Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, & Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
J Crohns Colitis. 2013 Nov;7(10):e471-8. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.02.022. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Individuals living with IBD and a stoma are at an increased risk of anxiety and depression and it is likely that several factors mediate these relationships, including illness perceptions and coping strategies. Using the Common Sense Model (CSM), this study aimed to characterize the mediators of anxiety and depression in an IBD stoma cohort. METHODS: Eighty-three adults (23 males) with a stoma (25 ileostomy, 58 colostomy; 26 emergency, 57 planned, 55 permanent, 28 temporary) completed an online survey. Health status was measured with the Health Orientation Scale (HOS), coping styles assessed with the Carver Brief COPE scale, illness perceptions explored with the Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (BIPQ), and anxiety and depression were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: Combining the questionnaire data using structural equation modeling resulted in a final model with an excellent fit (χ(2) (11)=12.86, p=0.30, χ(2)/N=1.17, SRMR<0.05, RMSEA<0.05, GFI>0.96, CFI>0.99). Consistent with the CSM, health status directly influenced illness perceptions, which in turn, influenced coping (emotion-focused and maladaptive coping). Interestingly, months since surgery was found to influence illness perceptions and emotion-focused coping directly, but not health status. While depression was influenced by illness perceptions, emotion-focused coping and maladaptive coping, anxiety was only influenced by illness perceptions and maladaptive coping. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results provide further evidence for the complex interplay between psychological processes. In terms of directions for psychological interventions, a focus on identifying and working with illness perceptions is important.
背景与目的:患有炎症性肠病(IBD)并造瘘的个体患焦虑症和抑郁症的风险增加,而多种因素可能会影响这些关系,包括疾病认知和应对策略。本研究使用通情模型(CSM),旨在描述 IBD 造瘘患者队列中焦虑和抑郁的中介因素。
方法:83 名成年人(23 名男性)接受了造瘘(25 名回肠造口术,58 名结肠造口术;26 名急症,57 名择期,55 名永久性,28 名临时性),并完成了在线调查。健康状况采用健康取向量表(HOS)进行测量,应对方式采用 Carver 简明应对方式量表进行评估,疾病认知采用Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire(BIPQ)进行评估,焦虑和抑郁采用Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HADS)进行评估。
结果:使用结构方程模型对问卷数据进行组合,得到了一个拟合度极好的最终模型(χ²(11)=12.86,p=0.30,χ²/N=1.17,SRMR<0.05,RMSEA<0.05,GFI>0.96,CFI>0.99)。与 CSM 一致,健康状况直接影响疾病认知,进而影响应对方式(情绪聚焦和适应不良应对方式)。有趣的是,术后时间被发现直接影响疾病认知和情绪聚焦应对方式,但不影响健康状况。抑郁受疾病认知、情绪聚焦应对方式和适应不良应对方式影响,而焦虑仅受疾病认知和适应不良应对方式影响。
结论:初步结果为心理过程的复杂相互作用提供了进一步的证据。就心理干预的方向而言,关注识别和处理疾病认知非常重要。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2014
J Pers Med. 2025-3-20
J Clin Med. 2024-3-12
BMC Psychiatry. 2023-5-22