• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辨别技能可预测发育障碍成年人有效的偏好评估方法。

Discrimination Skills Predict Effective Preference Assessment Methods for Adults with Developmental Disabilities.

作者信息

Lee May S H, Nguyen Duong, Yu C T, Thorsteinsson Jennifer R, Martin Toby L, Martin Garry L

机构信息

University of Manitoba and St. Amant Research Centre.

出版信息

Educ Train Dev Disabil. 2008 Sep;43(3):388-396.

PMID:23536743
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3607581/
Abstract

We examined the relationship between three discrimination skills (visual, visual matching-to-sample, and auditory-visual) and four stimulus modalities (object, picture, spoken, and video) in assessing preferences of leisure activities for 7 adults with developmental disabilities. Three discrimination skills were measured using the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities Test. Three participants mastered a visual discrimination task, but not visual matching-to-sample and auditory-visual discriminations; two participants mastered visual and visual matching-to-sample discriminations, but not auditory-visual discrimination, and two participants showed all three discriminations. The most and least preferred activities, identified through paired-stimulus preference assessment using objects, were presented to each participant in each of the four modalities using a reversal design. The results showed that (1) participants with visual discrimination alone showed a preference for their preferred activities in the object modality only; (2) those with visual and visual matching-to-sample discriminations, but not auditory-visual discrimination, showed a preference for their preferred activities in the object but not in the spoken modality, and mixed results in the pictorial and video modalities; and (3) those with all three discriminations showed a preference for their preferred activities in all four modalities. These results provide partial replications of previous findings on the relationship between discriminations and object, pictorial, and spoken modalities, and extend previous research to include video stimuli.

摘要

我们研究了三种辨别技能(视觉、视觉样本匹配和视听)与四种刺激方式(物体、图片、语音和视频)之间的关系,以评估7名发育障碍成年人对休闲活动的偏好。使用基本学习能力评估测试来测量三种辨别技能。三名参与者掌握了视觉辨别任务,但未掌握视觉样本匹配和视听辨别;两名参与者掌握了视觉和视觉样本匹配辨别,但未掌握视听辨别;另外两名参与者表现出了所有三种辨别能力。通过使用物体进行配对刺激偏好评估确定的最受欢迎和最不受欢迎的活动,采用反转设计,以四种方式分别呈现给每位参与者。结果表明:(1)仅具有视觉辨别能力的参与者仅在物体方式中对其偏好的活动表现出偏好;(2)具有视觉和视觉样本匹配辨别能力但不具有视听辨别能力的参与者,在物体方式而非语音方式中对其偏好的活动表现出偏好,在图片和视频方式中的结果则参差不齐;(3)具有所有三种辨别能力的参与者在所有四种方式中对其偏好的活动都表现出偏好。这些结果部分重复了先前关于辨别与物体、图片和语音方式之间关系的研究结果,并将先前的研究扩展到包括视频刺激。

相似文献

1
Discrimination Skills Predict Effective Preference Assessment Methods for Adults with Developmental Disabilities.辨别技能可预测发育障碍成年人有效的偏好评估方法。
Educ Train Dev Disabil. 2008 Sep;43(3):388-396.
2
Predicting the relative efficacy of verbal, pictorial, and tangible stimuli for assessing preferences of leisure activities.预测言语、图片和实物刺激在评估休闲活动偏好方面的相对效果。
Am J Ment Retard. 2005 Mar;110(2):145-54. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2005)110<145:PTREOV>2.0.CO;2.
3
Tangibles, Pictures, and Verbal Descriptions: Which Should Be Used in Choice Presentations?实物、图片和文字描述:在选择展示中应使用哪一种?
J Dev Disabl. 2003;10(1):137-140.
4
The hierarchical relationship between several visual and auditory discriminations and three verbal operants among individuals with developmental disabilities.发育障碍个体中几种视觉和听觉辨别与三种言语行为之间的层级关系。
Anal Verbal Behav. 2003;19:91-105. doi: 10.1007/BF03392983.
5
Predicting the relative efficacy of three presentation methods for assessing preferences of persons with developmental disabilities.预测三种呈现方式在评估发育障碍患者偏好方面的相对有效性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Spring;35(1):49-58. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-49.
6
Assessing object-to-picture and picture-to-object matching as prerequisite skills for pictorial preference assessments.评估物体与图片及图片与物体的匹配,作为图片偏好评估的先决技能。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Winter;38(4):543-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.161-04.
7
Assessing Nonverbal Same/Different Judgments of Auditory Stimuli in Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: A Methodological Investigation.评估智力障碍个体对听觉刺激的非言语相同/不同判断:一项方法学调查。
Rev Bras Anal Comport. 2009;5(2):69-87.
8
Assessing preferences of individuals with acquired brain injury using alternative stimulus modalities.使用替代刺激方式评估获得性脑损伤患者的偏好。
Brain Inj. 2013;27(1):48-59. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.722250.
9
Examination of the relation between an assessment of skills and performance on auditory-visual conditional discriminations for children with autism spectrum disorder.对自闭症谱系障碍儿童的技能评估与视听条件辨别表现之间关系的考察。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Spring;48(1):52-70. doi: 10.1002/jaba.160. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
10
Teaching Object-Picture Matching to Improve Concordance between Object and Picture Preferences for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities: Pilot Study.通过教授物体-图片匹配来提高发育障碍个体对物体和图片偏好的一致性:试点研究
J Dev Disabl. 2009;15(1):53-64.

引用本文的文献

1
Teaching Object-Picture Matching to Improve Concordance between Object and Picture Preferences for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities: Pilot Study.通过教授物体-图片匹配来提高发育障碍个体对物体和图片偏好的一致性:试点研究
J Dev Disabl. 2009;15(1):53-64.

本文引用的文献

1
The Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities (ABLA) test predicts the relative efficacy of task preferences for persons with developmental disabilities.基本学习能力评估(ABLA)测试可预测发育障碍患者任务偏好的相对效果。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006 Jun;50(Pt 6):404-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00780.x.
2
Assessing object-to-picture and picture-to-object matching as prerequisite skills for pictorial preference assessments.评估物体与图片及图片与物体的匹配,作为图片偏好评估的先决技能。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Winter;38(4):543-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.161-04.
3
Predicting the relative efficacy of verbal, pictorial, and tangible stimuli for assessing preferences of leisure activities.预测言语、图片和实物刺激在评估休闲活动偏好方面的相对效果。
Am J Ment Retard. 2005 Mar;110(2):145-54. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2005)110<145:PTREOV>2.0.CO;2.
4
Predicting the relative efficacy of three presentation methods for assessing preferences of persons with developmental disabilities.预测三种呈现方式在评估发育障碍患者偏好方面的相对有效性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Spring;35(1):49-58. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-49.
5
Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.使用选择评估来预测强化物的有效性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):1-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-1.
6
Quality of life in applied research: a review and analysis of empirical measures.应用研究中的生活质量:实证测量的综述与分析
Am J Ment Retard. 1995 May;99(6):623-41.
7
Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.对重度智力迟钝个体的刺激偏好和强化物价值的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249-55. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249.
8
Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences.识别重度残障人士的强化物:工作人员意见与偏好的系统评估
J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;21(1):31-43. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-31.
9
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.两种为重度和极重度残疾人士识别强化物方法的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.