Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Science, Sacred Heart University Fairfield, CT, USA.
Front Integr Neurosci. 2013 Mar 26;7:14. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00014. eCollection 2013.
Sensory processing deficits are common within autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Deficits have a heterogeneous dispersion across the spectrum and multimodal processing tasks are thought to magnify integration difficulties. Two-legged hopping in place in sync with an auditory cue (2.3, 3.0 Hz) was studied in a group of six individuals with expressive language impaired ASD (ELI-ASD) and an age-matched control group. Vertical ground reaction force data were collected and discrete Fourier transforms were utilized to determine dominant hopping cadence. Effective leg stiffness was computed through a mass-spring model representation. The ELI-ASD group were unsuccessful in matching their hopping cadence (2.21 ± 0.30 hops·s(-1), 2.35 ± 0.41 hops·s(-1)) to either auditory cue with greater deviations at the 3.0 Hz cue. In contrast, the control group was able to match hopping cadence (2.35 ± 0.06 hops·s(-1), 3.02 ± 0.10 hops·s(-1)) to either cue via an adjustment of effective leg stiffness. The ELI-ASD group demonstrated a varied response with an interquartile range (IQR) in excess of 0.5 hops·s(-1) as compared to the control group with an IQR < 0.03 hops·s(-1). Several sensorimotor mechanisms could explain the inability of participants with ELI-ASD to modulate motor output to match an external auditory cue. These results suggest that a multimodal gross motor task can (1) discriminate performance among a group of individuals with severe autism, and (2) could be a useful quantitative tool for evaluating motor performance in individuals with ASD individuals.
感觉处理缺陷在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)中很常见。缺陷在谱系内呈异质分布,多模态处理任务被认为会放大整合困难。在一组有表达性语言障碍 ASD(ELI-ASD)的个体和年龄匹配的对照组中,研究了双腿同步在听觉提示(2.3、3.0 Hz)下原地跳跃。采集垂直地面反作用力数据,并利用离散傅里叶变换确定主导跳跃节奏。通过质量-弹簧模型表示计算有效腿部刚度。ELI-ASD 组未能将其跳跃节奏(2.21 ± 0.30 次·s(-1),2.35 ± 0.41 次·s(-1))与任何听觉提示匹配,而在 3.0 Hz 提示下的偏差更大。相比之下,对照组能够通过调整有效腿部刚度将跳跃节奏(2.35 ± 0.06 次·s(-1),3.02 ± 0.10 次·s(-1))与任何提示匹配。ELI-ASD 组的反应各不相同,四分位距(IQR)超过 0.5 次·s(-1),而对照组的 IQR<0.03 次·s(-1)。几种感觉运动机制可以解释 ELI-ASD 参与者无法调节运动输出以匹配外部听觉提示的原因。这些结果表明,多模态粗大运动任务可以 (1) 区分严重自闭症个体群体的表现,以及 (2) 可能是评估 ASD 个体运动表现的有用定量工具。