Institute on Asian Consumer Insight, Singapore.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Jun;39(6):763-76. doi: 10.1177/0146167213481387. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
Past research showed that East Asians' belief in holism was expressed as their tendencies to include background facial emotions into the evaluation of target faces more than North Americans. However, this pattern can be interpreted as North Americans' tendency to downplay background facial emotions due to their conceptualization of facial emotion as volitional expression of internal states. Examining this alternative explanation, we investigated whether different types of contextual information produce varying degrees of effect on one's face evaluation across cultures. In three studies, European Canadians and East Asians rated the intensity of target facial emotions surrounded with either affectively salient landscape sceneries or background facial emotions. The results showed that, although affectively salient landscapes influenced the judgment of both cultural groups, only European Canadians downplayed the background facial emotions. The role of agency as differently conceptualized across cultures and multilayered systems of cultural meanings are discussed.
过去的研究表明,东亚人整体论的信念表现为他们比北美人更倾向于将背景面部情绪纳入对目标面部的评价中。然而,这种模式可以解释为北美人由于将面部情绪概念化为内部状态的意志表达,因此倾向于淡化背景面部情绪。为了检验这一替代解释,我们研究了在不同文化中,不同类型的上下文信息是否会对一个人的面部评价产生不同程度的影响。在三项研究中,欧洲加拿大裔和东亚人评价了被情感上显著的景观场景或背景面部情绪包围的目标面部情绪的强度。结果表明,尽管情感上显著的景观影响了两个文化群体的判断,但只有欧洲加拿大裔淡化了背景面部情绪。跨文化和多层次文化意义系统中不同概念化的能动性作用被讨论。