提高心脏外科学临床试验的多样性:以女性为例。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2024 Sep 1;39(5):426-430. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000001162. Epub 2024 Jun 25.