Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisc.
Department of Medicine, Geriatrics Division, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisc; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), William S Middleton Hospital, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Madison, Wisc.
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jun;59(6):1502-10, 1510.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.12.015. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
Reducing readmissions represents a unique opportunity to improve care and reduce health care costs and is the focus of major payers. A large number of surgical patients are readmitted to hospitals other than where the primary surgery was performed, resulting in clinical decisions that do not incorporate the primary surgeon and potentially alter outcomes. This study characterizes readmission to primary vs different hospitals after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and examines the implications with regard to mortality and cost.
Patients who underwent open or endovascular aneurysm repair for AAA were identified from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Chronic Conditions Warehouse, a random 5% national sample of Medicare beneficiaries from 2005 to 2009. Outcomes for patients who underwent AAA repair and were readmitted within 30 days of initial discharge were compared based on readmission location (primary vs different hospital).
A total of 885 patients underwent AAA repair and were readmitted within 30 days. Of these, 626 (70.7%) returned to the primary facility, and 259 (29.3%) returned to a different facility. Greater distance from patient residence to the primary hospital was the strongest predictor of readmission to a different facility. Patients living 50 to 100 miles from the primary hospital were more likely to be readmitted to a different hospital compared with patients living <10 miles away (odds ratio, 8.50; P < .001). Patients with diagnoses directly related to the surgery (eg, wound infection) were more likely to be readmitted to the primary hospital, whereas medical diagnoses (eg, pneumonia and congestive heart failure) were more likely to be treated at a different hospital. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between patients readmitted to a different or the primary hospital. Median total 30-day payments were significantly lower at different vs primary hospitals (primary, $11,978 vs different, $11,168; P = .04).
Readmission to a different facility after AAA repair is common and occurs more frequently than for the overall Medicare population. Patients travelling a greater distance for AAA repair are more likely to return to different vs the primary hospital when further care is required. For AAA repair, quality healthcare may be achieved at marginally lower cost and with greater patient convenience for selected readmissions at hospitals other than where the initial procedure was performed.
降低再入院率代表了改善医疗服务和降低医疗成本的独特机会,也是主要支付方关注的焦点。大量接受过外科手术的患者会被转往与初次手术医院不同的其他医院进行治疗,这会导致临床决策无法参考主刀医生,从而潜在地改变治疗结果。本研究分析了腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复术后患者在初次手术医院和其他医院的再入院情况,并探讨了再入院对死亡率和费用的影响。
从 2005 年至 2009 年医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心慢性病仓库中选取接受开放或血管内动脉瘤修复术治疗 AAA 的患者作为研究对象,该数据库为医疗保险受益人的全国随机 5%抽样。对比分析初次出院后 30 天内再入院患者的再入院地点(初次手术医院和其他医院)与结局的相关性。
共 885 例患者接受 AAA 修复术并在 30 天内再入院。其中,626 例(70.7%)返回初次手术医院,259 例(29.3%)返回其他医院。距离患者居住地到初次手术医院的距离越远,越有可能转往其他医院。与居住距离<10 英里的患者相比,居住距离 50 至 100 英里的患者更有可能被转往其他医院(比值比,8.50;P<.001)。与手术直接相关的诊断(如伤口感染)的患者更有可能被转往初次手术医院,而与手术无关的诊断(如肺炎和充血性心力衰竭)更有可能在其他医院接受治疗。转往其他医院或初次手术医院的患者死亡率无统计学差异。在初次手术医院和其他医院,30 天内总支付中位数分别为 11978 美元和 11168 美元,初次手术医院显著高于其他医院(P=0.04)。
AAA 修复术后转往其他医院的情况较为常见,且比一般 Medicare 人群更为常见。AAA 修复术的患者在需要进一步治疗时,距离初次手术医院较远的患者更有可能转往其他医院而非初次手术医院。对于 AAA 修复术,对于特定的再入院患者而言,在其他医院接受治疗可能以略微降低的成本和更高的患者便利性实现高质量的医疗服务。