Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
PLoS Genet. 2013 Mar;9(3):e1003386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003386. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
Telomeres distinguish chromosome ends from double-strand breaks (DSBs) and prevent chromosome fusion. However, telomeres can also interfere with DNA repair, as shown by a deficiency in nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and an increase in large deletions at telomeric DSBs. The sensitivity of telomeric regions to DSBs is important in the cellular response to ionizing radiation and oncogene-induced replication stress, either by preventing cell division in normal cells, or by promoting chromosome instability in cancer cells. We have previously proposed that the telomeric protein TRF2 causes the sensitivity of telomeric regions to DSBs, either through its inhibition of ATM, or by promoting the processing of DSBs as though they are telomeres, which is independent of ATM. Our current study addresses the mechanism responsible for the deficiency in repair of DSBs near telomeres by combining assays for large deletions, NHEJ, small deletions, and gross chromosome rearrangements (GCRs) to compare the types of events resulting from DSBs at interstitial and telomeric DSBs. Our results confirm the sensitivity of telomeric regions to DSBs by demonstrating that the frequency of GCRs is greatly increased at DSBs near telomeres and that the role of ATM in DSB repair is very different at interstitial and telomeric DSBs. Unlike at interstitial DSBs, a deficiency in ATM decreases NHEJ and small deletions at telomeric DSBs, while it increases large deletions. These results strongly suggest that ATM is functional near telomeres and is involved in end protection at telomeric DSBs, but is not required for the extensive resection at telomeric DSBs. The results support our model in which the deficiency in DSB repair near telomeres is a result of ATM-independent processing of DSBs as though they are telomeres, leading to extensive resection, telomere loss, and GCRs involving alternative NHEJ.
端粒将染色体末端与双链断裂 (DSB) 区分开来,并防止染色体融合。然而,端粒也会干扰 DNA 修复,这表现在非同源末端连接 (NHEJ) 的缺陷和端粒 DSB 处的大片段缺失增加。端粒区域对 DSB 的敏感性在细胞对电离辐射和致癌基因诱导的复制应激的反应中很重要,无论是通过防止正常细胞的分裂,还是通过促进癌细胞中的染色体不稳定性。我们之前提出,端粒蛋白 TRF2 导致端粒区域对 DSB 的敏感性,这既可以通过抑制 ATM 来实现,也可以通过促进 DSB 的处理,使其看起来像端粒,而这与 ATM 无关。我们目前的研究通过结合大缺失、NHEJ、小缺失和染色体严重重排 (GCR) 的检测,来比较间质和端粒 DSB 处 DSB 产生的事件类型,以解决端粒附近 DSB 修复缺陷的机制。我们的结果通过证明端粒附近 DSB 处 GCR 的频率大大增加,以及 ATM 在间质和端粒 DSB 处 DSB 修复中的作用非常不同,证实了端粒区域对 DSB 的敏感性。与间质 DSB 不同,ATM 的缺陷会降低端粒 DSB 处的 NHEJ 和小缺失,而增加大片段缺失。这些结果强烈表明,ATM 在端粒附近是有功能的,并且参与端粒 DSB 的末端保护,但不需要在端粒 DSB 处进行广泛的切除。这些结果支持我们的模型,即端粒附近 DSB 修复的缺陷是 ATM 不依赖的 DSB 处理的结果,就像它们是端粒一样,导致广泛的切除、端粒丢失和涉及替代 NHEJ 的 GCRs。
Nature. 2009-8-13
DNA Repair (Amst). 2011-4-3
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015-9-18
Nat Cell Biol. 2011-8-21
Mol Cell Biol. 2008-9
Int J Mol Sci. 2023-10-16
NAR Cancer. 2020-9
Front Oncol. 2012-10-4
Mol Cell. 2012-8-24
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012-8-13
J Cell Biol. 2012-8-6