Kraus B B, Wu W C, Castell D O
Department of Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Jun;85(6):692-6.
We compared lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressures to parameters of acid reflux measured during 24-h pH monitoring in 81 patients being evaluated for possible reflux disease. Mid-respiratory LES pressures were significantly higher (p less than 0.05) in patients with normal amounts of reflux than in those with abnormal reflux. This difference did not occur with LES pressure measured by end-expiratory station pull-through (SPT) or rapid pull-through (RPT). There was no significant difference in total length or intra-abdominal portion of LES between the two groups. However, the product of LES pressure and total LES length was greater (p less than 0.05) for patients with normal reflux than for these with abnormal reflux. No difference was noted in the percentage of abnormal contractions in the distal esophagus between groups. These studies support the following conclusions: 1) LES pressure may be a more important protective mechanism against reflux than LES length. 2) Mid-respiratory SPT technique appears to identify the LES antireflux barrier better than either end-expiratory SPT or RPT techniques. 3) Acid exposure time seems to be a better measure of gastroesophageal reflux than the number of reflux episodes.
我们比较了81名因可能患有反流性疾病而接受评估的患者在24小时pH监测期间的食管下括约肌(LES)压力与酸反流参数。反流正常的患者呼吸中期LES压力显著高于反流异常的患者(p<0.05)。呼气末牵拉法(SPT)或快速牵拉法(RPT)测量的LES压力在两组之间没有差异。两组之间LES的总长度或腹内段长度没有显著差异。然而,反流正常的患者LES压力与LES总长度的乘积大于反流异常的患者(p<0.05)。两组之间远端食管异常收缩的百分比没有差异。这些研究支持以下结论:1)LES压力可能是比LES长度更重要的抗反流保护机制。2)呼吸中期SPT技术似乎比呼气末SPT或RPT技术能更好地识别LES抗反流屏障。3)酸暴露时间似乎比反流发作次数更能衡量胃食管反流。