Roenneberg Till, Kantermann Thomas, Juda Myriam, Vetter Céline, Allebrandt Karla V
Institute for Medical Psychology, Centre for Chronobiology, Medical Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Goethestrasse 31, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2013(217):311-31. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-25950-0_13.
The circadian clock can only reliably fulfil its function if it is stably entrained. Most clocks use the light-dark cycle as environmental signal (zeitgeber) for this active synchronisation. How we think about clock function and entrainment has been strongly influenced by the early concepts of the field's pioneers, and the astonishing finding that circadian rhythms continue a self-sustained oscillation in constant conditions has become central to our understanding of entrainment.Here, we argue that we have to rethink these initial circadian dogmas to fully understand the circadian programme and how it entrains. Light is also the prominent zeitgeber for the human clock, as has been shown experimentally in the laboratory and in large-scale epidemiological studies in real life, and we hypothesise that social zeitgebers act through light entrainment via behavioural feedback loops (zeitnehmer). We show that human entrainment can be investigated in detail outside of the laboratory, by using the many 'experimental' conditions provided by the real world, such as daylight savings time, the 'forced synchrony' imposed by the introduction of time zones, or the fact that humans increasingly create their own light environment. The conditions of human entrainment have changed drastically over the past 100 years and have led to an increasing discrepancy between biological and social time (social jetlag). The increasing evidence that social jetlag has detrimental consequences for health suggests that shift-work is only an extreme form of circadian misalignment, and that the majority of the population in the industrialised world suffers from a similarly 'forced synchrony'.
只有当昼夜节律时钟被稳定校准后,它才能可靠地发挥其功能。大多数时钟将明暗周期作为这种主动同步的环境信号(授时因子)。该领域先驱者的早期概念对我们如何看待时钟功能和校准产生了重大影响,并且昼夜节律在恒定条件下持续进行自我维持振荡这一惊人发现已成为我们理解校准的核心。在此,我们认为我们必须重新思考这些最初的昼夜节律教条,以便全面理解昼夜节律程序及其校准方式。光也是人类时钟的主要授时因子,这已在实验室实验以及现实生活中的大规模流行病学研究中得到证实,并且我们假设社会授时因子通过行为反馈回路(授时受器)经由光校准起作用。我们表明,通过利用现实世界提供的许多“实验性”条件,例如夏令时、时区引入所带来的“强制同步”,或者人类越来越多地创造自己的光环境,在实验室之外也可以详细研究人类的校准情况。在过去100年里,人类校准的条件发生了巨大变化,导致生物时间与社会时间之间的差异日益增大(社会时差)。越来越多的证据表明社会时差对健康有不利影响,这表明轮班工作只是昼夜节律失调的一种极端形式,并且工业化世界中的大多数人口都遭受着类似的“强制同步”。