Suppr超能文献

纳米混合材料与精细混合复合材料用于Ⅱ类洞型扩展修复:8年随访结果

Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: 8-year results.

作者信息

Frankenberger Roland, Reinelt Christian, Krämer Norbert

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Medical Center for Dentistry, University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Campus Marburg, Georg-Voigt-Str 3, 35039, Marburg, Germany,

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Jan;18(1):125-37. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0957-8. Epub 2013 Mar 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In a controlled prospective split-mouth study, clinical behavior of two different resin composites in extended class II cavities was observed over 8 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients received 68 direct resin composite restorations (Solobond M/Grandio, Voco--n = 36; Syntac/Tetric Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent--n = 32) by one dentist in a private practice. Thirty-five percent of cavities revealed no enamel at the bottom of the proximal box, 48% of cavities provided <0.5 mm remaining proximal enamel width. Restorations were examined according to modified US Public Health Service criteria at baseline, after 6 months, and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 years.

RESULTS

All patients attended the 8-year recall. The overall success rate of all restorations was 98.5% (Kaplan-Meier survival algorithm). One Grandio restoration was lost due to bulk fracture. One Tetric Ceram restoration suffered drop out due to cusp fracture having been not related to the restoration itself. Neither restorative materials nor localization of the restorations had a significant influence on any criterion except color (darker for Grandio). Restorations in molars performed inferior compared with premolars regarding marginal integrity (4 years), restoration integrity (6, 12, 24, 48, and 96 months), and tooth integrity (12, 48, 72, and 96 months). Irrespective of the resin composite used, significant changes over time were found for all criteria evaluated in clinical examinations. Beyond the 4-year recall, marginal staining increased. Both phenomena were found earlier in molars compared with premolars. Tooth integrity significantly deteriorated because of increasing enamel cracks and chippings over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Both materials performed satisfactorily over the 8-year observation period. Due to the extension of the restorations, wear was clearly visible after 8 years of clinical service.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Hybrid and nanohybrid resin composites show an acceptable clinical performance after 8 years of service.

摘要

目的

在一项前瞻性对照双侧对照研究中,对两种不同的树脂复合材料在Ⅱ类洞型扩展修复体中的临床性能进行了8年的观察。

材料与方法

30例患者在私人诊所由一名牙医进行了68颗直接树脂复合材料修复(Solobond M/Grandio,Voco公司,n = 36;Syntac/Tetric Ceram,义获嘉伟瓦登特公司,n = 32)。35%的洞型在邻面盒底部无釉质,48%的洞型剩余邻面釉质宽度<0.5mm。修复体在基线、6个月后以及1、2、4、6和8年时根据改良的美国公共卫生服务标准进行检查。

结果

所有患者均参加了8年的随访。所有修复体的总体成功率为98.5%(Kaplan-Meier生存算法)。一颗Grandio修复体因大块折断而失败。一颗Tetric Ceram修复体因尖折而脱落,与修复体本身无关。除颜色外(Grandio颜色较深),修复材料和修复体位置对任何标准均无显著影响。磨牙修复体在边缘完整性(4年)、修复体完整性(6、12、24、48和96个月)以及牙齿完整性(12、48、72和96个月)方面的表现均不如前磨牙。无论使用何种树脂复合材料,临床检查中评估的所有标准均随时间发生显著变化。4年随访后,边缘染色增加。这两种现象在磨牙中比在前磨牙中出现得更早。由于釉质裂纹和碎片随时间增加,牙齿完整性显著恶化。

结论

两种材料在8年的观察期内表现令人满意。由于修复体的扩展,临床使用8年后磨损明显可见。

临床意义

混合和纳米混合树脂复合材料在使用8年后显示出可接受的临床性能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验