1 365Health Service, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Feb;24(1):101-5. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt034. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
To investigate mental health symptoms as prognostic risk markers of all-cause and psychiatric sickness absence (SA).
Mental health symptoms were measured in 1137 office workers with the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ), including scales for distress, depression, anxiety and somatization. The total number of SA days was accumulated prospectively on the individual level and high SA was defined as ≥30 SA days during 1-year follow-up. Psychiatric SA was also tallied on the individual level during 1-year follow-up. Baseline 4DSQ scores were associated with high all-cause SA and psychiatric SA by logistic regression analysis. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration slope were used to assess the accuracy of predictions by 4DSQ scores. The ability of 4DSQ scores to discriminate high-risk from low-risk employees was estimated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Six hundred thirty-three office workers (56%) participated in the study. All 4DSQ scales were prospectively associated with high all-cause SA and with psychiatric SA. Distress and somatization scores showed acceptable calibration, but failed to discriminate between office workers with and without high all-cause SA. The distress scale did show adequate calibration (calibration slope = 0.95) and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.71) for psychiatric SA.
Distress was a valid prognostic risk marker for identifying office workers at work, but at risk of future psychiatric SA. Further research is necessary to investigate the prognostic performance of distress as risk marker of psychiatric SA in other working populations and to determine cut-off points for distress.
调查心理健康症状作为全因和精神疾病缺勤(SA)的预后风险标志物。
1137 名办公室工作人员使用四维症状问卷(4DSQ)测量心理健康症状,包括困扰、抑郁、焦虑和躯体化量表。在个体水平上前瞻性地累计 SA 天数,高 SA 定义为 1 年随访期间≥30 天 SA。在 1 年随访期间,还在个体水平上累计精神 SA。通过逻辑回归分析,将基线 4DSQ 评分与高全因 SA 和精神 SA 相关联。Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验和校准斜率用于评估 4DSQ 评分的预测准确性。通过接收者操作特征曲线下的面积估计 4DSQ 评分区分高风险和低风险员工的能力。
633 名办公室工作人员(56%)参与了这项研究。所有 4DSQ 量表都与高全因 SA 和精神 SA 呈前瞻性相关。困扰和躯体化评分显示出可接受的校准,但未能区分有和无高全因 SA 的办公室工作人员。困扰量表对精神 SA 显示出适当的校准(校准斜率=0.95)和区分度(接收者操作特征曲线下的面积=0.71)。
困扰是一种有效的预后风险标志物,可用于识别工作中的办公室工作人员,但存在未来精神 SA 的风险。需要进一步研究,以调查困扰作为其他工作人群精神 SA 风险标志物的预后表现,并确定困扰的截断值。