Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Columbia University, Department, New York, New York, USA.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2021 Jan;16(1):51-63. doi: 10.1017/S1744133120000158. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
To what extent does inadequate market regulation contribute to poor health outcomes? A series of prominent scandals involving harmful medical devices has made improving the regulation of these devices an urgent problem for the European Union (EU). This is, however, a specific example of a general phenomenon. The EU remains first and foremost a large and integrated market within which the EU institutions have considerable regulatory authority. Even if there is little EU commitment to a health or social policy agenda, its use of that regulatory authority shapes health care cost and quality and should be understood as health policy. We use data from EU-level and national policy documents to analyse the EU's current regulatory framework for medical devices and assess its likely future efficacy. Despite revising the medical devices directive to require more stringent pre-authorization requirements for high-risk medical devices and improvements in post-market surveillance, the key underlying problems of market fragmentation and patient safety persist. Without strong and consistent support for the implementation of the new directive, the likely result is the status quo, with significant consequences for health in Europe.
市场监管不足在多大程度上导致了不良的健康结果?一系列涉及有害医疗器械的突出丑闻使得改善这些器械的监管成为了欧盟(EU)的当务之急。然而,这只是一个普遍现象的具体例子。欧盟首先而且最重要的是一个庞大而一体化的市场,欧盟机构在其中拥有相当大的监管权力。即使欧盟对卫生或社会政策议程的承诺很少,但其对该监管权力的使用也影响了医疗保健的成本和质量,因此应被视为卫生政策。我们使用来自欧盟层面和国家政策文件的数据来分析欧盟目前的医疗器械监管框架,并评估其未来可能的效果。尽管修订了医疗器械指令,要求对高风险医疗器械进行更严格的授权前要求,并改进上市后监测,但市场碎片化和患者安全的根本问题仍然存在。如果没有对新指令实施的强有力和一致的支持,可能的结果就是维持现状,这将对欧洲的健康产生重大影响。