• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结扎方法对不同二阶角度舌侧托槽摩擦力的影响:一项体外研究。

Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: an in vitro study.

作者信息

Pereira Graziane Olímpio, Gimenez Carla Maria Melleiro, Prieto Lucas, Prieto Marcos Gabriel do Lago, Basting Roberta Tarkany

机构信息

Research Assistant, São Leopoldo Mandic, Department of Dental Material and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry and Research Institute, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Professor, Universidade de Araras (UNIARARAS), Department of Orthodontics, Araras, São Paulo Brazil. Universidade Estadual Paulista (FOA-UNESP), School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Jul-Aug;21(4):34-40. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oar.

DOI:10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oar
PMID:27653262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5029314/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate stainless steel archwire static friction in active and passive self-ligating lingual and conventional brackets with second-order angulations.

METHODS

Two conventional lingual brackets for canines (STb light/Ormco; PSWb/Tecnident), and two self-ligating brackets, one active (In-Ovation L/GAC) and the other passive (3D/ Forestadent), were evaluated. A stainless steel archwire was used at 0°, 3° and 5° angulations. Metal ligatures, conventional elastic ligatures, and low friction elastic ligatures were also tested. A universal testing machine applied friction between brackets and wires, simulating sliding mechanics, to produce 2-mm sliding at 3 mm/minute speed.

RESULTS

Two-way analysis of variance demonstrated a significant effect of the interaction between brackets and angulations (p < 0.001). Tukey test indicated that the highest frictional resistance values were observed at 5° angulation for In-Ovation L, PSWb bracket with non conventional ligature, and STb bracket with metal ligature. As for 3D, PSWb with conventional or metal ligatures, and STb brackets with non conventional ligature, showed significantly lower static frictional resistance with 0° angulation. At 0° angulation, STb brackets with metal ties, In-Ovation L brackets and 3D brackets had the lowest frictional resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

As the angulation increased from 0° to 3°, static friction resistance increased. When angulation increased from 3° to 5°, static friction resistance increased or remained the same. Self-ligating 3D and In-Ovation L brackets, as well as conventional STb brackets, seem to be the best option when sliding mechanics is used to perform lingual orthodontic treatment.

摘要

目的

评估不锈钢弓丝在具有二级角度的主动和被动自锁舌侧及传统托槽中的静摩擦力。

方法

评估了两种用于犬齿的传统舌侧托槽(STb light/奥美科;PSWb/特奈登),以及两种自锁托槽,一种是主动式(In-Ovation L/美国GAC国际公司),另一种是被动式(3D/弗罗斯塔登特)。使用了角度为0°、3°和5°的不锈钢弓丝。还测试了金属结扎丝、传统弹性结扎丝和低摩擦弹性结扎丝。一台万能试验机在托槽和弓丝之间施加摩擦力,模拟滑动力学,以3毫米/分钟的速度产生2毫米的滑动。

结果

双向方差分析表明托槽和角度之间的相互作用具有显著影响(p < 0.001)。 Tukey检验表明,对于In-Ovation L托槽、使用非传统结扎丝的PSWb托槽以及使用金属结扎丝的STb托槽,在5°角度时观察到最高的摩擦阻力值。至于3D托槽、使用传统或金属结扎丝的PSWb托槽以及使用非传统结扎丝的STb托槽,在0°角度时显示出显著较低的静摩擦阻力。在0°角度时,使用金属结扎丝的STb托槽、In-Ovation L托槽和3D托槽具有最低的摩擦阻力。

结论

随着角度从0°增加到3°,静摩擦阻力增加。当角度从3°增加到5°时,静摩擦阻力增加或保持不变。当使用滑动力学进行舌侧正畸治疗时,自锁3D和In-Ovation L托槽以及传统STb托槽似乎是最佳选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec49/5029314/37b1523f9f6d/2176-9451-dpjo-21-04-00034-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec49/5029314/6946d303a7a8/2176-9451-dpjo-21-04-00034-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec49/5029314/37b1523f9f6d/2176-9451-dpjo-21-04-00034-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec49/5029314/6946d303a7a8/2176-9451-dpjo-21-04-00034-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec49/5029314/37b1523f9f6d/2176-9451-dpjo-21-04-00034-gf2.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: an in vitro study.结扎方法对不同二阶角度舌侧托槽摩擦力的影响:一项体外研究。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Jul-Aug;21(4):34-40. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oar.
2
Friction between various self-ligating brackets and archwire couples during sliding mechanics.滑动矫治力学过程中各种自锁托槽与弓丝组合之间的摩擦力。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Oct;138(4):463-467. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.029.
3
In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance with 5 ligation methods and Gianelly-type working wires.5 种结扎方法和 Gianelly 型工作丝的体外评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jul;138(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.023.
4
Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states.自结扎托槽与传统不锈钢双翼托槽在干燥和湿润(唾液)状态下带有二阶角度时的抗滑动性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Oct;120(4):361-70. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.116090.
5
Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.不同结扎系统的自锁托槽和传统托槽的摩擦行为
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jul;77(4):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0035-3. Epub 2016 May 24.
6
A comparative in vitro study of frictional resistance between lingual brackets and stainless steel archwires.一种舌侧托槽和不锈钢方丝之间摩擦力的体外对比研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Feb;34(1):119-25. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq180. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
7
An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.不同尺寸弓丝与传统不锈钢及自锁不锈钢托槽在多种托槽-弓丝组合方式下摩擦特性的体外评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Aug 1;18(8):660-664. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2102.
8
Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.自锁托槽与传统托槽在不同托槽-弓丝角度组合中的摩擦阻力。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Jun;22(3):228-34. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130665.
9
Frictional resistance exerted by different lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.不同舌侧和唇侧托槽产生的摩擦力:一项体外研究。
Prog Orthod. 2013 Oct 18;14:37. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-37.
10
A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.自锁式与传统正畸托槽系统的比较。
Br J Orthod. 1997 Nov;24(4):309-17. doi: 10.1093/ortho/24.4.309.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Evaluation of a New Orthodontic Ligature: Frictional Force Analysis.一种新型正畸结扎丝的研制与评估:摩擦力分析
Eur J Dent. 2024 Feb;18(1):265-272. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768471. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
2
The Effect of Ligature Type on Lateral Tooth Movement during Orthodontic Treatment with Lingual Appliances-An In Vitro Study.结扎类型对舌侧矫治器正畸治疗中牙齿侧向移动的影响——一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 May 7;15(9):3365. doi: 10.3390/ma15093365.
3
investigation of the mechanical friction properties of a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing lingual bracket system under diverse tooth displacement condition.

本文引用的文献

1
In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics.不同舌侧托槽在滑动机制中的性能体外评估。
J Orthod Sci. 2015 Jan-Mar;4(1):19-25. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.149612.
2
Comparison of frictional resistance between self-ligating and conventional brackets tied with elastomeric and metal ligature in orthodontic archwires.正畸弓丝中自锁托槽与使用弹性结扎和金属结扎的传统托槽之间摩擦阻力的比较。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 May-Jun;19(3):114-9. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.114-119.oar.
3
Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
在不同牙齿位移条件下对计算机辅助设计与计算机辅助制造舌侧托槽系统的机械摩擦性能进行研究。
Korean J Orthod. 2019 Mar;49(2):73-80. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2019.49.2.73. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
4
Debonding forces of different pads in a lingual bracket system.舌侧托槽系统中不同托垫的脱粘力
Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Jul-Aug;22(4):34-40. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.4.034-040.oar.
传统自锁托槽和自锁托槽在复杂牙齿矫正中的力水平比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Apr;143(4):507-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.020.
4
Frictional resistance of orthodontic wires tied with 3 types of elastomeric ligatures.三种正畸橡皮圈结扎丝的摩擦力。
Braz Oral Res. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):526-30. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242011005000015.
5
Evaluation of the friction of self-ligating and conventional bracket systems.自锁托槽系统与传统托槽系统摩擦力的评估。
Eur J Dent. 2011 Jul;5(3):310-7.
6
An in vitro comparison of the frictional forces between archwires and self-ligating brackets of passive and active types.一种被动式和主动式自锁托槽弓丝摩擦力的体外比较。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Oct;34(5):625-32. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr065. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
7
Frictional characteristics of the newer orthodontic elastomeric ligatures.新型正畸弹性结扎丝的摩擦特性
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Jan-Feb;22(1):95-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.80005.
8
Comparative evaluation of frictional characteristics of coated low friction ligatures - Super Slick Ties with conventional uncoated ligatures.涂层低摩擦结扎线——超级顺滑结扎线与传统未涂层结扎线摩擦特性的比较评估。
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Jan-Feb;22(1):90-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.80004.
9
Friction properties according to vertical and horizontal tooth displacement and bracket type during initial leveling and alignment.在初始整平及排齐阶段,根据垂直及水平牙齿位移和托槽类型来评估摩擦特性。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Jul;81(4):653-61. doi: 10.2319/072310-431.1. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
10
A comparative in vitro study of frictional resistance between lingual brackets and stainless steel archwires.一种舌侧托槽和不锈钢方丝之间摩擦力的体外对比研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Feb;34(1):119-25. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq180. Epub 2011 Jan 13.