Suppr超能文献

老年人慢性疼痛的自我管理干预:一项随机对照试验。

Self-management intervention for chronic pain in older adults: a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Pain Management Research Institute, University of Sydney at Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Pain. 2013 Jun;154(6):824-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

Abstract

This study compared an outpatient pain self-management (PSM) program, using cognitive-behavioural therapy and exercises, with 2 control conditions in 141 chronic pain patients aged > 65 years. Results immediately posttreatment indicated that relative to the Exercise-Attention Control (EAC) group, the PSM group was significantly improved on measures of pain distress, disability, mood, unhelpful pain beliefs, and functional reach. The mean effect size for these gains was 0.52 (range: 0.44-0.68). By 1-month follow-up, relative to the EAC group, the PSM group remained better on most measures. At the 1-month follow-up, relative to a Waiting List (usual care) (WL) group, the PSM group was significantly improved on measures of pain distress, disability, and unhelpful pain beliefs. The mean effect size for these variables was 0.69 (range: 0.56-0.83). Relative to the WL group, the EAC group made no significant gains on any of the measured variables. At 1-month follow-up, the mean proportion of reliably improved cases (across outcome variables) was 41% (range: 16-60%) for the PSM group, twice that of those who met this criterion in the 2 control conditions (and this difference was statistically significant). Similarly, significantly more (44%) of the PSM group (vs 22% and 20% for the control groups) achieved a clinically significant improvement on pain disability. In the short term at least, cognitive-behavioural therapy-based PSM was more effective than exercises and usual care.

摘要

本研究比较了门诊疼痛自我管理(PSM)计划,使用认知行为疗法和运动,与 141 名年龄大于 65 岁的慢性疼痛患者的 2 个对照条件。治疗后即刻的结果表明,与运动-注意对照组(EAC)相比,PSM 组在疼痛困扰、残疾、情绪、无益的疼痛信念和功能伸展方面有显著改善。这些收益的平均效应大小为 0.52(范围:0.44-0.68)。在 1 个月的随访中,与 EAC 组相比,PSM 组在大多数测量指标上仍保持较好。在 1 个月的随访中,与等待名单(常规护理)(WL)组相比,PSM 组在疼痛困扰、残疾和无益的疼痛信念方面有显著改善。这些变量的平均效应大小为 0.69(范围:0.56-0.83)。与 WL 组相比,EAC 组在任何测量变量上均未取得显著进展。在 1 个月的随访中,PSM 组可靠改善病例(跨结果变量)的比例为 41%(范围:16-60%),是对照组的两倍(且差异具有统计学意义)。同样,PSM 组中(与对照组的 22%和 20%相比)有更多(44%)的人在疼痛残疾方面取得了临床显著改善。至少在短期内,基于认知行为疗法的 PSM 比运动和常规护理更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验