Suppr超能文献

腋窝温度与核心体温测量值之间的关系。

The relationship between axillary and core body temperature measurements.

作者信息

Giuffre M, Heidenreich T, Carney-Gersten P, Dorsch J A, Heidenreich E

出版信息

Appl Nurs Res. 1990 May;3(2):52-5. doi: 10.1016/s0897-1897(05)80158-2.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of the axillary site as an indicator of core body temperature. Data from 30 core body temperatures, 30 electronic axillary temperatures, and 30 mercury-in-glass axillary temperatures in nonpostoperative intensive care unit patients are reported. Core and axillary temperatures were simultaneously measured in each patient. The correlation between core and axillary-mercury was r = 0.90. The mean difference between core and axillary-mercury was 0.35 degrees F (0.19 degrees C). The correlation between core and axillary-electronic was r = .87. The mean difference between core and axillary-electronic was 0.6 degrees F (0.33 degrees C). Only three, or 5%, of the 60 core-axillary pairs met the expected 2 degrees F (1.2 degrees C) difference. These findings support the accuracy of axillary temperature measurement as a reflection of core body temperature measurement in nonpostoperative patients. These researchers suggest that mercury thermometers be used in cases where small differences in temperature are clinically meaningful.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估腋窝部位作为核心体温指标的准确性。报告了非术后重症监护病房患者的30次核心体温、30次电子腋窝温度和30次玻璃体温计腋窝温度的数据。对每位患者同时测量核心体温和腋窝温度。核心体温与玻璃体温计腋窝温度之间的相关性为r = 0.90。核心体温与玻璃体温计腋窝温度的平均差值为0.35华氏度(0.19摄氏度)。核心体温与电子腋窝温度之间的相关性为r = 0.87。核心体温与电子腋窝温度的平均差值为0.6华氏度(0.33摄氏度)。在60对核心体温与腋窝温度中,只有三对(即5%)符合预期的2华氏度(1.2摄氏度)差值。这些发现支持了在非术后患者中,腋窝温度测量作为核心体温测量反映指标的准确性。这些研究人员建议,在温度的微小差异具有临床意义的情况下,应使用水银体温计。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验