George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia 20052, USA.
Qual Health Res. 2013 Jun;23(6):834-46. doi: 10.1177/1049732313482591. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
We conducted exit interviews with a random sample of 39 predominantly Central American immigrant mothers who had completed a longitudinal randomized controlled trial to prevent perinatal depression. We found that rates and levels of perinatal depression in the intervention and control groups were lower than expected and did not differ between groups at 1 year postpartum. Therefore, we conducted extensive semistructured interviews to (a) understand why these high-risk women had such low rates of major depressive episodes and depressive symptoms, and (b) determine if the mechanisms responsible for reductions in depression differed between the intervention and usual care groups. We discovered that the intervention group learned specific mood-management skills from their participation in the intervention, and that the control group experienced their participation in the study as a "low-dose" intervention. Our experience highlights the importance of conducting qualitative studies to understand quantitative outcomes of intervention studies.
我们对 39 名主要来自中美洲的移民母亲进行了随机抽样的离职面谈,这些母亲完成了一项预防围产期抑郁的纵向随机对照试验。我们发现,干预组和对照组的围产期抑郁发生率和水平均低于预期,且产后 1 年时两组之间无差异。因此,我们进行了广泛的半结构化访谈,以(a)了解为什么这些高风险妇女的重度抑郁发作和抑郁症状发生率如此低,以及(b)确定导致抑郁减少的机制在干预组和常规护理组之间是否存在差异。我们发现,干预组通过参与干预措施学习了特定的情绪管理技能,而对照组则将参与研究视为“低剂量”干预。我们的经验强调了进行定性研究以了解干预研究定量结果的重要性。