• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

构建一个评估医疗机构中多样性意识和接受度的问卷。

Constructing a questionnaire for assessment of awareness and acceptance of diversity in healthcare institutions.

机构信息

Karolinska Institutet, Neurobiology, Care Science and Society, Aging Research Centre, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 22;13:145. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-145.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-13-145
PMID:23607334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3644252/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To develop a healthcare environment that is congruent with diversity among care providers and care recipients and to eliminate ethnic discrimination, it's important to map out and assess caregivers' awareness and acceptance of diversity. Because of a lack of standardized questionnaires in the Swedish context, this study designed and standardized a questionnaire: the Assessment of Awareness and Acceptance of Diversity in Healthcare Institutions (AAAD, for short).

METHOD

The questionnaire was developed in four phases: a comprehensive literature review, face and content validity, construct validity by factor analysis, and a reliability test by internal consistency and stability assessments.

RESULTS

Results of different validity and reliability analyses suggest high face, content, and construct validity as well as good reliability in internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.68 to 0.8) and stability (test-retest: Spearman rank correlation coefficient: 0.60 to 0.76). The result of the factor analysis identified six dimensions in the questionnaire: 1) Attitude toward discrimination, 2) Interaction between staff, 3) Stereotypic attitude toward working with a person with a Swedish background, 4) Attitude toward working with a patient with a different background, 5) Attitude toward communication with persons with different backgrounds, 6) Attitude toward interaction between patients and staff.

CONCLUSION

This study introduces a newly developed questionnaire with good reliability and validity values that can assess healthcare workers' awareness and acceptance of diversity in the healthcare environment and healthcare delivery.

摘要

背景

为了营造与医护人员和患者多样性相契合的医疗环境,消除种族歧视,重要的是要了解并评估医护人员对多样性的认知和接受程度。由于在瑞典语境下缺乏标准化问卷,本研究设计并标准化了一份问卷:医疗机构多样性认知和接受度评估问卷(AAAD)。

方法

问卷的开发共分为四个阶段:全面的文献回顾、表面效度和内容效度、通过因子分析进行结构有效性检验,以及通过内部一致性和稳定性评估进行可靠性检验。

结果

不同有效性和可靠性分析的结果表明,该问卷具有较高的表面效度、内容效度和结构效度,且内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha:0.68 至 0.8)和稳定性(重测检验:Spearman 等级相关系数:0.60 至 0.76)良好。因子分析的结果确定了问卷的六个维度:1)对歧视的态度,2)员工之间的互动,3)对与瑞典背景的人共事的刻板态度,4)对与不同背景的患者共事的态度,5)对与不同背景的人进行沟通的态度,6)对患者与员工之间互动的态度。

结论

本研究引入了一种新开发的问卷,该问卷具有良好的信度和效度,可以评估医护人员对医疗环境和医疗服务中多样性的认知和接受程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/207f/3644252/ef1fcbb04331/1472-6963-13-145-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/207f/3644252/ef1fcbb04331/1472-6963-13-145-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/207f/3644252/ef1fcbb04331/1472-6963-13-145-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Constructing a questionnaire for assessment of awareness and acceptance of diversity in healthcare institutions.构建一个评估医疗机构中多样性意识和接受度的问卷。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 22;13:145. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-145.
2
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
3
Development, validation and reliability of a questionnaire for assessment of physician's knowledge, attitude and practices (KAPs) regarding foodborne diseases in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.开发、验证并确立评估沙特阿拉伯王国医生对食源性疾病的知识、态度和实践(KAPs)的问卷。
F1000Res. 2021 Jun 14;10:470. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.52997.2. eCollection 2021.
4
Validation of a Short Questionnaire to Assess Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of Asynchronous Telemedicine Services: The Catalan Version of the Health Optimum Telemedicine Acceptance Questionnaire.验证一种用于评估医疗保健专业人员对异步远程医疗服务看法的简短问卷:健康最佳远程医疗接受问卷的加泰罗尼亚语版本。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 25;17(7):2202. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072202.
5
Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the breast cancer awareness measure (BCAM) questionnaire.跨文化调适与验证乳腺癌认知测量表(BCAM)波斯文版本。
Cancer Med. 2018 Oct;7(10):5237-5251. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1740. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
6
[Validity, reliability, and acceptability of the brief version of the self-management knowledge, attitude, and behavior assessment scale for diabetes patients].[糖尿病患者自我管理知识、态度和行为评估量表简版的效度、信度和可接受性]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Jul 6;50(7):589-93. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2016.07.005.
7
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire in French.跨文化调适与修订后患者对减药态度问卷(rPATD)法语版的心理测量学验证。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Aug;17(8):1453-1462. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
8
First Data in the Process of Validating a Tool to Evaluate Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Healthcare Providers in Oral Care of Institutionalized Elderly Residents: Content Validity, Reliability and Pilot Study.工具验证过程中的首项数据,旨在评估医疗机构中老年人口腔护理医护人员的知识、态度和实践情况:内容效度、信度和初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 14;18(8):4145. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084145.
9
[Validity, reliability, and acceptability of the scale of knowledge, attitude, and behavior of lifestyle intervention in a diabetes high-risk population].糖尿病高危人群生活方式干预知识、态度和行为量表的效度、信度及可接受性
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Jul 6;50(7):584-8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2016.07.004.
10
Physicians' attitudes and knowledge concerning antibiotic prescription and resistance: questionnaire development and reliability.医生对抗生素处方及耐药性的态度和知识:问卷编制与信度
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jan 8;16:7. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1332-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Framing resident perceptions of diversity in GME: insights from a multi-specialty survey study.构建住院医师对毕业后医学教育中多样性的认知:一项多专业调查研究的见解
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 17;25(1):1074. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07670-1.
2
Adapted tool for the assessment of domestic violence against women in a low-income country setting: a reliability analysis.低收入国家环境下针对妇女家庭暴力评估的适配工具:可靠性分析
Int J Womens Health. 2019 Jan 30;11:65-73. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S181385. eCollection 2019.
3
A current assessment of diversity characteristics and perceptions of their importance in the surgical workforce.

本文引用的文献

1
"It is a challenge to do it the right way": an interpretive description of caregivers' experiences in caring for migrant patients in Northern Sweden.“正确地做这件事是一种挑战”:对瑞典北部照顾移民患者的护理人员的体验的阐释性描述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 29;12:433. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-433.
2
Two sides of the coin: patient and provider perceptions of health care delivery to patients from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.硬币的两面:来自文化和语言背景多样的患者和提供者对向患者提供医疗服务的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Sep 18;12:322. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-322.
3
Sweden health system review.
对外科工作人员多样性特征及其重要性认知的当前评估。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Nov;18(11):1936-43. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2598-x. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
瑞典医疗体系综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2012;14(5):1-159.
4
Construct validation of the Nurse Cultural Competence Scale: a hierarchy of abilities.护士文化能力量表的构建验证:能力层次结构。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Jun;21(11-12):1678-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03933.x. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
5
Beliefs and beyond: what can we learn from qualitative studies of lay people's understandings of cancer risk?信念与超越:从定性研究中我们能了解到普通民众对癌症风险的哪些认知?
Health Expect. 2010 Jun;13(2):113-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00601.x.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish adaptation of the Inventory for Assessing the Process of Cultural Competence Among Healthcare Professionals--Revised (IAPCC-R).《医护人员文化能力评估量表修订版(IAPCC-R)瑞典语适应性量表的心理计量学评估》。
J Transcult Nurs. 2010 Jan;21(1):55-64. doi: 10.1177/1043659609349064. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
7
Cultural competence in nursing curricula: how are we doing 20 years later?护理课程中的文化能力:20年后我们做得如何?
J Nurs Educ. 2006 Jul;45(7):243-4. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20060701-01.
8
Losing culture on the way to competence: the use and misuse of culture in medical education.在追求专业能力的过程中丢失文化:医学教育中文化的运用与误用
Acad Med. 2006 Jun;81(6):542-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000225218.15207.30.
9
Racial, cultural, and ethnic factors influencing end-of-life care.影响临终关怀的种族、文化和民族因素。
J Palliat Med. 2005;8 Suppl 1:S58-69. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.s-58.
10
Construction of a questionnaire measuring outpatients' opinion of quality of hospital consultation departments.一份用于测量门诊患者对医院咨询科室质量看法的问卷的构建。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Aug 4;2:43. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-43.