• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神障碍缺勤预测模型和决策树的外部验证。

External validation of a prediction model and decision tree for sickness absence due to mental disorders.

机构信息

Department of Research and Development, Human Total Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020 Nov;93(8):1007-1012. doi: 10.1007/s00420-020-01548-z. Epub 2020 May 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00420-020-01548-z
PMID:32394071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7519895/
Abstract

PURPOSE

A previously developed prediction model and decision tree were externally validated for their ability to identify occupational health survey participants at increased risk of long-term sickness absence (LTSA) due to mental disorders.

METHODS

The study population consisted of N = 3415 employees in mobility services who were invited in 2016 for an occupational health survey, consisting of an online questionnaire measuring the health status and working conditions, followed by a preventive consultation with an occupational health provider (OHP). The survey variables of the previously developed prediction model and decision tree were used for predicting mental LTSA (no = 0, yes = 1) at 1-year follow-up. Discrimination between survey participants with and without mental LTSA was investigated with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

A total of n = 1736 (51%) non-sick-listed employees participated in the survey and 51 (3%) of them had mental LTSA during follow-up. The prediction model discriminated (AUC = 0.700; 95% CI 0.628-0.773) between participants with and without mental LTSA during follow-up. Discrimination by the decision tree (AUC = 0.671; 95% CI 0.589-0.753) did not differ significantly (p = 0.62) from discrimination by the prediction model.

CONCLUSION

At external validation, the prediction model and the decision tree both poorly identified occupational health survey participants at increased risk of mental LTSA. OHPs could use the decision tree to determine if mental LTSA risk factors should be explored in the preventive consultation which follows after completing the survey questionnaire.

摘要

目的

为了评估先前开发的预测模型和决策树在识别因精神障碍而长期病假(LTSA)风险增加的职业健康调查参与者方面的能力,对其进行了外部验证。

方法

研究人群由 Mobility Services 中的 3415 名员工组成,他们于 2016 年受邀参加职业健康调查,包括在线问卷调查,以衡量健康状况和工作条件,随后由职业健康提供者(OHP)进行预防性咨询。先前开发的预测模型和决策树的调查变量用于预测 1 年随访时的精神 LTSA(无=0,有=1)。使用接收者操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积来研究调查参与者是否存在精神 LTSA 的差异。

结果

共有 n=1736(51%)名非病假员工参加了调查,其中 51 人(3%)在随访期间患有精神 LTSA。预测模型(AUC=0.700;95%CI 0.628-0.773)能够区分随访期间患有和不患有精神 LTSA 的参与者。决策树的区分度(AUC=0.671;95%CI 0.589-0.753)与预测模型的区分度无显著差异(p=0.62)。

结论

在外部验证中,预测模型和决策树均无法很好地识别职业健康调查参与者中精神 LTSA 风险增加的人群。OHP 可以使用决策树来确定在完成问卷调查后的预防性咨询中是否需要探索精神 LTSA 风险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daeb/7519895/72d67db5aa1e/420_2020_1548_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daeb/7519895/72d67db5aa1e/420_2020_1548_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daeb/7519895/72d67db5aa1e/420_2020_1548_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
External validation of a prediction model and decision tree for sickness absence due to mental disorders.精神障碍缺勤预测模型和决策树的外部验证。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020 Nov;93(8):1007-1012. doi: 10.1007/s00420-020-01548-z. Epub 2020 May 11.
2
Development and validation of a prediction model for long-term sickness absence based on occupational health survey variables.基于职业健康调查变量的长期病假预测模型的开发与验证
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jan;40(2):168-175. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1247471. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
3
Development of Prediction Models for Sickness Absence Due to Mental Disorders in the General Working Population.精神障碍所致缺勤预测模型在一般劳动人群中的开发。
J Occup Rehabil. 2020 Sep;30(3):308-317. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09852-3.
4
Can the Maslach Burnout Inventory and Utrecht Work Engagement Scale be used to screen for risk of long-term sickness absence?马氏职业倦怠量表和乌得勒支工作投入量表能否用于筛查长期病假风险?
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015 May;88(4):467-75. doi: 10.1007/s00420-014-0981-2. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
5
Mental health symptoms identify workers at risk of long-term sickness absence due to mental disorders: prospective cohort study with 2-year follow-up.心理健康症状可识别出因精神障碍而面临长期病假风险的员工:一项为期两年随访的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 12;15:1235. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2580-x.
6
Long-term sickness absence in a working population: development and validation of a risk prediction model in a large Dutch prospective cohort.工作人群中的长期病假:在一个大型荷兰前瞻性队列中开发和验证风险预测模型。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 15;20(1):699. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08843-x.
7
External Validation and Update of a Prediction Rule for the Duration of Sickness Absence Due to Common Mental Disorders.常见精神障碍缺勤持续时间预测规则的外部验证和更新。
J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Jun;27(2):202-209. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9646-1.
8
Psychosocial work characteristics and long-term sickness absence due to mental disorders.心理社会工作特征与精神障碍导致的长期病假。
J Ment Health. 2020 Dec;29(6):649-656. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2018.1437603. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
9
Predicting long-term sickness absence among employees with frequent sickness absence.预测频繁请病假员工的长期病假。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019 May;92(4):501-511. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1384-6. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
10
Frequent short sickness absence, occupational health service utilisation and long-term sickness absence due to mental disorders among young employees.年轻员工频繁的短期病假、职业健康服务利用情况以及因精神障碍导致的长期病假。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021 Oct;94(7):1549-1558. doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01728-5. Epub 2021 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Performance, Interpretability, and Explainability in Artificial Intelligence-Based Health Technologies: What Healthcare Stakeholders Need to Know.基于人工智能的健康技术的性能、可解释性和可说明性评估:医疗保健利益相关者需要了解的内容。
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023 Apr 21;1(2):120-138. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.02.004. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Association Between Social Capital and Anxiety Among Older Adults in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国老年人社会资本与焦虑之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2025 Mar 20;18:689-702. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S508795. eCollection 2025.
3
External validation of a predictive model for post-treatment persistent disease by I whole-body scintigraphy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of Prediction Models for Sickness Absence Due to Mental Disorders in the General Working Population.精神障碍所致缺勤预测模型在一般劳动人群中的开发。
J Occup Rehabil. 2020 Sep;30(3):308-317. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09852-3.
2
Psychological distress screener for risk of future mental sickness absence in non-sicklisted employees.非病假员工未来精神疾病缺勤风险的心理困扰筛查工具
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Jun;26(3):510-2. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw034. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
3
Mental health symptoms identify workers at risk of long-term sickness absence due to mental disorders: prospective cohort study with 2-year follow-up.
通过全身闪烁扫描对分化型甲状腺癌患者治疗后持续性疾病预测模型的外部验证。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Feb 25. doi: 10.1007/s00259-025-07124-2.
4
A novel model to predict mental distress among medical graduate students in China.一种预测中国医学研究生心理困扰的新模型。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 15;21(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03573-9.
心理健康症状可识别出因精神障碍而面临长期病假风险的员工:一项为期两年随访的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 12;15:1235. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2580-x.
4
Prediction models need appropriate internal, internal-external, and external validation.预测模型需要进行适当的内部验证、内部-外部联合验证以及外部验证。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:245-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
5
Comments on Fifty Years of Classification and Regression Trees.关于分类与回归树五十年的评论
Int Stat Rev. 2014 Dec 1;82(3):359-361. doi: 10.1111/insr.12060.
6
Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration.透明报告个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型(TRIPOD):解释和说明。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73. doi: 10.7326/M14-0698.
7
Mental health symptoms as prognostic risk markers of all-cause and psychiatric sickness absence in office workers.精神健康症状作为办公室工作人员全因和精神疾病缺勤的预后风险标志物。
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Feb;24(1):101-5. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt034. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
8
Comprehensive decision tree models in bioinformatics.生物信息学中的综合决策树模型。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033812. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
9
Work and common psychiatric disorders.工作与常见精神障碍。
J R Soc Med. 2011 May;104(5):198-207. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.100231.
10
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积的意义及应用。
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747.