Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 2013 May;44(5):477-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.02.003.
It is often assumed that children avoid fruit in school cafeterias because of higher relative prices and preferences for other foods. Interviews with children reveal that eating whole fresh fruit can be difficult for those with small mouths or braces. Older girls find whole fruits messy and unattractive to eat.
To determine the effect of offering pre-sliced fruit in schools on selection and intake.
Three of six schools were assigned randomly to serve apples in slices. Three control schools served apples whole. Selection, consumption, and waste of apples were measured prior to and during treatment.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Cafeterias in six public middle schools in Wayne County NY in 2011. Participants included all students who purchased lunch on days when data were collected.
Treatment schools were provided with a standard commercial fruit slicer, and cafeteria staff members were instructed to use it when students requested apples. Trained researchers recorded how much of each apple was consumed and how much was wasted in both control and treatment schools.
Daily apple sales, percentage of an apple serving consumed per student, and percentage of an apple serving wasted per student.
Data were analyzed in 2012. Schools that used fruit slicers to pre-slice fruit increased average daily apple sales by 71% compared to control schools (p<0.01). The percentage of students who selected apples and ate more than half increased by 73% (p=0.02) at schools that served pre-sliced fruit, and the percentage that wasted half or more decreased by 48% (p=0.03).
Sliced fruit is more appealing to children than whole fruit because it is easier and tidier to eat. This study applies the principle of convenience from behavioral economics and provides an example of a scalable, low-cost environmental change that promotes healthy eating and decreases waste.
人们通常认为,由于相对较高的价格和对其他食物的偏好,孩子们在学校自助餐厅会选择不吃水果。通过对孩子们的访谈发现,对于那些嘴巴较小或戴牙套的孩子来说,吃整个新鲜水果可能会有些困难。年龄较大的女孩觉得整个水果吃起来很麻烦,也不美观。
确定在学校提供切片水果对选择和摄入的影响。
随机将其中三所学校分配到切好的苹果供应组,三所对照组则供应完整的苹果。在治疗开始前和进行期间,测量了学生对苹果的选择、食用和浪费情况。
地点/参与者:2011 年,纽约州韦恩县六所公立中学的自助餐厅。参与者包括所有在数据收集日购买午餐的学生。
为治疗组学校提供了标准的商用水果切片机,并指示食堂工作人员在学生要求苹果时使用切片机。经过培训的研究人员记录了对照组和治疗组中每个苹果的消耗量和浪费量。
每天的苹果销售量、每位学生消耗的苹果份额百分比和每位学生浪费的苹果份额百分比。
2012 年进行数据分析。与对照组学校相比,使用水果切片机对水果进行预切片的学校平均每天的苹果销售量增加了 71%(p<0.01)。选择苹果并食用超过一半的学生比例增加了 73%(p=0.02),而选择并浪费一半或更多苹果的学生比例减少了 48%(p=0.03)。
切片水果比整个水果更受孩子们的欢迎,因为它更容易食用且更整洁。本研究应用了行为经济学中的便利性原则,并提供了一个可扩展的、低成本的环境变化的范例,以促进健康饮食和减少浪费。