Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University Newark, NJ, USA.
Front Psychol. 2013 Mar 25;4:137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00137. eCollection 2013.
This study reports an evaluation of the effect of computer-based cognitive and linguistic training on college students' reading and writing skills. The computer-based training included a series of increasingly challenging software programs that were designed to strengthen students' foundational cognitive skills (memory, attention span, processing speed, and sequencing) in the context of listening and higher level reading tasks. Twenty-five college students (12 native English language; 13 English Second Language), who demonstrated poor writing skills, participated in the training group. The training group received daily training during the spring semester (11 weeks) with the Fast ForWord Literacy (FFW-L) and upper levels of the Fast ForWord Reading series (Levels 3-5). The comparison group (n = 28) selected from the general college population did not receive training. Both the training and comparison groups attended the same university. All students took the Gates MacGinitie Reading Test (GMRT) and the Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Written Expression Scale at the beginning (Time 1) and end (Time 2) of the spring college semester. Results from this study showed that the training group made a statistically greater improvement from Time 1 to Time 2 in both their reading skills and their writing skills than the comparison group. The group who received training began with statistically lower writing skills before training, but exceeded the writing skills of the comparison group after training.
本研究报告评估了基于计算机的认知和语言训练对大学生阅读和写作技能的影响。基于计算机的训练包括一系列越来越具有挑战性的软件程序,旨在加强学生在听力和更高层次阅读任务背景下的基础认知技能(记忆力、注意力持续时间、处理速度和排序)。25 名写作技能较差的大学生(12 名母语为英语;13 名英语为第二语言)参加了培训组。培训组在春季学期(11 周)期间每天接受 Fast ForWord Literacy(FFW-L)和 Fast ForWord 阅读系列的高级课程(第 3-5 级)的培训。从普通大学生群体中挑选出的对照组(n=28)没有接受培训。培训组和对照组都就读于同一所大学。所有学生都在春季大学学期开始时(时间 1)和结束时(时间 2)参加 Gates MacGinitie 阅读测试(GMRT)和口语和书面语言量表(OWLS)书面表达量表。本研究的结果表明,与对照组相比,培训组在阅读技能和写作技能方面都从时间 1 到时间 2 取得了统计学上更大的进步。接受培训的组在培训前的写作技能统计上较低,但在培训后超过了对照组的写作技能。