Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058975. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
No consensus exists on screening to detect the estimated 2 million Americans unaware of their chronic hepatitis C infections. Advisory groups differ, recommending birth-cohort screening for baby boomers, screening only high-risk individuals, or no screening. We assessed one-time risk assessment and screening to identify previously undiagnosed 40-74 year-olds given newly available hepatitis C treatments.
A Markov model evaluated alternative risk-factor guided and birth-cohort screening and treatment strategies. Risk factors included drug use history, blood transfusion before 1992, and multiple sexual partners. Analyses of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey provided sex-, race-, age-, and risk-factor-specific hepatitis C prevalence and mortality rates. Nine strategies combined screening (no screening, risk-factor guided screening, or birth-cohort screening) and treatment (standard therapy-peginterferon alfa and ribavirin, Interleukin-28B-guided (IL28B) triple-therapy-standard therapy plus a protease inhibitor, or universal triple therapy). Response-guided treatment depended on HCV genotype. Outcomes include discounted lifetime costs (2010 dollars) and quality adjusted life-years (QALYs). Compared to no screening, risk-factor guided and birth-cohort screening for 50 year-olds gained 0.7 to 3.5 quality adjusted life-days and cost $168 to $568 per person. Birth-cohort screening provided more benefit per dollar than risk-factor guided screening and cost $65,749 per QALY if followed by universal triple therapy compared to screening followed by IL28B-guided triple therapy. If only 10% of screen-detected, eligible patients initiate treatment at each opportunity, birth-cohort screening with universal triple therapy costs $241,100 per QALY. Assuming treatment with triple therapy, screening all individuals aged 40-64 years costs less than $100,000 per QALY.
The cost-effectiveness of one-time birth-cohort hepatitis C screening for 40-64 year olds is comparable to other screening programs, provided that the healthcare system has sufficient capacity to deliver prompt treatment and appropriate follow-on care to many newly screen-detected individuals.
目前对于慢性丙型肝炎感染者的筛查,尚没有达成共识。建议对婴儿潮一代进行出生队列筛查,仅对高危人群进行筛查,或者不进行筛查。本研究旨在评估一次性风险评估和筛查以发现之前未被诊断的 40-74 岁人群,这些人可以获得新的丙型肝炎治疗方法。
一个马尔可夫模型评估了替代风险因素指导和出生队列筛查和治疗策略。风险因素包括药物使用史、1992 年前的输血史和多个性伴侣。国家健康和营养检查调查的分析提供了按性别、种族、年龄和风险因素划分的丙型肝炎患病率和死亡率。九条策略结合了筛查(不筛查、风险因素指导筛查或出生队列筛查)和治疗(标准治疗-聚乙二醇干扰素α和利巴韦林、白细胞介素-28B 指导(IL28B)三联疗法-标准治疗加蛋白酶抑制剂或通用三联疗法)。反应指导的治疗取决于 HCV 基因型。结果包括贴现终身成本(2010 年美元)和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。与不筛查相比,50 岁人群进行风险因素指导和出生队列筛查可获得 0.7 至 3.5 个质量调整生命日,每人成本增加 168 至 568 美元。与风险因素指导筛查相比,出生队列筛查每花费一美元可获得更多的收益,如果出生队列筛查后进行通用三联疗法,其成本效益比为每 QALY 65749 美元。如果每次筛查发现的符合条件的患者都有 10%开始治疗,那么出生队列筛查加通用三联疗法的成本效益比为每 QALY 241100 美元。如果假设用三联疗法治疗,对所有 40-64 岁人群进行筛查的成本效益比低于每 QALY 100000 美元。
一次性出生队列丙型肝炎筛查对 40-64 岁人群的成本效益与其他筛查方案相当,前提是医疗保健系统有足够的能力为许多新筛查出的患者提供及时的治疗和适当的后续护理。