• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于识别心力衰竭急诊患者发生严重不良事件风险较高的风险评分系统。

A risk scoring system to identify emergency department patients with heart failure at high risk for serious adverse events.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):17-26. doi: 10.1111/acem.12056.

DOI:10.1111/acem.12056
PMID:23570474
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There are no validated guidelines to guide physicians with difficult disposition decisions for emergency department (ED) patients with heart failure (HF). The authors sought to develop a risk scoring system to identify HF patients at high risk for serious adverse events (SAEs).

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study at six large Canadian EDS that enrolled adult patients who presented with acute decompensated HF. Each patient was assessed for standardized clinical and laboratory variables as well as for SAEs defined as death, intubation, admission to a monitored unit, or relapse requiring admission. Adjusted odds ratios for predictors of SAEs were calculated by stepwise logistic regression.

RESULTS

In 559 visits, 38.1% resulted in patient admission. Of 65 (11.6%) SAE cases, 31 (47.7%) occurred in patients not initially admitted. The multivariate model and resultant Ottawa Heart Failure Risk Scale consists of 10 elements, and the risk of SAEs varied from 2.8% to 89.0%, with good calibration between observed and expected probabilities. Internal validation showed the risk scores to be very accurate across 1,000 replications using the bootstrap method. A threshold of 1, 2, or 3 total scores for admission would be associated with sensitivities of 95.2, 80.6, or 64.5%, respectively, all better than current practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Many HF patients are discharged home from the ED and then suffer SAEs or death. The authors have developed an accurate risk scoring system that could ultimately be used to stratify the risk of poor outcomes and to enable rational and safe disposition decisions.

摘要

目的

目前尚无经过验证的指南来指导医生对急诊科(ED)心力衰竭(HF)患者进行困难处置决策。作者旨在开发一种风险评分系统,以识别 HF 患者发生严重不良事件(SAE)的高危人群。

方法

这是一项在加拿大 6 家大型急诊科进行的前瞻性队列研究,纳入了因急性失代偿性 HF 就诊的成年患者。每位患者均接受了标准化的临床和实验室变量评估,以及定义为死亡、插管、入住监护病房或需要再次入院的 SAE。通过逐步逻辑回归计算预测 SAE 的预测因素的调整比值比。

结果

在 559 次就诊中,38.1%的患者接受了入院治疗。在 65 例(11.6%)SAE 病例中,有 31 例(47.7%)最初未入院的患者发生了 SAE。多变量模型和由此产生的渥太华心力衰竭风险评分由 10 个要素组成,SAE 风险从 2.8%到 89.0%不等,观察到的和预期的概率之间具有良好的校准。内部验证表明,使用 bootstrap 方法在 1000 次重复中,风险评分非常准确。总分为 1、2 或 3 的入院阈值将分别与 95.2%、80.6%或 64.5%的敏感性相关,均优于目前的实践。

结论

许多 HF 患者从 ED 出院后会发生 SAE 或死亡。作者开发了一种准确的风险评分系统,最终可用于分层不良结局的风险,并实现合理和安全的处置决策。

相似文献

1
A risk scoring system to identify emergency department patients with heart failure at high risk for serious adverse events.一种用于识别心力衰竭急诊患者发生严重不良事件风险较高的风险评分系统。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):17-26. doi: 10.1111/acem.12056.
2
Clinical characteristics associated with adverse events in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective cohort study.与慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重患者不良事件相关的临床特征:一项前瞻性队列研究。
CMAJ. 2014 Apr 1;186(6):E193-204. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130968. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
3
The association between length of emergency department boarding and mortality.急诊科滞留时间与死亡率之间的关联。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(12):1324-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01236.x.
4
Postdischarge adverse events for 1-day hospital admissions in older adults admitted from the emergency department.老年急诊住院患者 1 天出院后的不良事件。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;56(3):253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.01.031. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
5
Early deaths in patients with heart failure discharged from the emergency department: a population-based analysis.从急诊科出院的心衰患者的早期死亡:一项基于人群的分析。
Circ Heart Fail. 2010 Mar;3(2):228-35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.109.885285. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
6
The elder patient with suspected acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department.急诊科疑似急性冠脉综合征的老年患者。
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Aug;14(8):732-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
7
Stress markers predict mortality in patients with nonspecific complaints presenting to the emergency department and may be a useful risk stratification tool to support disposition planning.应激标志物可预测因非特异性症状就诊于急诊科的患者的死亡率,并且可能是一种有用的风险分层工具,以支持处置计划。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;20(7):670-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12172.
8
Primary results of the Rapid Emergency Department Heart Failure Outpatient Trial (REDHOT). A multicenter study of B-type natriuretic peptide levels, emergency department decision making, and outcomes in patients presenting with shortness of breath.急诊科心力衰竭门诊快速试验(REDHOT)的主要结果。一项关于B型利钠肽水平、急诊科决策以及呼吸急促患者结局的多中心研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Sep 15;44(6):1328-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.015.
9
Favorable bed utilization and readmission rates for emergency department observation unit heart failure patients.心力衰竭患者在急诊观察单元的床位使用率和再入院率良好。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;20(6):554-61. doi: 10.1111/acem.12147.
10
Timing of immunoreactive B-type natriuretic peptide levels and treatment delay in acute decompensated heart failure: an ADHERE (Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry) analysis.急性失代偿性心力衰竭中免疫反应性B型利钠肽水平的时机与治疗延迟:一项ADHERE(急性失代偿性心力衰竭国家注册研究)分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Aug 12;52(7):534-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to use of the HEARTRISK6 Scale for acute heart failure presentations in the emergency department: a qualitative study.急诊科急性心力衰竭患者使用HEARTRISK6量表的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
CJEM. 2025 Aug 19. doi: 10.1007/s43678-025-00981-8.
2
Supervised machine learning including environmental factors to predict in-hospital outcomes in acute heart failure patients.包括环境因素的监督式机器学习,用于预测急性心力衰竭患者的院内结局。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024 Dec 16;6(2):190-199. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae094. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
The HEARTRISK6 Scale: Predicting Short-Term Serious Outcomes in Emergency Department Acute Heart Failure Patients.
心脏风险6评分量表:预测急诊科急性心力衰竭患者的短期严重结局
JACC Adv. 2024 May 24;3(7):100988. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100988. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Heart failure management at home: a non-randomised prospective case-controlled trial (HeMan at Home).心力衰竭的家庭管理:一项非随机前瞻性病例对照试验(HeMan 在家)。
Open Heart. 2023 Dec 7;10(2):e002371. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002371.
5
Physicians' Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED.医生对 ED 心力衰竭患者治疗的临床决策支持的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2344393. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44393.
6
Outcomes of acute heart failure patients managed in the emergency department.急诊科急性心力衰竭患者的治疗结果。
CJEM. 2023 Sep;25(9):752-760. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00555-6. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
7
Acute heart failure in the emergency department: short stay needs rewiring.急诊科的急性心力衰竭:短期住院需要重新规划。
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Jun;18(4):1133-1135. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03256-1. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
8
Candrive-Development of a Risk Stratification Tool for Older Drivers.Candrive-为老年驾驶员开发风险分层工具。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023 Dec 1;78(12):2348-2355. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glad044.
9
Emergency department risk assessment and disposition of acute heart failure patients: existing evidence and ongoing challenges.急诊科急性心力衰竭患者的风险评估和处置:现有证据和持续挑战。
Heart Fail Rev. 2023 Jul;28(4):781-793. doi: 10.1007/s10741-022-10272-4. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
10
Point-of-care echocardiography of the right heart improves acute heart failure risk stratification for low-risk patients: The REED-AHF prospective study.床旁超声心动图对右心的检查提高了低危急性心力衰竭患者的风险分层:REED-AHF 前瞻性研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Nov;29(11):1306-1319. doi: 10.1111/acem.14589. Epub 2022 Sep 26.