• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较使用 DSM-5 中的适应不良特征对人格障碍类型进行评分的方法。

Comparing methods for scoring personality disorder types using maladaptive traits in DSM-5.

机构信息

Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):353-61. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486182. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1177/1073191113486182
PMID:23588686
Abstract

The DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.) Section III will include an alternative hybrid system for the diagnosis of personality disorder (PD). This alternative system defines PD types partly through specific combinations of maladaptive traits, rather than by using a set of polythetic diagnostic criteria. The current report utilizes a large sample of undergraduates (n = 1,159) to examine three dimensional methods for comparing an individual's trait profile to each PD type. We found that the sum of an individual's scores on the assigned traits obtained large convergent correlations (Mdn r =.61) and best reproduced the patterns of PD discriminant correlations observed within the DSM-IV measure. We also tested the DSM-5 Section III model algorithms and compared them with different thresholds for assigning categorical diagnoses. Frequency rates using the algorithms were greatly reduced, whereas requiring half of the assigned traits produced rates that more closely approximated current prevalence estimates. Our research suggests that DSM-5 Section III trait model can reproduce the DSM-IV-TR PD constructs and identifies effective methods of doing so.

摘要

《精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第五版)》(DSM-5)第三部分将包括一种人格障碍(PD)诊断的替代混合系统。该替代系统通过特定的适应不良特征组合来部分定义 PD 类型,而不是使用一组多元诊断标准。本报告利用一个大型本科生样本(n=1159),检验了将个体特质与每种 PD 类型进行比较的三维方法。我们发现,个体在指定特征上的得分总和获得了较大的收敛相关(中位数 r =.61),并且最能再现 DSM-IV 测量中观察到的 PD 判别相关模式。我们还测试了 DSM-5 第三部分的模型算法,并将其与分配分类诊断的不同阈值进行了比较。使用算法的频率大大降低,而要求一半的指定特征产生的频率更接近当前的流行率估计。我们的研究表明,DSM-5 第三部分特质模型可以再现 DSM-IV-TR PD 结构,并确定了有效的再现方法。

相似文献

1
Comparing methods for scoring personality disorder types using maladaptive traits in DSM-5.比较使用 DSM-5 中的适应不良特征对人格障碍类型进行评分的方法。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):353-61. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486182. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
2
Convergence between DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 diagnostic models for personality disorder: evaluation of strategies for establishing diagnostic thresholds.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)人格障碍诊断模型之间的趋同:建立诊断阈值策略的评估
J Psychiatr Pract. 2013 May;19(3):179-93. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000430502.78833.06.
3
DSM-5 pathological personality traits and the personality assessment inventory.DSM-5 病理性人格特质与人格评估量表。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):269-85. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486286. Epub 2013 Apr 21.
4
On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets: implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits.PSY-5 领域与 PID-5 领域和方面的趋同:对 DSM-5 人格特质评估的影响。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):286-94. doi: 10.1177/1073191112471141. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
5
The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains.DSM-5 人格特质方面的聚合结构与五因素模型特质领域。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):308-11. doi: 10.1177/1073191112457589. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
6
Conceptions of narcissism and the DSM-5 pathological personality traits.自恋观念与 DSM-5 病理性人格特质。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):339-52. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486692. Epub 2013 Apr 21.
7
Relating DSM-5 section III personality traits to section II personality disorder diagnoses.将《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版第三部分的人格特质与第二部分的人格障碍诊断相关联。
Psychol Med. 2016 Feb;46(3):647-55. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002226. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
8
The psychometric properties of the personality inventory for DSM-5 in an APA DSM-5 field trial sample.DSM-5 人格量表在 APA DSM-5 现场试验样本中的心理计量特性。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):362-9. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486183. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
9
General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample.DSM-5 五因素框架中大学生样本的一般和适应不良特征。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):295-307. doi: 10.1177/1073191113475808. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
10
DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中替代人格障碍模型特质作为五因素模型的适应不良极端变体:一项项目反应理论分析
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 May;124(2):343-54. doi: 10.1037/abn0000035. Epub 2015 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 trait correlates with self-reported acts of rape.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格量表特质与自我报告的强奸行为相关。
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2024 Jun 18;13(1):18-25. doi: 10.5114/cipp/185625. eCollection 2025.
2
A prospective study of the impact of an emotional intelligence program on opioid relapse and its determinants in upper Egypt.一项关于情商项目对埃及上埃及地区阿片类药物复发及其决定因素影响的前瞻性研究。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 10;13(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02638-8.
3
Transauricular vagus nerve stimulation in preventing post-traumatic stress disorder in emergency trauma surgery patients in China: a study protocol for a multicenter, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.
经耳迷走神经刺激预防中国急诊创伤手术患者创伤后应激障碍:一项多中心、双盲、随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e093467. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093467.
4
Transgender and Gender Diverse Patients Are Diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder More Frequently Than Cisgender Patients Regardless of Personality Pathology.无论人格病理学情况如何,跨性别和性别多样化患者被诊断为边缘性人格障碍的频率都高于顺性别患者。
Transgend Health. 2024 Dec 16;9(6):554-565. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2023.0062. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Discriminative capacity of the Spanish version of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms-II (IDAS-II) for detecting DMS-5 specific disorders and poor quality of life in a clinical sample.西班牙语版抑郁和焦虑症状量表-II(IDAS-II)鉴别诊断 DMS-5 特定障碍及临床样本中生活质量较差的能力。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jul 18;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02270-x.
6
The Portuguese version of the self-report form of the DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS-SR) in a community and clinical sample.《DSM-5 人格功能水平评定量表(LPFS-SR)自陈式量表的葡萄牙语版:社区和临床样本》。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0300706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300706. eCollection 2024.
7
Bridging the ICD11 and the DSM-5 personality disorders classification systems: The role of the PID5BF + M.弥合国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)与精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)人格障碍分类系统之间的差距:人格障碍特质评定量表第5版简版(PID5BF + M)的作用
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 2;14:1004895. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1004895. eCollection 2023.
8
Normative data for PID-5 domains, facets, and personality disorder composites from a representative sample and comparison to community and clinical samples.代表性样本中 PID-5 领域、方面和人格障碍综合指标的常模数据,并与社区和临床样本进行比较。
Personal Disord. 2022 Sep;13(5):536-541. doi: 10.1037/per0000548. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
9
Resilient, undercontrolled, and overcontrolled personality types based upon DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits.基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版适应不良人格特质的坚韧型、控制不足型和控制过度型人格类型。
Heliyon. 2021 May 4;7(5):e06938. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06938. eCollection 2021 May.
10
The Utility of ICD-11 and DSM-5 Traits for Differentiating Patients With Personality Disorders From Other Clinical Groups.国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)人格特质在区分人格障碍患者与其他临床群体中的效用
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 16;12:633882. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.633882. eCollection 2021.