Hattan Mohammad Ali, Pani Sharat Chandra, Alomari Mohammad
Division of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy, P.O. Box 84891, Riyadh 11681, Saudi Arabia.
Int J Dent. 2013;2013:607405. doi: 10.1155/2013/607405. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
Aim. The aim of this study is to evaluate the shear bond strength of nanocomposite to stainless steel crowns using a new universal bonding system. Material and Methods. Eighty (80) stainless steel crowns (SSCs) were divided into four groups (20 each). Packable nanocomposite was bonded to the lingual surface of the crowns in the following methods: Group A without adhesive (control group), Group B using a new universal adhesive system (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany), and Group C and Group D using two different brands of single-bottle adhesive systems. Shear bond strengths were calculated and the types of failure also were recorded. Results. The shear strength of Group B was significantly greater than that of other groups. No significant differences were found between the shear bond strengths of Groups C and D. The control group had significantly lower shear bond strength (P < 0.05) to composite than the groups that utilized bonding agents. Conclusion. Composites bonding to stainless steel crowns using the new universal bonding agent (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) show significantly greater shear bond strengths and fewer adhesive failures when compared to traditional single-bottle systems.
目的。本研究的目的是使用一种新型通用粘结系统评估纳米复合材料与不锈钢冠的剪切粘结强度。材料与方法。八十(80)个不锈钢冠(SSCs)被分为四组(每组20个)。可填充纳米复合材料通过以下方法粘结到冠的舌面:A组不使用粘结剂(对照组),B组使用新型通用粘结系统(Scotchbond通用粘结剂,3M ESPE,德国塞费尔德),C组和D组使用两种不同品牌的单瓶装粘结系统。计算剪切粘结强度并记录失效类型。结果。B组的剪切强度显著高于其他组。C组和D组的剪切粘结强度之间未发现显著差异。对照组与使用粘结剂的组相比,复合材料的剪切粘结强度显著更低(P < 0.05)。结论。与传统单瓶装系统相比,使用新型通用粘结剂(Scotchbond通用粘结剂,3M ESPE,德国塞费尔德)将复合材料粘结到不锈钢冠上时,显示出显著更高的剪切粘结强度和更少的粘结失效。