Francisconi Manoela-Fávaro, Janson Guilherme, Henriques José-Fernando-Castanha, Freitas Karina-Maria-Salvatore, Francisconi Paulo-Afonso-Silveira
D.D.S., M.Sc. Orthodontic Graduate Student. Department of Orthodontics. Bauru Dental School. University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
D.D.S., M.Sc., Ph.D. Professor and Head. Department of Orthodontics. Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 May 1;11(5):e464-e469. doi: 10.4317/jced.55698. eCollection 2019 May.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the deflection forces of 0.016-inch Nitinol and stainless steel orthodontic wires, in association to different self-ligating brackets.
Specimens were mounted in a clinical simulation model and evaluated in a Universal Testing Machine (INSTRON 3342), using a 10N load cell and ISO 15,841, as a protocol. Eight of these models were prepared, each one for the bonding of each set of self-ligating accessories to be tested: Damon Q, Damon Clear (Ormco), In-Ovation R, In-Ovation C (GAC), BioQuick, QuickClear (Forestadent), SmartClip and Clarity SL (3M). Data were subjected to One-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey tests (<0.05).
Elastic deflection results showed that the deactivation forces increased with increase in wire deflection in the different brackets evaluated. For the different combinations, Clarity SL generated the greatest force and Damon Clear presented the lowest force when compared to the other brackets in all alloys and deflections. BioQuick and QuicKlear were those with the most similar behavior with each other.
Strength values increased with gradual increase in wire deflection in all evaluated brackets. Clarity SL generated the greatest and Damon Clear the lowest force when compared to the other brackets in all alloys and deflections tested. Brackets, orthodontic wires, deflection.
本研究旨在评估0.016英寸镍钛合金和不锈钢正畸丝与不同自锁托槽相关的挠曲力。
将标本安装在临床模拟模型中,并在万能试验机(INSTRON 3342)上进行评估,使用10N的测力传感器并遵循ISO 15841标准。制备了8个这样的模型,每个模型用于将每组待测试的自锁附件进行粘接:Damon Q、Damon Clear(奥美科)、In-Ovation R、In-Ovation C(GAC)、BioQuick、QuickClear(Forestadent)、SmartClip和Clarity SL(3M)。数据进行单向方差分析,随后进行Tukey检验(<0.05)。
弹性挠曲结果表明,在评估的不同托槽中,随着丝的挠曲增加,去激活力也增加。对于不同的组合,在所有合金和挠曲情况下,与其他托槽相比,Clarity SL产生的力最大,Damon Clear产生的力最小。BioQuick和QuickClear的行为彼此最为相似。
在所有评估的托槽中,强度值随着丝挠曲的逐渐增加而增加。在所有测试的合金和挠曲情况下,与其他托槽相比,Clarity SL产生的力最大,Damon Clear产生的力最小。托槽;正畸丝;挠曲。