Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3850, 2400 Pratt Street, Room 7039, North Pavilion, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Diabetologia. 2013 Jun;56(6):1226-35. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2890-4. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Clinical trials assessing interventions for treating and preventing diabetes mellitus and its complications are needed to inform evidence-based practice. To examine whether current studies adequately address these needs, we conducted a descriptive analysis of diabetes-related trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov from 2007 to 2010.
From a dataset including 96,346 studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov downloaded on 27 September, 2010, a subset of 2,484 interventional trials was created by selecting trials with disease condition terms relevant to diabetes.
Of the diabetes-related trials, 74.8% had a primarily therapeutic purpose while 10% were preventive. Listed interventions included drugs (63.1%) and behavioural (11.7%). Most trials were designed to enrol ≤ 500 (91.1%) or ≤ 100 (58.6%) participants, with mean/median times to completion of 1.8/1.4 years. Small percentages of trials targeted persons aged ≤ 18 years (3.7%) or ≥ 65 years (0.6%), while 30.8% excluded patients >65 years and the majority excluded those >75 years. Funding sources included industry (50.9%), NIH (7.5%) or other, with most being single-centre trials of other sponsorship (37.7%) or industry-funded multicentre studies (27.4%). A small number of trials (1.4%) listed primary outcomes including mortality or clinically significant cardiovascular complications. The distribution of trials by global region and US state does not correlate with prevalence of diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The majority of diabetes-related trials include small numbers of participants, exclude those at the extremes of age, are of short duration, involve drug therapy rather than preventive or non-drug interventions and do not focus upon significant cardiovascular outcomes. Recently registered diabetes trials may not sufficiently address important diabetes care issues or involve affected populations.
目的/假设:为了提供循证实践依据,需要评估治疗和预防糖尿病及其并发症的干预措施的临床试验。为了检查当前的研究是否充分满足这些需求,我们对 2007 年至 2010 年期间在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册的与糖尿病相关的试验进行了描述性分析。
从 2010 年 9 月 27 日下载的包括 ClinicalTrials.gov 中 96346 项研究的数据集,通过选择与糖尿病相关的疾病条件术语的试验,创建了一个包含 2484 项干预性试验的子集。
在所研究的糖尿病相关试验中,74.8%的试验主要具有治疗目的,10%的试验具有预防目的。列出的干预措施包括药物(63.1%)和行为(11.7%)。大多数试验的目标是招募≤500 人(91.1%)或≤100 人(58.6%),完成试验的平均/中位数时间为 1.8/1.4 年。只有小比例的试验针对≤18 岁(3.7%)或≥65 岁(0.6%)的人群,而 30.8%的试验排除了 65 岁以上的患者,大多数试验排除了 75 岁以上的患者。资金来源包括工业界(50.9%)、NIH(7.5%)或其他来源,其中大多数为其他赞助的单中心试验(37.7%)或工业资助的多中心研究(27.4%)。少数试验(1.4%)列出了包括死亡率或临床显著心血管并发症在内的主要结果。按全球区域和美国州划分的试验分布与糖尿病的流行情况没有相关性。
结论/解释:大多数与糖尿病相关的试验纳入的参与者数量较少,排除了年龄极端的患者,试验持续时间较短,涉及药物治疗而非预防或非药物干预,并且不关注重要的心血管结局。最近注册的糖尿病试验可能不能充分解决重要的糖尿病护理问题或涉及受影响的人群。