1 Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School and Hospital, University Medical Center Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany .
Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2013 Nov;19(11):850-63. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2012.0695. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
Though recent studies report decisive positive effects on cells, elicited by ultraviolet (UV)-induced bioactivation of biomaterial implant surfaces, they frequently employ cells other than of human origin or cells not representing oral implant targets. Therefore, the present study aims at exploring distinct cell functions of primary human alveolar bone osteoblasts (PHABO) in response to bioactivated microstructured titanium and zirconia implant surfaces with matched controls. UV-treatment significantly reduced surface carbon, while concomitantly increasing wettability. In case of titanium or zirconia biomaterial source of equal roughness, bioactivation did not significantly improve cell functions, including initial cell attachment, morphogenesis, proliferation, and gene expression of osteogenic biomarkers osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase and collagen type I. However, cell functions discriminated surface roughness by either comparing titanium and zirconia or interindividual zirconia surfaces. While rough surfaces primarily favored primary adhesion, proliferation appeared improved on smooth surfaces, and gene expression seemed to be stronger modulated on the smoothest biomaterial. Our results show for the first time that bioactivation appears to be not the main causative for the observed modulation of the distinct cell functions analyzed in PHABO, but add to the body of evidence that they were more governed by surface architecture rather than by bioactivation.
尽管最近的研究报告称,紫外线(UV)诱导生物活化对生物材料植入表面的细胞有决定性的积极影响,但它们经常使用非人类来源的细胞或不代表口腔植入物靶标的细胞。因此,本研究旨在探索原代人牙槽骨成骨细胞(PHABO)对经过生物活化的微结构钛和氧化锆植入表面的不同细胞功能,同时设有匹配的对照。UV 处理显著降低了表面的碳含量,同时提高了润湿性。对于具有相同粗糙度的钛或氧化锆生物材料来源,生物活化并没有显著改善细胞功能,包括初始细胞附着、形态发生、增殖和骨生成生物标志物骨钙素、碱性磷酸酶和 I 型胶原的基因表达。然而,细胞功能通过比较钛和氧化锆或个体之间的氧化锆表面来区分表面粗糙度。虽然粗糙表面主要有利于初始粘附,但在光滑表面上增殖似乎有所改善,而在最光滑的生物材料上基因表达似乎更强。我们的研究结果首次表明,生物活化似乎不是观察到的 PHABO 中分析的不同细胞功能的主要调节因素,而是进一步证明它们更多地受表面结构而不是生物活化的控制。