• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

把关者和推动者:药品监管者如何通过采取积极主动的态度应对充满挑战和不断变化的环境。

Gatekeepers and enablers: how drug regulators respond to a challenging and changing environment by moving toward a proactive attitude.

机构信息

Innovation Task Force, Pharmacogenomics and Nanomedicines Drafting Group, European Medicines Agency (EMA), London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013 May;93(5):425-32. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.14. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1038/clpt.2013.14
PMID:23549149
Abstract

This article analyzes the role of regulatory authorities in facilitating innovation in the pharmaceutical sector. We describe how regulators are expanding their role to be not only gatekeepers but also enablers of development. They have already responded to the challenging and changing environment by moving toward a proactive attitude beyond evaluation of products, thereby more actively contributing to their development. Regulators have to continuously evolve their knowledge and standards alongside evolution in science. Creation of supportive regulatory frameworks and multistakeholder interaction will help address unmet regulatory needs.

摘要

本文分析了监管机构在促进制药行业创新方面的作用。我们描述了监管机构如何扩大其角色,不仅成为守门员,而且成为发展的推动者。他们已经通过超越产品评估采取积极主动的态度来应对具有挑战性和不断变化的环境,从而更积极地为产品开发做出贡献。监管机构必须随着科学的发展不断更新他们的知识和标准。创建支持性的监管框架和多方利益相关者的互动将有助于解决监管需求未得到满足的问题。

相似文献

1
Gatekeepers and enablers: how drug regulators respond to a challenging and changing environment by moving toward a proactive attitude.把关者和推动者:药品监管者如何通过采取积极主动的态度应对充满挑战和不断变化的环境。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013 May;93(5):425-32. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.14. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
2
Perestroika in pharma: evolution or revolution in drug development?制药行业的改革:药物研发的进化还是革命?
Mt Sinai J Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;77(4):327-32. doi: 10.1002/msj.20198.
3
Medicines regulation and health technology assessment.药品监管与卫生技术评估。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Feb;87(2):152-4. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.261.
4
Vulnerable points in the U.S. drug-distribution system.美国药品分销系统中的薄弱环节。
Manag Care. 2004 Mar;13(3 Suppl):25-9.
5
Towards a European strategy for medicines research (2014-2020): The EUFEPS position paper on Horizon 2020.迈向欧洲药品研究战略(2014-2020 年):欧盟制药工业协会联合会关于“地平线 2020”计划的立场文件。
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2012 Dec 18;47(5):979-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2012.09.020. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
6
Early communication of drug safety concerns: a feasibility study on enhancing interaction between the pharmaceutical industry and regulators.药物安全问题的早期沟通:一项增强制药行业与监管机构互动的可行性研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Mar;19(3):232-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.1898.
7
FDA recognition of first-world drug regulators as means of relieving U.S. drug shortages.美国食品药品监督管理局认可将第一世界国家的药品监管机构作为缓解美国药品短缺的一种方式。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012 Oct 1;69(19):1626, 1628. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120478.
8
Rationale drug therapy: reasons for failure and suggestions for its implementation.合理药物治疗:失败原因及其实施建议。
Indian Pediatr. 1993 Jun;30(6):815-8.
9
What can Johnson & Johnson do to remain a giant in the health care industry?强生公司要如何做才能继续保持医疗保健行业巨头的地位?
J Hosp Mark Public Relations. 2002;14(1):93-103. doi: 10.1300/J375v14n01_08.
10
Assessment of factors associated with dose differences between Japan and the United States.评估与日本和美国之间剂量差异相关的因素。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 May;95(5):542-9. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.231. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Ensuring the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Joint Clinical Assessment in National HTA Decision-Making: Insights from the 2024 CIRS Multi-Stakeholder Workshop.确保联合临床评估在国家卫生技术评估决策中的效率和有效性:来自2024年CIRS多利益相关方研讨会的见解。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2025 Mar 3;13(1):9. doi: 10.3390/jmahp13010009. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Comparison of novel oncology drugs that received dual approval from the US accelerated approval and EU conditional marketing authorisation pathways, 2006-2021: a cross-sectional study.2006-2021 年接受美国加速批准和欧盟有条件上市许可途径双重批准的新型肿瘤药物比较:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 7;13(6):e069132. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069132.
3
Biomarkers in Medicines Development-From Discovery to Regulatory Qualification and Beyond.
药物研发中的生物标志物——从发现到监管认可及其他
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 26;9:878942. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.878942. eCollection 2022.
4
The Qualitative Value of Facilitated Regulatory Pathways in Europe, USA, and Japan: Benefits, Barriers to Utilization, and Suggested Solutions.促进监管途径的定性价值:在欧洲、美国和日本的利益、利用障碍及建议解决方案。
Pharmaceut Med. 2021 Mar;35(2):113-122. doi: 10.1007/s40290-020-00372-7. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Precision Medicine: From "Omics" to Economics towards Data-Driven Healthcare - Time for European Transformation.精准医学:从“组学”到经济学迈向数据驱动的医疗保健——欧洲变革之时。
Biomed Hub. 2017 Nov 21;2(Suppl 1):212-221. doi: 10.1159/000480117. eCollection 2017 Nov-Dec.
6
E-Synthesis: A Bayesian Framework for Causal Assessment in Pharmacosurveillance.电子合成:药物监测中因果评估的贝叶斯框架。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Dec 17;10:1317. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01317. eCollection 2019.
7
Applications of pharmacogenomics in regulatory science: a product life cycle review.药物基因组学在监管科学中的应用:产品生命周期回顾
Pharmacogenomics J. 2018 May 22;18(3):359-366. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2017.47. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
8
Nanomedicines in the EU-Regulatory Overview.欧盟纳米药物监管概述
AAPS J. 2016 Nov;18(6):1576-1582. doi: 10.1208/s12248-016-9967-1. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
9
Model-based clinical drug development in the past, present and future: a commentary.基于模型的临床药物研发的过去、现在与未来:一篇述评
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jan;79(1):108-16. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12341.
10
European Medicines Agency initiatives and perspectives on pharmacogenomics.欧洲药品管理局在药物基因组学方面的举措与展望。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;77(4):612-7. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12319.