• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童幻想游戏中的情感表达、罗夏测验中的初级思维过程与发散性思维。

Affective expression in children's fantasy play, primary process thinking on the Rorschach, and divergent thinking.

作者信息

Russ S W, Grossman-McKee A

机构信息

Case Western Reserve University.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1990 Summer;54(3-4):756-71. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674036.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.1990.9674036
PMID:2348355
Abstract

The relationships among expression of primary process thinking on the Rorschach, affective expression in fantasy play, and divergent thinking were investigated in first and second grade children. Sixty children received the rorschach (Holt's scoring system), a play task (Affect in Play Scale), and the Alternate Uses Test. Major hypotheses were supported because the amount of primary process thinking on the Rorschach (frequency and percent) was significantly, positively related to amount of affective expression and primary process expression in play. Also, expression of affect in play (frequency, variety, integration, and comfort) was significantly, positively related to divergent thinking, independent of IQ for both boys and girls. On the Rorschach, percent of primary process was significantly related to divergent thinking for boys. The results suggest that the ability to think imaginatively in a free-association style and the ability to have access to affect-laden material are related processes.

摘要

对一、二年级儿童罗夏测验中初级过程思维的表达、幻想游戏中的情感表达和发散性思维之间的关系进行了研究。60名儿童接受了罗夏测验(霍尔特评分系统)、一项游戏任务(游戏中的情感量表)和替代用途测试。主要假设得到了支持,因为罗夏测验中初级过程思维的量(频率和百分比)与游戏中情感表达和初级过程表达的量显著正相关。此外,游戏中的情感表达(频率、多样性、整合性和舒适度)与发散性思维显著正相关,且与男孩和女孩的智商无关。在罗夏测验中,初级过程的百分比与男孩的发散性思维显著相关。结果表明,以自由联想方式进行想象性思考的能力和接触充满情感材料的能力是相关的过程。

相似文献

1
Affective expression in children's fantasy play, primary process thinking on the Rorschach, and divergent thinking.儿童幻想游戏中的情感表达、罗夏测验中的初级思维过程与发散性思维。
J Pers Assess. 1990 Summer;54(3-4):756-71. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674036.
2
Primary process thinking, divergent thinking, and coping in children.
J Pers Assess. 1988 Fall;52(3):539-48. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5203_17.
3
Primary process thinking and anxiety in children.
J Pers Assess. 1988 Summer;52(2):254-62. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5202_7.
4
Children's fantasy play and emotional understanding.儿童的幻想游戏与情感理解。
J Clin Child Psychol. 1999 Jun;28(2):269-77. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2802_13.
5
Sex differences in primary process thinking and flexibility in problem-solving in children.
J Pers Assess. 1982 Dec;46(6):569-77. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4606_2.
6
Relationships among affect in play, interpersonal themes in fantasy, and children's interpersonal behavior.游戏中的情感、幻想中的人际主题与儿童人际行为之间的关系。
J Pers Assess. 1996 Jun;66(3):645-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_12.
7
The development of primary process in children's Rorschachs.
J Pers Assess. 1986 Summer;50(2):149-70. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5002_1.
8
Development and validation of the Affect in Play Scale-brief rating version (APS-BR).游戏中情感量表简版(APS-BR)的编制与验证
J Pers Assess. 2008 Jan;90(1):52-60. doi: 10.1080/00223890701693744.
9
The relation between individual differences in fantasy and theory of mind.幻想方面的个体差异与心理理论之间的关系。
Child Dev. 1997 Jun;68(3):436-55.
10
The validity of the Rorschach for assessing cognitive and affective changes.
J Pers Assess. 1991 Oct;57(2):291-308. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5702_8.

引用本文的文献

1
Negative emotions and creativity among Chinese college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: the mediating role of psychological resilience and the moderating role of posttraumatic growth.新冠疫情期间中国大学生的负面情绪与创造力:心理韧性的中介作用及创伤后成长的调节作用
Arch Public Health. 2022 Aug 22;80(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00954-8.
2
Experiencing the impossible and creativity: a targeted literature review.体验不可能与创造力:有针对性的文献综述。
PeerJ. 2022 Jul 20;10:e13755. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13755. eCollection 2022.
3
Conjuring up creativity: the effect of performing magic tricks on divergent thinking.
激发创造力:表演魔术对发散性思维的影响。
PeerJ. 2021 Apr 15;9:e11289. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11289. eCollection 2021.
4
How does emotion influence the creativity evaluation of exogenous alternative ideas?情绪如何影响对外源替代想法的创造力评价?
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 5;14(7):e0219298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219298. eCollection 2019.
5
Fostering Children and Adolescents' Creative Thinking in Education. Theoretical Model of Drama Pedagogy Training.在教育中培养儿童和青少年的创造性思维。戏剧教学法培训的理论模型。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 7;9:2611. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02611. eCollection 2018.
6
How Do You Play? A Comparison among Children Aged 4-10.你怎么玩?4至10岁儿童的比较。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 17;7:1833. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01833. eCollection 2016.
7
Measuring creative imagery abilities.测量创造性想象能力。
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 21;6:1591. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01591. eCollection 2015.
8
Conflict Inhibitory Control Facilitates Pretense Quality in Young Preschoolers.冲突抑制控制有助于提高学龄前儿童的假装质量。
J Cogn Dev. 2015 Mar 1;16(2):333-350. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2013.833924.
9
Assessment of pretend play in Prader-Willi syndrome: a direct comparison to autism spectrum disorder.普拉德-威利综合征中假装游戏的评估:与自闭症谱系障碍的直接比较。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Apr;45(4):975-87. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2252-1.
10
Psychometric properties of the Dominic interactive assessment: a computerized self-report for children.多米尼克互动评估的心理测量特性:一种针对儿童的计算机化自我报告。
Assessment. 2006 Mar;13(1):16-26. doi: 10.1177/1073191105284843.