Van Beeck A, Clockaerts S, Somville J, Van Heeswijk J H W, Van Glabbeek F, Bos P K, Reijman M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Knee. 2013 Aug;20(4):226-31. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
The infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) is often removed during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). No evidence based guidelines on changes in clinical outcome have yet been described. The aim of this review is to investigate whether regular removal of the IPFP during TKA should be performed.
Seven databases were systematically searched. Clinical studies, in which TKA with IPFP resection was compared with IPFP preservation, were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane collaboration tool. Studies reporting anterior knee pain, patellar tendon length, range of motion, patellar vascularisation or functional outcome were included.
The indication for TKA varied in the different studies: osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatic arthritis (RA) and multiple indications (OA, RA and osteonecrosis). After IPFP resection: 1. For OA, no differences in function, range of motion, and anterior knee pain were found. 2. In the RA study, there was a trend towards more discomfort and a decrease in function. 3. In OA and RA patients a decrease in patellar tendon length was observed. 4. One study reported no decrease in patellar vascularisation.
Limitations of this review are the high risk of bias scores of the included studies, the varying outcome measures, follow up, number and type of participants. Randomised clinical trials are required to support or refute the results, contributing to a possible future evidence based guideline on IPFP resection during TKA.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)中常切除髌下脂肪垫(IPFP)。目前尚无基于证据的关于临床结果变化的指南。本综述的目的是研究在TKA期间常规切除IPFP是否应该进行。
系统检索了七个数据库。纳入了将切除IPFP的TKA与保留IPFP的TKA进行比较的临床研究。使用Cochrane协作工具评估偏倚风险。纳入报告膝关节前疼痛、髌腱长度、活动范围、髌骨血管化或功能结果的研究。
不同研究中TKA的适应症有所不同:骨关节炎(OA)、风湿性关节炎(RA)和多种适应症(OA、RA和骨坏死)。切除IPFP后:1. 对于OA,在功能、活动范围和膝关节前疼痛方面未发现差异。2. 在RA研究中,有更多不适和功能下降的趋势。3. 在OA和RA患者中观察到髌腱长度缩短。4. 一项研究报告髌骨血管化未减少。
本综述的局限性在于纳入研究的偏倚评分风险高、结局测量、随访、参与者数量和类型各不相同。需要随机临床试验来支持或反驳这些结果,为未来可能的关于TKA期间IPFP切除的循证指南做出贡献。