• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检索在学习新信息中的干扰效应。

Interfering effects of retrieval in learning new information.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1665-81. doi: 10.1037/a0032377. Epub 2013 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1037/a0032377
PMID:23565780
Abstract

In 7 experiments, we explored the role of retrieval in associative updating, that is, in incorporating new information into an associative memory. We tested the hypothesis that retrieval would facilitate incorporating a new contextual detail into a learned association. Participants learned 3 pieces of information-a person's face, name, and profession (in Experiments 1-5). In the 1st phase, participants in all conditions learned faces and names. In the 2nd phase, participants either restudied the face-name pair (the restudy condition) or were given the face and asked to retrieve the name (the test condition). In the 3rd phase, professions were presented for study just after restudy or testing. Our prediction was that the new information (the profession) would be more readily learned following retrieval of the face-name association compared to restudy of the face-name association. However, we found that the act of retrieval generally undermined acquisition of new associations rather than facilitating them. This detrimental effect emerged on both immediate and delayed tests. Further, the effect was not due to selective attention to feedback because we found impairment whether or not feedback was provided after the Phase 2 test. The data are novel in showing that the act of retrieving information can inhibit the ability to learn new information shortly thereafter. The results are difficult to accommodate within current theories that mostly emphasize benefits of retrieval for learning.

摘要

在 7 项实验中,我们探讨了检索在联想更新中的作用,即把新信息纳入联想记忆中。我们检验了这样一个假设:检索会促进将新的语境细节纳入已学习的联想中。参与者学习了 3 条信息——一个人的脸、名字和职业(实验 1-5)。在第一阶段,所有条件下的参与者都学习了脸和名字。在第二阶段,参与者要么复习脸-名对(复习条件),要么只看脸并要求检索名字(测试条件)。在第三阶段,职业在复习或测试后立即呈现供学习。我们的预测是,与复习脸-名联想相比,检索脸-名联想会更容易学习新信息(职业)。然而,我们发现检索行为通常会破坏新联想的习得,而不是促进它们。这种不利影响在即时和延迟测试中都出现了。此外,这种影响不是由于对反馈的选择性注意造成的,因为我们发现,无论是否在第二阶段测试后提供反馈,都会出现损害。这些数据是新颖的,表明检索信息的行为会抑制随后不久学习新信息的能力。这些结果很难被当前主要强调检索对学习有益的理论所解释。

相似文献

1
Interfering effects of retrieval in learning new information.检索在学习新信息中的干扰效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1665-81. doi: 10.1037/a0032377. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
2
Effects of aging on hippocampal and anterior temporal activations during successful retrieval of memory for face-name associations.年龄对成功回忆面孔-名字联想记忆时海马和前颞叶激活的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jan;23(1):200-13. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21476.
3
Adult age differences in memory for name-face associations: The effects of intentional and incidental learning.成年人在姓名-面孔联想记忆方面的年龄差异:有意学习和附带学习的影响。
Memory. 2009 Feb;17(2):220-32. doi: 10.1080/09658210802222183.
4
Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval.测试和反馈对后期检索前端控制的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Mar;39(2):437-50. doi: 10.1037/a0028886. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
5
Face-name association learning in early Alzheimer's disease: a comparison of learning methods and their underlying mechanisms.早期阿尔茨海默病中的面孔-名字联想学习:学习方法及其潜在机制的比较
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008 Jun;18(3):343-71. doi: 10.1080/09602010701694723.
6
Retrieval practice: a simple strategy for improving memory after traumatic brain injury.检索练习:创伤性脑损伤后改善记忆的简单策略。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 Nov;16(6):1147-50. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710001128. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
7
Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.为什么测试-再学习练习对记忆有益?对中介转移假设的评估。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):737-46. doi: 10.1037/a0026166. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
8
Retrieval opportunities while multitasking improve name recall.多任务处理时的检索机会能提高名字回忆能力。
Memory. 2008 Nov;16(8):896-909. doi: 10.1080/09658210802360611. Epub 2008 Sep 27.
9
Errorless learning and spaced retrieval: how do these methods fare in healthy and clinical populations?无错学习和间隔检索:这些方法在健康人群和临床人群中效果如何?
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Apr;33(4):432-47. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2010.533155. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
10
Age differences in memory for names: the effect of prelearned semantic associations.年龄对名字记忆的影响:预学习语义联想的作用。
Psychol Aging. 2012 Jun;27(2):462-73. doi: 10.1037/a0025194. Epub 2011 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
In-lecture quizzes improve online learning for university and community college students.课堂测验可改善大学生和社区学院学生的在线学习效果。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Apr 3;3(1):54. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00234-5.
2
Errorful learning of trivia questions and answers: The role of study time.琐事问答的错误学习:学习时间的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Apr;53(3):804-819. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01608-6. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
3
Retrieval Practice Enhances New Learning but does Not Affect Performance in Subsequent Arithmetic Tasks.检索练习可增强新的学习效果,但不影响后续算术任务的表现。
J Cogn. 2022 Mar 22;5(1):22. doi: 10.5334/joc.216. eCollection 2022.
4
Can we learn from errors? Retrieval facilitates the correction of false memories for pragmatic inferences.我们能从错误中学习吗?检索有助于纠正语用推理中的错误记忆。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 2;17(8):e0272427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272427. eCollection 2022.
5
Testing improves performance as well as assesses learning: A review of the testing effect with implications for models of learning.测试既可以提高表现,也可以评估学习:测试效应综述及其对学习模型的启示。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2022 Jul;48(3):222-241. doi: 10.1037/xan0000323. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
6
The Effect of Forward Testing as a Function of Test Occasions and Study Material.作为测试次数和学习材料函数的前向测试效应。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Aug 24;11(9):114. doi: 10.3390/bs11090114.
7
Enhancing learning and retrieval of new information: a review of the forward testing effect.增强新信息的学习与检索:正向测试效应综述
NPJ Sci Learn. 2018 Apr 11;3:8. doi: 10.1038/s41539-018-0024-y. eCollection 2018.
8
Group discussions and test-enhanced learning: individual learning outcomes and personality characteristics.小组讨论与测试强化学习:个体学习成果与人格特征
Educ Psychol (Lond). 2017 Feb 7;37(2):145-156. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2016.1143087. Epub 2016 Feb 18.