• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Considerations for an institution for evaluation of diabetes technology devices to improve their quality in the European Union.关于在欧盟设立糖尿病技术设备评估机构以提高其质量的考量。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Mar 1;7(2):542-7. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700230.
2
System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197.根据DIN EN ISO 15197标准对43款血糖自我监测血糖仪系统进行系统准确性评估。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Sep 1;6(5):1060-75. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600510.
3
Legal regulation of the production and trade of medical devices and medical equipment in the EU and US: experience for Ukraine.欧盟和美国医疗器械及医疗设备生产与贸易的法律监管:乌克兰的经验
Wiad Lek. 2017;70(3 pt 2):614-618.
4
Medical device regulation for manufacturers.针对制造商的医疗器械监管
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2003;217(6):459-67. doi: 10.1243/09544110360729090.
5
[Introduction of innovative high-risk medical devices in Europe: are clinical efficacy and safety guaranteed?].[欧洲创新型高风险医疗器械的引入:临床疗效和安全性有保障吗?]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2013 Apr;61(2):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2012.08.004. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
6
Obtaining reimbursement in France and Italy for new diabetes products.在法国和意大利获取新型糖尿病产品的报销。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jan;9(1):156-61. doi: 10.1177/1932296814561288.
7
Neither protective nor harmonized: the crossborder regulation of medical devices in the EU.既无保护亦无协调:欧盟的医疗器械跨境监管。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2021 Jan;16(1):51-63. doi: 10.1017/S1744133120000158. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
8
[Medical devices industry: the problem of clinical evaluation reports].[医疗器械行业:临床评估报告的问题]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2019 Oct 1;77(5):514-516. doi: 10.1684/abc.2019.1473.
9
CE marking--what does it really mean?
J Tissue Viability. 1999 Jan;9(1):11-5. doi: 10.1016/s0965-206x(99)80004-7.
10
Diabetes device reimbursement in the EU-5.欧盟五国的糖尿病设备报销情况。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Jul 1;7(4):1084-92. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700433.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of a novel calibratable real-time continuous glucose monitoring device based on FreeStyle libre in- and out-of-hospital.一种基于FreeStyle libre的新型可校准实时连续血糖监测设备在院内外的准确性。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 22;16:1466358. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1466358. eCollection 2025.
2
Flash glucose monitoring system in gestational diabetes: a study of accuracy and usability.妊娠期糖尿病中的即时血糖监测系统:一项准确性和可用性研究。
Hormones (Athens). 2023 Dec;22(4):703-713. doi: 10.1007/s42000-023-00485-z. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
3
System Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation of an Improved System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.血糖自我监测改进系统的系统准确性和用户性能评估
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Mar;12(2):407-411. doi: 10.1177/1932296817752958. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
4
Analytical Performance Requirements for Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Focus on System Accuracy: Relevant Differences Among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and Current FDA Recommendations.以系统准确性为重点的血糖自我监测系统的分析性能要求:ISO 15197:2003、ISO 15197:2013与美国食品药品监督管理局当前建议之间的相关差异
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):885-94. doi: 10.1177/1932296815580160. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
5
Quality of HbA1c Measurement in the Practice: The German Perspective.实践中糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测的质量:德国视角
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 May;9(3):687-95. doi: 10.1177/1932296815572254. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
6
Effective assessment of diabetes control using personal glucometers (CONTOURLINK, Bayer, Germany; CALLA, Wellion, Austria; LINUS, Agamatrix, USA).使用个人血糖仪(德国拜耳 CONTOURLINK、奥地利威朗 CALLA、美国爱奥乐 LINUS)有效评估糖尿病控制情况。
Dis Markers. 2013;35(6):895-905. doi: 10.1155/2013/702427.
7
Freedom of speech and science: can companies force us to withdraw data they don't like?言论自由与科学:企业能否迫使我们撤回他们不喜欢的数据?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Sep 1;7(5):1100-1. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700501.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance variability of seven commonly used self-monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers.七种常用血糖自我监测系统的性能变异性:患者和医护人员的临床考量
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Jan 1;7(1):144-52. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700117.
2
Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197.根据ISO 15197标准,血糖检测试纸的批间差异及自我血糖监测系统的准确性评估。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Sep 1;6(5):1076-86. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600511.
3
System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197.根据DIN EN ISO 15197标准对43款血糖自我监测血糖仪系统进行系统准确性评估。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Sep 1;6(5):1060-75. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600510.
4
Regulation of medical devices used in diabetology in Europe: time for reform?欧洲糖尿病学中使用的医疗器械监管:是时候改革了吗?
Diabetologia. 2012 Aug;55(8):2295-7. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2580-7. Epub 2012 May 16.
5
Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices.临床评估血糖仪的准确性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Apr;28(4):525-31. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.673479. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
6
Self-monitoring of blood glucose with a focus on analytical quality: an overview.自我血糖监测:关注分析质量。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010 Jul;48(7):963-72. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2010.186.
7
System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197.根据 DIN EN ISO 15197 评估 27 个血糖监测系统的系统准确性。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010 Mar;12(3):221-31. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0128.
8
Measurement quality of blood glucose meters: is there a need for an institution with an unbiased view?血糖仪的测量质量:是否需要一个持公正观点的机构?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007 Mar;1(2):178-80. doi: 10.1177/193229680700100207.
9
Standardized evaluation of nine instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose.九种血糖自我监测仪器的标准化评估
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Dec;10(6):467-77. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0034.

关于在欧盟设立糖尿病技术设备评估机构以提高其质量的考量。

Considerations for an institution for evaluation of diabetes technology devices to improve their quality in the European Union.

作者信息

Heinemann Lutz, Freckmann Guido, Koschinsky Theodor

机构信息

Science & Co, Kehler Str. 24, Düsseldorf 40468, Germany.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Mar 1;7(2):542-7. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700230.

DOI:10.1177/193229681300700230
PMID:23567012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3737655/
Abstract

All medical devices used for self-monitoring of blood glucose (BG), insulin injection, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, and continuous glucose monitoring in the European Union (EU) must have a Communauté Européenne (CE) mark. However, the approval process for obtaining this mark is different from that used by the European Medicines Agency in the EU for drugs or by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States for such medical and in vitro diagnostic devices. The notified bodies involved in the CE mark process perform this evaluation in cooperation with the manufacturers. They have only limited diabetes know-how; they have to handle all kinds of medical devices. There are devices for therapy on the market in the EU (i.e., they have market approval) that do not fulfill quality requirements, as indicated, for example, in the international norm ISO 15197 for BG test systems. Evaluation of the performance of such systems is usually provided by the manufacturers. What is missing in the EU is an independent institution that performs regular and critical evaluation of the quality of devices used for diabetes therapy before and also after their market approval. The work of such an institution would focus on BG test systems (these represent two-thirds of the market of medical devices for diabetes treatment) but would also evaluate the performance of other devices. It has to be clarified what legal framework is required for such an institution and how it can be financed; probably this can be done in a shared manner by the manufacturers of such devices and the health insurance companies. Positive evaluation results should be a prerequisite prior to any reimbursement for such devices.

摘要

在欧盟,所有用于自我血糖监测(BG)、胰岛素注射、持续皮下胰岛素输注以及持续葡萄糖监测的医疗设备都必须有欧洲共同体(CE)标志。然而,获得该标志的审批流程不同于欧盟内欧洲药品管理局对药品的审批流程,也不同于美国食品药品监督管理局对这类医疗和体外诊断设备的审批流程。参与CE标志流程的公告机构与制造商合作进行此项评估。他们在糖尿病方面的专业知识有限,却要处理各类医疗设备。欧盟市场上存在一些已获得市场批准的治疗用设备,但并不符合质量要求,例如国际标准ISO 15197对BG检测系统的要求。此类系统的性能评估通常由制造商提供。欧盟所缺少的是一个独立机构,该机构在糖尿病治疗用设备上市前和上市后都能对其质量进行定期且严格的评估。这样一个机构的工作将聚焦于BG检测系统(这类系统占糖尿病治疗医疗设备市场的三分之二),但也会评估其他设备的性能。必须明确这样一个机构需要怎样的法律框架以及如何获得资金支持;或许可以由这类设备的制造商和健康保险公司共同来完成。积极的评估结果应作为此类设备报销的前提条件。