The Nursing & Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, East Nosrat St., Tohid Square, 6459, Tehran, Iran.
Burns. 2013 Sep;39(6):1297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Apr 13.
Burn as a traumatic life incident manifests severe pain and psychological problems. Specific instruments are needed to evaluate burn patients' psychological issues related to the injury. The aim of this study was to translate and evaluate the reliability and validity of the Persian versions of Impact of Burn Specific Pain Anxiety scale (BSPAS) and Impact of Event Scale (IES).
In this cross-sectional study, convenience sampling method was utilized to select 55 Iranian hospitalized burn patients. Combined translation was utilized for translating scales. Alpha cronbach, item-total correlation, convergent and discriminative validity were evaluated.
The Cronbach's α for both BSPAS- and IES-Persian version was 0.96. Item-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.70 to 0.90. Convergent construct validity was confirmed by indicating high correlation between the scales designed to measure the same concepts. The mean score of BSPAS- and IES-Persian version was lower for individuals with a lower TBSA burn percentage which assessed discriminative construct validity of scales.
BSPAS- and IES-Persian version showed high internal consistency and good validity for the assessment of burn psychological outcome in hospitalized burn patients. Future studies are needed to determine repeatability, factor structure, sensitivity and specificity of the scales.
烧伤作为一种创伤性生活事件,表现为严重的疼痛和心理问题。需要特定的工具来评估烧伤患者与损伤相关的心理问题。本研究的目的是翻译和评估烧伤特异性疼痛焦虑量表(BSPAS)和事件影响量表(IES)的波斯语版本的信度和效度。
在这项横断面研究中,采用便利抽样法选择了 55 名伊朗住院烧伤患者。采用综合翻译法对量表进行翻译。评估了 alpha 克朗巴赫、项目总分相关性、收敛和判别有效性。
BSPAS 和 IES 波斯语版本的克朗巴赫α系数均为 0.96。项目总分相关系数范围为 0.70 至 0.90。通过表明用于测量相同概念的量表之间存在高度相关性,证实了收敛结构有效性。烧伤面积百分比较低的个体 BSPAS 和 IES 波斯语版本的平均得分较低,评估了量表的判别结构有效性。
BSPAS 和 IES 波斯语版本在评估住院烧伤患者的烧伤心理结局方面具有较高的内部一致性和良好的有效性。需要进一步研究确定这些量表的可重复性、因子结构、敏感性和特异性。