Wisdom Jennifer P, Chor Ka Ho Brian, Hoagwood Kimberly E, Horwitz Sarah M
George Washington University, 2121 Eye Street Suite 601, Washington, DC, 20052, USA,
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014 Jul;41(4):480-502. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0486-4.
Many theoretical frameworks seek to describe the dynamic process of the implementation of innovations. Little is known, however, about factors related to decisions to adopt innovations and how the likelihood of adoption of innovations can be increased. Using a narrative synthesis approach, this paper compared constructs theorized to be related to adoption of innovations proposed in existing theoretical frameworks in order to identify characteristics likely to increase adoption of innovations. The overall goal was to identify elements across adoption frameworks that are potentially modifiable and, thus, might be employed to improve the adoption of evidence-based practices. The review identified 20 theoretical frameworks that could be grouped into two broad categories: theories that mainly address the adoption process (N = 10) and theories that address adoption within the context of implementation, diffusion, dissemination, and/or sustainability (N = 10). Constructs of leadership, operational size and structure, innovation fit with norms and values, and attitudes/motivation toward innovations each are mentioned in at least half of the theories, though there were no consistent definitions of measures for these constructs. A lack of precise definitions and measurement of constructs suggests further work is needed to increase our understanding of adoption of innovations.
许多理论框架试图描述创新实施的动态过程。然而,对于与采用创新的决策相关的因素以及如何提高创新采用的可能性,我们知之甚少。本文采用叙事综合法,比较了现有理论框架中提出的、理论上与创新采用相关的概念,以确定可能提高创新采用率的特征。总体目标是确定采用框架中潜在可修改的要素,从而可用于改进循证实践的采用情况。该综述确定了20个理论框架,可分为两大类:主要涉及采用过程的理论(N = 10)和在实施、传播、推广和/或可持续性背景下涉及采用的理论(N = 10)。领导力、运营规模和结构、创新与规范和价值观的契合度以及对创新的态度/动机等概念在至少一半的理论中都有提及,不过这些概念的测量方法没有一致的定义。缺乏对概念的精确定义和测量表明,需要进一步开展工作来增进我们对创新采用情况的理解。