Kato N, Ikeda K, Yamaki M, Tsuiki K, Yasui S
First Department of Internal Medicine, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Japan.
Jpn Heart J. 1990 Mar;31(2):145-59. doi: 10.1536/ihj.31.145.
In order to assess diastolic overload by electrocardiogram (ECG), we performed body surface ECG mapping (MAP), and then compared the results with echocardiographic, roentgenographic and cardiac catheterization findings. Eighty-seven unipolar electrocardiograms were simultaneously recorded for the following groups: 1) 40 normal subjects, 2) 46 patients with diastolic overload [32 patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) and 14 patients with mitral regurgitation (MR)]. QRS isopotential maps were constructed at 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 msec from the QRS onset. On the potential departure map, the area where the QRS voltage was greater than the normal limits (mean + 2SD of normal control) was designated as "+2SD area". In patients with diastolic overload, +2SD area was found on the left anterior chest and back at 40, 50 and 60 msec from QRS onset. Subjects were classified into the following 3 groups according to the location of their +2SD area: 1) group A (n = 23) in which the +2SD area was found on the left anterior chest and back, 2) group B (n = 17) in which the +2SD area was found only on the back, and 3) group N (n = 6) in which no +2SD area was found. Group A had a markedly greater left ventricular end-diastolic internal dimension than the other groups (A 63.6 +/- 6.8 mm, B 53.9 +/- 5.5 mm, N 50.7 +/- 6.0 mm, A vs. B, N p less than 0.01), and a greater cardiothoracic ratio than the other groups (A 58.5 +/- 5.6%, B 52.5 +/- 7.0%, N 52.3 +/- 4.7%, A vs. B, N p less than 0.01). There was no significant difference in wall thickness among the 3 groups. The regurgitation severity assessed by cardiac catheterization was greater in group A than in the other groups. Among AR patients, the +2SD area was located on the upper back and the upper anterior chest, whereas among MR patients, it tended to be located on the lower portions. The potential departure map is a useful noninvasive analytic method for determining the extent and grade of diastolic overload. Furthermore, the location of the +2SD area may be used to discriminate between AR and MR.
为了通过心电图(ECG)评估舒张期负荷过重,我们进行了体表心电图标测(MAP),然后将结果与超声心动图、X线和心导管检查结果进行比较。同时记录了以下几组的87份单极心电图:1)40名正常受试者,2)46例舒张期负荷过重患者[32例主动脉瓣反流(AR)患者和14例二尖瓣反流(MR)患者]。在QRS波起始后的10、20、30、40、50和60毫秒构建QRS等电位图。在电位偏离图上,将QRS电压大于正常范围(正常对照组平均值+2标准差)的区域指定为“+2标准差区域”。在舒张期负荷过重患者中,在QRS波起始后40、50和60毫秒时,在左前胸和背部发现了+2标准差区域。根据+2标准差区域的位置,将受试者分为以下3组:1)A组(n = 23),在左前胸和背部发现+2标准差区域;2)B组(n = 17),仅在背部发现+2标准差区域;3)N组(n = 6),未发现+2标准差区域。A组的左心室舒张末期内径明显大于其他组(A组63.6±6.8毫米,B组53.9±5.5毫米,N组50.7±6.0毫米,A组与B组、N组比较,p<0.01),心胸比率也大于其他组(A组58.5±5.6%,B组52.5±7.0%,N组52.3±4.7%,A组与B组、N组比较,p<0.01)。3组之间的壁厚无显著差异。心导管检查评估的反流严重程度在A组高于其他组。在AR患者中,+2标准差区域位于上背部和上前胸,而在MR患者中,它倾向于位于下部。电位偏离图是一种用于确定舒张期负荷过重程度和分级的有用的非侵入性分析方法。此外,+2标准差区域的位置可用于区分AR和MR。