• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创融合与内固定术与开放性手术治疗伴高度关节突关节炎的重度狭窄性脊椎滑脱症的比较。

Comparison of minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation versus open surgery for severe stenotic spondylolisthesis with high-grade facet joint osteoarthritis.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Offenbach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Frankfurt, Starkenburgring 66, 63069 Offenbach, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2013 Aug;22(8):1731-40. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2732-6. Epub 2013 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-013-2732-6
PMID:23479028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3731495/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The object of this study was to compare minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with open surgery in a severely affected subgroup of degenerative spondylolisthetic patients with severe stenosis (SDS) and high-grade facet osteoarthritis (FJO).

METHODS

From January 2009 to February 2010, 49 patients with severe SDS and high-grade FJO were treated using either MIS or open TLIF. Intraoperative and diagnostic data, including perioperative complications and length of hospital stay (LOS), were collected, using retrospective chart review. Surgical short- and long-term outcomes were assessed according to the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain.

RESULTS

Comparing MIS and open surgery, the MIS group had lesser blood loss, significantly lesser need for transfusion (p = 0.02), more rapid improvement of postoperative back pain in the first 6 weeks of follow-up and a shorter LOS. On the other hand, we experienced in the MIS group a longer operative time. The distribution on the postoperative ODI (p = 0.841), VAS leg (p = 0.943) and back pain (p = 0.735) scores after a mean follow-up of 2 years were similar. The overall proportion of complications showed no significant difference between the groups (29% in the MIS group vs. 28% in the open group, p = 0.999).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive surgery for severe SDS leads to adequate and safe decompression of lumbar stenosis and results in a faster recovery of symptoms and disability in the early postoperative period.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较微创外科(MIS)与开放手术治疗严重退行性腰椎滑脱伴严重狭窄(SDS)和高等级关节突关节炎(FJO)的严重受影响亚组患者的疗效。

方法

2009 年 1 月至 2010 年 2 月,49 例严重 SDS 和高等级 FJO 患者接受了 MIS 或开放 TLIF 治疗。通过回顾性图表审查收集了包括围手术期并发症和住院时间(LOS)在内的术中及诊断数据。根据 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)和腰背腿痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估手术的短期和长期疗效。

结果

与开放手术相比,MIS 组失血量较少,输血需求显著减少(p = 0.02),术后腰背疼痛在随访的前 6 周恢复更快,住院时间更短。另一方面,我们在 MIS 组中发现手术时间较长。在平均随访 2 年后,两组患者的术后 ODI 评分(p = 0.841)、VAS 腿痛评分(p = 0.943)和腰痛评分(p = 0.735)分布相似。两组并发症的总体比例无显著差异(MIS 组 29%,开放组 28%,p = 0.999)。

结论

严重 SDS 的微创外科治疗可充分、安全地减压腰椎狭窄,并在术后早期更快地缓解症状和残疾。

相似文献

1
Comparison of minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation versus open surgery for severe stenotic spondylolisthesis with high-grade facet joint osteoarthritis.微创融合与内固定术与开放性手术治疗伴高度关节突关节炎的重度狭窄性脊椎滑脱症的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Aug;22(8):1731-40. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2732-6. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
2
Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.I度退行性腰椎滑脱症的微创与开放融合手术:质量结果数据库分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17188.
3
Mid-term clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws versus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis.微创减压和经皮椎弓根螺钉后路融合与传统入路治疗退行性腰椎滑脱伴椎管狭窄的中期临床结果比较。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Jun;21(6):1171-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2114-x. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
4
A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?肥胖患者腰椎手术的前瞻性、多机构比较有效性研究:微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术是否能带来更好的疗效?
World Neurosurg. 2015 May;83(5):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.034. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
5
Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.微创后路经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的长期耐久性:临床及影像学随访
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):288-96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a.
6
[Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral tubular channels].[单节段腰椎滑脱症经双侧通道微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的临床疗效]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 1;55(4):279-284. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.04.009.
7
Comparison of minimally invasive decompression alone versus minimally invasive short-segment fusion in the setting of adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a propensity score-matched analysis.成人退变性腰椎侧凸中单纯微创减压与微创短节段融合的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Jun 9;39(3):394-403. doi: 10.3171/2023.4.SPINE221047. Print 2023 Sep 1.
8
[Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].[单节段腰椎退变性疾病的微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术短期疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Mar;27(3):262-7.
9
A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与单纯减压治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症的对比研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E13. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18722.
10
[Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].[象限通道下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ度退行性腰椎滑脱症]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Mar 25;32(3):199-206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.03.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of iatrogenic alterations on adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review.腰椎融合术后医源性改变对相邻节段退变的影响:一项系统综述
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 29;20(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05561-1.
2
Long-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive vs. Traditional Open Spinal Fusion: A Comparative Analysis.微创与传统开放性脊柱融合术的长期疗效:一项对比分析
J Spine Res Surg. 2025;7(1):18-25. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
3
Less Is More: Evaluating the Benefits of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery.少即是多:评估微创脊柱手术的益处
Life (Basel). 2024 Dec 25;15(1):8. doi: 10.3390/life15010008.
4
Comparison of midline lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbar degeneration disease.对比治疗腰椎退行性疾病的经椎间孔腰椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22154. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73213-1.
5
Different lumbar fusion techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.不同腰椎融合技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较:贝叶斯网状meta 分析。
BMC Surg. 2023 Nov 15;23(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02242-w.
6
Management of Spinal Metastasis by Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques: Surgical Principles and Indications-A Literature Review.微创外科技术治疗脊柱转移瘤:手术原则与适应证——文献综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 8;12(16):5165. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165165.
7
Latest Developments in Minimally Invasive Spinal Treatment in Slovakia and Its Comparison with an Open Approach for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.斯洛伐克微创脊柱治疗的最新进展及其与开放手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 18;12(14):4755. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144755.
8
How to predict the culprit segment in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery under local anesthesia for surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases? Radiologic images or clinical symptoms.在局部麻醉下经皮椎间孔镜手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病时,如何预测责任节段?是通过影像学图像还是临床症状?
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1060318. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1060318. eCollection 2022.
9
One-level open vs. minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and advanced meta-analytic assessment of prospective studies with at least two years follow-up.单节段开放式与微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的比较:至少随访 2 年的前瞻性研究的系统评价和高级荟萃分析评估。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Oct;31(10):2557-2571. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07223-w. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
10
Comparison of Clinical Outcome and Radiologic Parameters in Open TLIF Versus MIS-TLIF in Single- or Double-Level Lumbar Surgeries.单节段或双节段腰椎手术中开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的临床结果及影像学参数比较
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):962-970. doi: 10.14444/8126. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of spondylolisthesis and degenerative segmental instability.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症和退行性节段性不稳定的手术疗效
Asian Spine J. 2011 Dec;5(4):228-36. doi: 10.4184/asj.2011.5.4.228. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
2
[Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis].
Orthopade. 2012 Feb;41(2):153-62. doi: 10.1007/s00132-011-1832-4.
3
A minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine instabilities.微创后路腰椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎失稳症。
Eur Spine J. 2011 May;20 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S41-5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1762-1. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
4
Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.对因退行性腰椎管狭窄症接受减压性椎板切除术和后路内固定术患者手术结果的前瞻性分析。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44(3):235-40. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2010.2278.
5
Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images.基于磁共振图像硬膜囊形态的腰椎管狭窄严重程度的定性分级。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 1;35(21):1919-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd.
6
An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.微创与开放后路腰椎体间融合术后急性住院费用差异分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jun;12(6):694-9. doi: 10.3171/2009.12.SPINE09621.
7
Improving accuracy and reducing radiation exposure in minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion.提高微创腰椎椎间融合术的准确性并降低辐射暴露。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 May;12(5):533-9. doi: 10.3171/2009.11.SPINE09270.
8
Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2.对比退行性和峡部裂性 1 度和 2 度滑脱的单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Oct;19(10):1780-4. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1404-z. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
9
Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical review.微创脊柱技术与微创脊柱手术:历史回顾
Neurosurg Focus. 2009 Sep;27(3):E9. doi: 10.3171/2009.7.FOCUS09121.
10
Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts.腰椎退行性滑脱症手术治疗与非手术治疗的比较:脊柱患者预后研究试验(SPORT)随机分组及观察队列的四年结果
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jun;91(6):1295-304. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00913.