Suppr超能文献

有症状但未破裂的腹主动脉瘤的临床管理

Clinical management of the symptomatic but unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

作者信息

Sullivan C A, Rohrer M J, Cutler B S

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester 01655.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 1990 Jun;11(6):799-803.

PMID:2359191
Abstract

Pain or tenderness of an abdominal aortic aneurysm is widely believed to signify acute expansion and imminent rupture. To assess the potential benefit of emergency operation for the group of patients with an acutely expanding aneurysm, the clinical course of 19 patients with a symptomatic but unruptured expanding abdominal aortic aneurysm was compared with 117 patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm resection, and 69 patients having operation for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Postoperative morbidity was high in the patients with an expanding abdominal aortic aneurysm, and included a 21% incidence of myocardial infarction, a 10% incidence of stroke, a 37% risk of ventilatory failure, and a 31% incidence of acute renal failure, which was not statistically different from the results in patients having ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm resection. Patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm resection had only an 8% risk of myocardial infarction, and only a 2% risk of stroke, ventilatory failure, or renal failure. The mortality rate for expanding abdominal aortic aneurysm resection was 26% compared to 35% for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (p = 0.31). Both emergency operations had a mortality rate more than five times greater than the 5.1% after elective procedures (p = 0.008). Our findings emphasize the need for early and aggressive treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the elective setting, even in the patient at high risk, and suggest that the preoperative assessment and modification of risk factors is important to prevent the cardiac, cerebrovascular, pulmonary, and renal complications seen accompanying an emergency operation of this magnitude.

摘要

腹主动脉瘤的疼痛或压痛被广泛认为意味着急性扩张和即将破裂。为了评估对急性扩张性动脉瘤患者进行急诊手术的潜在益处,将19例有症状但未破裂的扩张性腹主动脉瘤患者的临床病程与117例接受择期腹主动脉瘤切除术的患者以及69例因腹主动脉瘤破裂而接受手术的患者进行了比较。扩张性腹主动脉瘤患者术后发病率较高,包括21%的心肌梗死发生率、10%的中风发生率、37%的呼吸衰竭风险以及31%的急性肾衰竭发生率,这与腹主动脉瘤破裂切除术患者的结果在统计学上无差异。接受择期腹主动脉瘤切除术的患者心肌梗死风险仅为8%,中风、呼吸衰竭或肾衰竭风险仅为2%。扩张性腹主动脉瘤切除术的死亡率为26%,而腹主动脉瘤破裂切除术的死亡率为35%(p = 0.31)。这两种急诊手术的死亡率均比择期手术后的5.1%高出五倍多(p = 0.008)。我们的研究结果强调,即使是高危患者,也需要在择期情况下对腹主动脉瘤进行早期积极治疗,并表明术前评估和危险因素的调整对于预防这种大型急诊手术中出现的心脏、脑血管、肺部和肾脏并发症很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验