• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病自我管理教育:任重道远。

Diabetes self-management education: miles to go.

作者信息

Klein Helen Altman, Jackson Sarah M, Street Kenley, Whitacre James C, Klein Gary

机构信息

Division of Research, MacroCognition LLC, P.O. Box 533, Yellow Springs, OH 45387, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Res Pract. 2013;2013:581012. doi: 10.1155/2013/581012. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1155/2013/581012
PMID:23577243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3616351/
Abstract

This meta-analysis assessed how successfully Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) interventions help people with type 2 diabetes achieve and maintain healthy blood glucose levels. We included 52 DSME programs with 9,631 participants that reported post-intervention A1c levels in randomized controlled trials. The training conditions resulted in significant reductions in A1c levels compared to control conditions. However, the impact of intervention was modest shifting of only 7.23% more participants from diabetic to pre-diabetic or normal status, relative to the control condition. Most intervention participants did not achieve healthy A1c levels. Further, few DSME studies assessed long-term maintenance of A1c gains. Past trends suggest that gains are difficult to sustain over time. Our results suggested that interventions delivered by nurses were more successful than those delivered by non-nursing personnel. We suggest that DSME programs might do better by going beyond procedural interventions. Most DSME programs relied heavily on rules and procedures to guide decisions about diet, exercise, and weight loss. Future DSME may need to include cognitive self-monitoring, diagnosis, and planning skills to help patients detect anomalies, identify possible causes, generate corrective action, and avoid future barriers to maintaining healthy A1c levels. Finally, comprehensive descriptions of DSME programs would advance future efforts.

摘要

这项荟萃分析评估了糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)干预措施在帮助2型糖尿病患者实现并维持健康血糖水平方面的成效。我们纳入了52项DSME项目,共有9631名参与者,这些项目在随机对照试验中报告了干预后的糖化血红蛋白(A1c)水平。与对照条件相比,训练条件使A1c水平显著降低。然而,干预的影响较为有限,相对于对照条件,只有多7.23%的参与者从糖尿病状态转变为糖尿病前期或正常状态。大多数干预参与者并未达到健康的A1c水平。此外,很少有DSME研究评估A1c改善情况的长期维持效果。过去的趋势表明,随着时间推移,改善效果难以持续。我们的结果表明,由护士实施的干预比非护理人员实施的干预更成功。我们建议,DSME项目可能需要超越程序性干预才能取得更好的效果。大多数DSME项目严重依赖规则和程序来指导饮食、运动和减肥方面的决策。未来的DSME可能需要纳入认知自我监测、诊断和规划技能,以帮助患者发现异常、确定可能的原因、制定纠正措施,并避免未来维持健康A1c水平的障碍。最后,对DSME项目进行全面描述将推动未来的研究工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d530/3616351/dd898f23e924/NRP2013-581012.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d530/3616351/1b2d99d7ae16/NRP2013-581012.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d530/3616351/dd898f23e924/NRP2013-581012.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d530/3616351/1b2d99d7ae16/NRP2013-581012.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d530/3616351/dd898f23e924/NRP2013-581012.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Diabetes self-management education: miles to go.糖尿病自我管理教育:任重道远。
Nurs Res Pract. 2013;2013:581012. doi: 10.1155/2013/581012. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
2
Enhancing Access to Diabetes Self-management Education in Primary Care.加强初级保健中糖尿病自我管理教育的可及性。
Diabetes Educ. 2016 Oct;42(5):635-45. doi: 10.1177/0145721716659147. Epub 2016 Jul 31.
3
Impact of Diabetes Self-Management Education on A1C Levels Among Black/African Americans: A Systematic Review.糖尿病自我管理教育对非裔美国人 A1C 水平的影响:系统评价。
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2024 Feb;50(1):87-95. doi: 10.1177/26350106231213400. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
4
Who can provide diabetes self-management support in primary care? Findings from a randomized controlled trial.谁可以在初级保健中提供糖尿病自我管理支持?一项随机对照试验的结果。
Diabetes Educ. 2013 Sep-Oct;39(5):705-13. doi: 10.1177/0145721713492570. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
5
Does diabetes self-management education in conjunction with primary care improve glycemic control in Hispanic patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病自我管理教育与初级保健相结合能否改善西班牙裔患者的血糖控制?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Educ. 2015 Aug;41(4):472-84. doi: 10.1177/0145721715584404. Epub 2015 May 4.
6
Sustaining short-term improvements over the long-term: results from a 2-year diabetes self-management support (DSMS) intervention.长期维持短期改善:一项为期 2 年的糖尿病自我管理支持(DSMS)干预的结果。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Jan;95(1):85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
7
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
8
Integration and Utilization of Peer Leaders for Diabetes Self-Management Support: Results From Project SEED (Support, Education, and Evaluation in Diabetes).同伴领导在糖尿病自我管理支持中的整合与利用:SEED 项目(糖尿病支持、教育和评估)的结果。
Diabetes Educ. 2018 Aug;44(4):373-382. doi: 10.1177/0145721718777855. Epub 2018 May 28.
9
Effect of diabetes self-management education on glycemic control in Latino adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病自我管理教育对 2 型糖尿病拉丁裔成年人血糖控制的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Feb;103(2):266-275. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
10
Perspectives of deprived patients on diabetes self-management programmes delivered by the local primary care team: a qualitative study on facilitators and barriers for participation, in France.被剥夺医疗服务患者对基层医疗团队提供的糖尿病自我管理项目的看法:法国一项关于参与的促进因素和障碍的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 11;20(1):855. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05715-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurse-led follow-up care versus routine health education and follow-up in diabetes patients: An effectiveness analysis.护士主导的随访护理与糖尿病患者常规健康教育和随访的效果分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 31;103(22):e38094. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038094.
2
The Influence of Nurse-Led Interventions on Diseases Management in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review.护士主导的干预措施对糖尿病患者疾病管理的影响:一项叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 30;12(3):352. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12030352.
3
Role of Caregivers in Remote Management of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review of Literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Blood glucose meters.血糖仪
Diabetes Forecast. 2011 Jan;64(1):30-2, 35-43.
2
2009 resource guide. New products. This year, the name of the game is convenience.2009年资源指南。新产品。今年,关键在于便利。
Diabetes Forecast. 2009 Jan;62(1):33-5.
3
Randomised controlled trial of intensive multifactorial treatment for cardiovascular risk in patients with screen-detected type 2 diabetes: 1-year data from the ADDITION Netherlands study.筛查发现的2型糖尿病患者心血管风险强化多因素治疗的随机对照试验:荷兰ADDITION研究的1年数据
照顾者在 2 型糖尿病患者远程管理中的作用:文献系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 11;25:e46988. doi: 10.2196/46988.
4
The Effects of Diabetes Self-Management Education on Quality of Life for Persons With Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.1 型糖尿病患者糖尿病自我管理教育对生活质量影响的系统评价:随机对照试验的系统评价。
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2022 Apr;48(2):111-135. doi: 10.1177/26350106211070266. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
5
Delivering the Same Intervention to Hispanic/Latinos With Pre-diabetes and Diabetes. Early Evidence of Success in a Longitudinal Mixed Method Study.对患有前驱糖尿病和糖尿病的西班牙裔/拉丁裔人群实施相同的干预措施。一项纵向混合方法研究的早期成功证据。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211055595. doi: 10.1177/00469580211055595.
6
Development and evaluation of self-care intervention to improve self-care practices among people living with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a mixed-methods study protocol.中文译文: 改善 2 型糖尿病患者自我护理实践的自我护理干预措施的制定与评价:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 1;11(7):e046825. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046825.
7
Effects of therapeutic education on self-efficacy, self-care activities and glycemic control of type 2 diabetic patients in a primary healthcare center in Lebanon.黎巴嫩一家初级医疗保健中心中治疗性教育对2型糖尿病患者自我效能、自我护理活动及血糖控制的影响
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020 Jun 12;19(2):813-821. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00567-4. eCollection 2020 Dec.
8
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support: Referral and Attendance at a Patient-Centered Medical Home.糖尿病自我管理教育与支持:转诊至以患者为中心的医疗之家并出席
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720967232. doi: 10.1177/2150132720967232.
9
Improved diabetes control among low-income Mexican Americans through community-clinical interventions: results of an RCT.通过社区-临床干预改善低收入墨西哥裔美国人的糖尿病控制:一项随机对照试验的结果
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 May;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000867.
10
Predicting Healthy Lifestyle Behaviours Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Rural Bali, Indonesia.预测印度尼西亚巴厘岛农村地区2型糖尿病患者的健康生活方式行为
Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2020 Apr 20;13:1179551420915856. doi: 10.1177/1179551420915856. eCollection 2020.
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Jan;59(558):43-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X394851.
4
Reporting standards for research in psychology: why do we need them? What might they be?心理学研究报告标准:我们为何需要它们?它们可能是什么样的?
Am Psychol. 2008 Dec;63(9):839-51. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.839.
5
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.开发与评估复杂干预措施:医学研究理事会新指南
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
6
An integrated intervention program to control diabetes in overweight Chinese women and men with type 2 diabetes.一项针对中国超重2型糖尿病女性和男性的综合糖尿病控制干预项目。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17(3):514-24.
7
Use of a real time continuous glucose monitoring system as a motivational device for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.使用实时连续血糖监测系统作为控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的激励手段。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;82(1):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.06.015. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
8
A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions.干预措施中使用的行为改变技术分类法。
Health Psychol. 2008 May;27(3):379-87. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379.
9
The Informatics for Diabetes and Education Telemedicine (IDEATel) project.糖尿病与教育远程医疗信息学(IDEATel)项目。
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2007;118:289-304.
10
Technological intervention for obese patients with type 2 diabetes.针对2型糖尿病肥胖患者的技术干预。
Appl Nurs Res. 2008 May;21(2):84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2007.01.007.