Lazon de la Jara Percy, Papas Eric, Diec Jennie, Naduvilath Thomas, Willcox Mark D P, Holden Brien A
The Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Apr;90(4):344-50. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318288e10c.
To evaluate subjective responses, rates of solution-induced corneal staining (SICS), and corneal infiltrative events (CIEs) associated with a silicone hydrogel when worn under a daily disposable (DD) or daily wear (DW) modality.
Data were obtained from seven prospective clinical trials, involving 283 subjects wearing Senofilcon A contact lenses (Johnson and Johnson Vision Care, Jacksonville, FL). Four groups wore the contact lens on a DW basis using multipurpose solutions (DW-MPS, n = 160), two groups using hydrogen peroxide (DW-H2O2, n = 83), and one group as a DD (n = 40). Participants were followed for 3 months using the same protocol. Subjective ratings were compared between DD and DW groups using a linear mixed model. Rates of SICS and CIE were calculated as the percent frequency of first events within the 3-month study. Association of SICS and CIE with subjective responses was analyzed using a linear mixed model.
End-of-day comfort and dryness ratings were significantly better for DD (8.5 ± 1.7 and 8.6 ± 1.7, respectively) compared with DW-H2O2 (7.7 ± 1.8, p = 0.01; 7.6 ± 1.9, p = 0.006, respectively) and DW-MPS (7.7 ± 1.7, p = 0.004; 7.6 ± 2.0, p = 0.003, respectively). Compared with DD, a higher incidence of CIE and SICS was found for DW-MPS (0.0 vs. 3.9%, p = 0.021; 0.9 vs. 8.6%, p = 0.002, respectively). Comfort at insertion and end of day and end-of-day dryness scores were significantly lower for participants who experienced SICS (8.2 ± 1.6, 7.0 ± 1.9, and 7.0 ± 2.2) than those who did not (8.8 ± 1.2, p = 0.004; 7.9 ± 1.7, p = 0.002; and 7.9 ± 1.8, p = 0.003, respectively). Comfort at insertion scores were significantly lower for participants who experienced CIEs than those who did not (8.2 ± 1.5 vs. 8.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.032).
Senofilcon A clinical response is modulated by the lens care products. All lens care products tested reduced subjective responses relative to DD modality, whereas MPS increased the incidence of CIEs and SICS. Senofilcon A performs best when used on a DD basis.
评估在日抛(DD)或日戴(DW)模式下佩戴硅水凝胶时的主观反应、溶液诱导性角膜染色(SICS)率和角膜浸润事件(CIE)。
数据来自7项前瞻性临床试验,涉及283名佩戴森弗利康A隐形眼镜(强生视力健公司,佛罗里达州杰克逊维尔)的受试者。四组受试者在日戴模式下使用多功能护理液(DW-MPS,n = 160),两组使用过氧化氢(DW-H2O2,n = 83),一组为日抛(n = 40)。采用相同方案对参与者进行3个月的随访。使用线性混合模型比较DD组和DW组的主观评分。SICS和CIE率计算为3个月研究内首次事件的发生频率百分比。使用线性混合模型分析SICS和CIE与主观反应的相关性。
与DW-H2O2组(分别为7.7±1.8,p = 0.01;7.6±1.9,p = 0.006)和DW-MPS组(分别为7.7±1.7,p = 0.004;7.6±2.0,p = 0.003)相比,DD组的日终舒适度和干燥度评分显著更高(分别为8.5±1.7和8.6±1.7)。与DD组相比,DW-MPS组的CIE和SICS发生率更高(分别为0.0%对3.9%,p = 0.021;0.9%对8.6%,p = 0.002)。发生SICS的参与者在佩戴时和日终的舒适度以及日终干燥度评分(分别为8.2±1.6、7.0±1.9和7.0±2.2)显著低于未发生者(分别为8.8±1.2,p = 0.004;7.9±1.7,p = 0.002;7.9±1.8,p = 0.003)。发生CIE的参与者在佩戴时的舒适度评分显著低于未发生者(8.2±1.5对8.8±1.4,p = 0.032)。
森弗利康A的临床反应受镜片护理产品的调节。所有测试的镜片护理产品相对于日抛模式均降低了主观反应,而多功能护理液增加了CIE和SICS的发生率。森弗利康A在日抛模式下使用时表现最佳。