• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钝性脑血管损伤:多创伤全身 MDCT 的诊断。

Blunt cerebrovascular injury: diagnosis at whole-body MDCT for multi-trauma.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, San Maurizio Hospital, 5 Boehler Street, 39100, Bolzano, Italy,

出版信息

Insights Imaging. 2013 Jun;4(3):347-55. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0235-y. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1007/s13244-013-0235-y
PMID:23512271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3675247/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyse the prevalence of blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs) in multi-trauma patients by means of a post-contrast acquisition of neck vessels included into the whole-body multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) protocol performed at admission and to correlate it with the presence of risk factors (Memphis approach).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was undertaken for the period January 2005 to November 2011, involving 976 multi-trauma patients. Post-contrast images of neck vessels in MDCT scan were evaluated by two experienced radiologists; carotid, vertebral and basilar arteries were rated according to the Biffl classification. The presence of clinical and/or CT risk factors for BCVI was assessed.

RESULTS

BCVI were present in 32/976 (3.3 %) multi-trauma patients. Risk factors for BCVI were present in 247/976 (25.3 %) patients. The group of patients presenting risk factors showed a significantly higher prevalence of cerebrovascular injuries (8.1 %) compared with the group of patients without risk factors (1.6 %) (p = 0.009); however, 12/32 (37.5 %) patients presenting BCVI did not show any of the risk factors proposed by the Memphis group.

CONCLUSION

An investigation for the presence of BCVI should be performed on all multi-trauma patients despite the absence of clinical-radiological risk factors.

KEY POINTS

• BCVIs are present in 3.3 % of multi-trauma patients. • BCVIs are significantly associated to the Memphis risk factors. • Of the multi-trauma patients affected by BCVIs, 37.5 % do not show clinical-radiological risk factors. • A screening for BCVI should be performed on all multi-trauma patients.

摘要

目的

通过在入院时进行的全身多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)协议中包含的颈部血管的对比后采集来分析多发创伤患者中钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)的发生率,并将其与危险因素的存在相关联(孟菲斯方法)。

材料和方法

回顾性研究于 2005 年 1 月至 2011 年 11 月进行,涉及 976 例多发创伤患者。由两名经验丰富的放射科医生对 MDCT 扫描的颈部血管对比后图像进行评估;根据 Biffl 分类对颈动脉、椎动脉和基底动脉进行评分。评估了 BCVI 的临床和/或 CT 危险因素的存在。

结果

32/976(3.3%)例多发创伤患者存在 BCVI。247/976(25.3%)例患者存在 BCVI 的危险因素。与无危险因素的患者(1.6%)相比,有危险因素的患者(8.1%)出现脑血管损伤的比例明显更高(p=0.009);然而,12/32(37.5%)例存在 BCVI 的患者没有出现孟菲斯组提出的任何危险因素。

结论

尽管缺乏临床-影像学危险因素,所有多发创伤患者都应进行 BCVI 的调查。

关键点

  1. BCVI 存在于 3.3%的多发创伤患者中。

  2. BCVI 与孟菲斯危险因素显著相关。

  3. 在患有 BCVI 的多发创伤患者中,37.5%的患者没有出现临床-影像学危险因素。

  4. 所有多发创伤患者都应进行 BCVI 的筛查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7339/3675247/9467db1b6ccc/13244_2013_235_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7339/3675247/e209f40e5cfb/13244_2013_235_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7339/3675247/1f02dbc2fcb5/13244_2013_235_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7339/3675247/3a5ae5c9cc31/13244_2013_235_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7339/3675247/602c38e683fc/13244_2013_235_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7339/3675247/18dfff76da8c/13244_2013_235_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7339/3675247/9467db1b6ccc/13244_2013_235_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7339/3675247/e209f40e5cfb/13244_2013_235_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7339/3675247/1f02dbc2fcb5/13244_2013_235_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7339/3675247/3a5ae5c9cc31/13244_2013_235_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7339/3675247/602c38e683fc/13244_2013_235_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7339/3675247/18dfff76da8c/13244_2013_235_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7339/3675247/9467db1b6ccc/13244_2013_235_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Blunt cerebrovascular injury: diagnosis at whole-body MDCT for multi-trauma.钝性脑血管损伤:多创伤全身 MDCT 的诊断。
Insights Imaging. 2013 Jun;4(3):347-55. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0235-y. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
2
Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: does treatment always matter?钝性脑血管损伤:治疗是否总是至关重要?
J Trauma. 2009 Jan;66(1):132-43; discussion 143-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318142d146.
3
Blunt cerebrovascular injuries in association with craniocervical distraction injuries: a retrospective review of consecutive cases.钝性脑血管损伤合并颅颈牵张损伤:连续病例的回顾性研究
Spine J. 2015 Mar 1;15(3):499-505. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
4
A multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for blunt cerebrovascular injury.多变量逻辑回归分析钝性脑血管损伤的危险因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;51(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.071. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
5
Blunt cerebrovascular injury: The case for universal screening.钝性脑血管损伤:普遍筛查的理由。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Nov;89(5):880-886. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002824.
6
Risk factors for traumatic blunt cerebrovascular injury diagnosed by computed tomography angiography in the pediatric population: a retrospective cohort study.计算机断层血管造影诊断儿童创伤性钝性脑血管损伤的危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Jun;15(6):599-606. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.PEDS14397. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
7
The limitations of using risk factors to screen for blunt cerebrovascular injuries: the harder you look, the more you find.
World J Emerg Surg. 2015 Sep 26;10:46. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0040-7. eCollection 2015.
8
Pediatric blunt cerebrovascular injury: the McGovern screening score.小儿钝性脑血管损伤:麦戈文筛查评分
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Jun;21(6):639-649. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.PEDS17498. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of different clinical screening criteria for blunt cerebrovascular injuries compared with liberal state of the art computed tomography angiography in major trauma.不同临床筛查标准对钝性脑血管损伤的诊断准确性与大创伤中自由状态的先进 CT 血管造影比较。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jun;88(6):789-795. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002682.
10
Initial screening test for blunt cerebrovascular injury: Validity assessment of whole-body computed tomography.钝性脑血管损伤的初始筛查试验:全身计算机断层扫描的有效性评估
Surgery. 2015 Sep;158(3):627-35. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.063. Epub 2015 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Augmenting Denver criteria yields increased BCVI detection, with screening showing markedly increased risk for subsequent ischemic stroke.强化丹佛标准可提高钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)的检测率,筛查显示后续缺血性卒中风险显著增加。
Emerg Radiol. 2019 Aug;26(4):365-372. doi: 10.1007/s10140-019-01677-0. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
2
Blunt traumatic vascular injuries of the head and neck in the ED.急诊科中头颈部钝性创伤性血管损伤
Emerg Radiol. 2019 Feb;26(1):75-85. doi: 10.1007/s10140-018-1630-y. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: redefining screening criteria in the era of noninvasive diagnosis.钝性脑血管损伤:在无创诊断时代重新定义筛选标准。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Feb;72(2):330-5; discussion 336-7, quiz 539. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823de8a0.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic screening criteria for blunt cerebrovascular injuries.一项关于钝性脑血管损伤诊断筛查标准的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Mar;214(3):313-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.11.012. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
3
Blunt cerebrovascular injury is poorly predicted by modeling with other injuries: analysis of NTDB data.
钝性脑血管损伤难以通过与其他损伤的模型进行预测:对国家创伤数据库(NTDB)数据的分析
J Trauma. 2011 Jul;71(1):114-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31821c350f.
4
Incidence of blunt craniocervical artery injuries: use of whole-body computed tomography trauma imaging with adapted computed tomography angiography.钝性颅颈动脉损伤的发生率:使用全身计算机断层扫描创伤成像和适应性计算机断层血管造影。
Neurosurgery. 2011 Sep;69(3):615-23; discussion 623-4. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821a8701.
5
Management of blunt extracranial traumatic cerebrovascular injury: a multidisciplinary survey of current practice.钝性颅脑创伤性脑血管损伤的治疗:当前实践的多学科调查。
World J Emerg Surg. 2011 Apr 8;6:11. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-6-11.
6
Optimal outcomes for patients with blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI): tailoring treatment to the lesion.钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)患者的最佳治疗效果:针对损伤进行治疗。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Apr;212(4):549-57; discussion 557-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.035.
7
Cerebrovascular dissections--a review part I: Spontaneous dissections.脑血管夹层——综述部分 I:自发性夹层。
Neurosurgery. 2011 Jan;68(1):242-57; discussion 257. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182012323.
8
Cerebrovascular dissections: a review. Part II: blunt cerebrovascular injury.脑血管分裂:综述。第二部分:钝性脑血管损伤。
Neurosurgery. 2011 Feb;68(2):517-30; discussion 530. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181fe2fda.
9
Blunt cerebrovascular injury practice management guidelines: the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.钝性脑血管损伤实践管理指南:东部创伤外科学会
J Trauma. 2010 Feb;68(2):471-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181cb43da.
10
Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma: screening for and treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injuries.西方创伤协会创伤关键决策:钝性脑血管损伤的筛查与治疗
J Trauma. 2009 Dec;67(6):1150-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c1c1d6.