• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低收入国家环境下针对妇女家庭暴力评估的适配工具:可靠性分析

Adapted tool for the assessment of domestic violence against women in a low-income country setting: a reliability analysis.

作者信息

Semahegn Agumasie, Torpey Kwasi, Manu Abubakar, Assefa Nega, Ankomah Augustine

机构信息

Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana,

School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia,

出版信息

Int J Womens Health. 2019 Jan 30;11:65-73. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S181385. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S181385
PMID:30774451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6361225/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

One-in-three women has experienced domestic violence, which is a serious public health problem and a human right violation. Domestic violence is a common life experience among women in Ethiopia. The tool used to assess violence against women (VAW) has not been validated to assess its consistency. Cronbach's alpha (α, or coefficient alpha) is a measure of internal consistency, or reliability, that is, how closely a set of items are related as a group. Reliability is how well a test measures what it should. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate the inter-item correlation (reliability) of the tool adapted from literature.

METHODS

A community-based study was conducted in Northwestern Ethiopia between November 15, 2017 and December 31, 2017. A total of 1,269 women at their permanent place of residence (specifically at their households) were recruited using the multistage stratified systematic sampling method. A structured questionnaire was adapted from literature. Also, 12 trained female data collectors collected the data using the face-to-face interview method. Data were entered into EpiData 3.1.0 and exported to SPSS 23.0 for analysis. Descriptive statistical analysis was carried out to estimate the reliability of the response(s).

RESULTS

Overall, Cronbach's alpha was higher than the minimum recommended value of 0.70. Cronbach's alpha for specific sections were 0.764 for women's decision-making autonomy (13 items); women's accepting attitude toward justified wife-beating (five items, 0.894); physical violence (seven items, 0.876); psychological violence (15 items, 0.925); sexual violence (five items, 0.812); and inequitable gender-norms (seven items, 0.867).

CONCLUSION

The tool used to assess domestic VAW in Northwestern Ethiopia had a high reliability. Therefore, researchers can adapt the tool and further assess its reliability in other settings to have a common and validated tool to study VAW in a low-income countries.

摘要

背景

三分之一的女性曾遭受家庭暴力,这是一个严重的公共卫生问题,也是对人权的侵犯。家庭暴力是埃塞俄比亚女性常见的生活经历。用于评估针对妇女暴力行为(VAW)的工具尚未经过验证以评估其一致性。克朗巴哈系数(α,或系数阿尔法)是衡量内部一致性或可靠性的指标,即一组项目作为一个整体的相关程度。可靠性是指测试衡量其应衡量内容的程度。因此,本研究的目的是估计从文献中改编的该工具的项目间相关性(可靠性)。

方法

2017年11月15日至2017年12月31日在埃塞俄比亚西北部进行了一项基于社区的研究。使用多阶段分层系统抽样方法,在她们的常住地(具体是在她们家中)共招募了1269名女性。从文献中改编了一份结构化问卷。此外,12名经过培训的女性数据收集者采用面对面访谈法收集数据。数据录入EpiData 3.1.0并导出到SPSS 23.0进行分析。进行描述性统计分析以估计回答的可靠性。

结果

总体而言,克朗巴哈系数高于建议的最低值0.70。特定部分的克朗巴哈系数分别为:女性决策自主权(13项,0.764);女性对合理殴打妻子的接受态度(5项,0.894);身体暴力(7项,0.876);心理暴力(15项,0.925);性暴力(5项,0.812);以及不平等的性别规范(7项,0.867)。

结论

用于评估埃塞俄比亚西北部家庭中针对妇女暴力行为的工具具有较高的可靠性。因此,研究人员可以采用该工具并在其他环境中进一步评估其可靠性,以获得一个通用且经过验证的工具来研究低收入国家的针对妇女暴力行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b77/6361225/d2af9c17fecd/ijwh-11-065Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b77/6361225/d2af9c17fecd/ijwh-11-065Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b77/6361225/d2af9c17fecd/ijwh-11-065Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Adapted tool for the assessment of domestic violence against women in a low-income country setting: a reliability analysis.低收入国家环境下针对妇女家庭暴力评估的适配工具:可靠性分析
Int J Womens Health. 2019 Jan 30;11:65-73. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S181385. eCollection 2019.
2
Community based intervention to prevent domestic violence against women in the reproductive age in Northwestern Ethiopia: a protocol for quasi-experimental study.以社区为基础的干预措施预防埃塞俄比亚西北部育龄期妇女遭受家庭暴力:准实验研究方案。
Reprod Health. 2017 Nov 21;14(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0414-2.
3
Designing and validation of a reproductive health need assessment tool for women experienced domestic violence.设计和验证一种针对经历过家庭暴力的女性的生殖健康需求评估工具。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jan 29;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01342-9.
4
Socioeconomic and Demographic Factors Influencing Women's Attitude Toward Wife Beating in Ethiopia.影响埃塞俄比亚妇女对家暴态度的社会经济和人口因素。
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Aug;34(15):3290-3316. doi: 10.1177/0886260519842179. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
5
Wife beating refusal among women of reproductive age in urban and rural Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚城乡育龄妇女中对殴打妻子行为的拒绝情况
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017 Mar 16;17(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12914-017-0115-5.
6
Psychometric Properties of a Screening Instrument for Domestic Violence in a Sample of Iranian Women.伊朗女性样本中家庭暴力筛查工具的心理测量特性
Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2016 Mar 5;5(1):e27763. doi: 10.17795/nmsjournal27763. eCollection 2016 Mar.
7
Women's perceptions of their community's social norms towards assisting women who have experienced intimate partner violence.妇女对其所在社区协助曾遭受亲密伴侣暴力的妇女的社会规范的看法。
J Urban Health. 2011 Apr;88(2):240-53. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9546-9.
8
[French validation of the Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression scale (AMMSA) and experience of close relationships with students and perpetrators of domestic violence].[《性侵犯现代神话接受量表》(AMMSA)的法语验证以及与学生和家庭暴力施暴者亲密关系的体验]
Encephale. 2021 Dec;47(6):554-563. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.11.010. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
9
The prevalence and predictors of domestic violence among pregnant women in Southeast Oromia, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚东南奥罗米亚孕妇家庭暴力的流行率及预测因素。
Reprod Health. 2019 Mar 25;16(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0694-9.
10
Validity and reliability of the Malay version of WHO Women's Health and Life Experiences Questionnaire.马来文版世界卫生组织妇女健康和生活经历问卷的有效性和可靠性。
J Interpers Violence. 2013 Aug;28(12):2557-80. doi: 10.1177/0886260513479029. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving dimensions of women's empowerment in India.印度妇女赋权的不断发展维度。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 11;20(7):e0327494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327494. eCollection 2025.
2
Inequitable gender norms and its associated factors among university students in southern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study, 2022.埃塞俄比亚南部大学生中不公平的性别规范及其相关因素:一项横断面研究,2022年
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 19;12:1462782. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1462782. eCollection 2024.
3
Intimate partner violence against women among contraceptive users at a primary health care setting in Southern Ethiopia: a facility-based cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Community based intervention to prevent domestic violence against women in the reproductive age in Northwestern Ethiopia: a protocol for quasi-experimental study.以社区为基础的干预措施预防埃塞俄比亚西北部育龄期妇女遭受家庭暴力:准实验研究方案。
Reprod Health. 2017 Nov 21;14(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0414-2.
2
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
3
Domestic violence and its associated factors among married women of a village development committee of rural Nepal.
在埃塞俄比亚南部的一个初级医疗保健机构中,针对避孕使用者的亲密伴侣暴力侵害妇女行为:一项基于设施的横断面研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03450-z.
4
Associated factors of diet quality among people living with HIV/AIDS in Ghana.加纳艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者饮食质量的相关因素。
BMC Nutr. 2024 Jun 21;10(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40795-024-00898-y.
5
Magnitude of self-harm and associated factors among postnatal mothers attending immunization clinics at public health facilities in Boneya Boshe Woreda, Western Ethiopia, 2023: institution-based cross-sectional study design.2023 年,在埃塞俄比亚西部博尼雅博舍行政区的公共卫生设施的免疫接种诊所有产后母亲进行自我伤害及其相关因素的幅度:基于机构的横断面研究设计。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 16;12:1384688. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1384688. eCollection 2024.
6
Extended postpartum intimate partner violence and its associated factors: community-based cross-sectional study design.延伸产后亲密伴侣暴力及其相关因素:基于社区的横断面研究设计。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Sep 20;23(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02649-w.
7
Gender-Based Violence and Associated Factors Among Women with Disabilities in Jimma Town, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚吉马镇残疾妇女中的性别暴力及相关因素
Int J Womens Health. 2022 Oct 26;14:1531-1545. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S380233. eCollection 2022.
8
Risk Assessment Instruments for Intimate Partner Femicide: A Systematic Review.亲密伴侣杀妻风险评估工具:系统评价
Front Psychol. 2022 May 31;13:896901. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896901. eCollection 2022.
9
Prevalence and its predictors of intimate partner violence against pregnant women amid COVID-19 pandemic in Southwest Ethiopia, 2021: A cross-sectional study.2021年埃塞俄比亚西南部新冠疫情期间亲密伴侣对孕妇暴力行为的患病率及其预测因素:一项横断面研究
SAGE Open Med. 2022 Feb 21;10:20503121221079317. doi: 10.1177/20503121221079317. eCollection 2022.
10
Prevalence and Associated Factors of Intimate Partner Violence Among Married Women During COVID-19 Pandemic Restrictions: A Community-Based Study.新冠疫情限制期间已婚女性中亲密伴侣暴力的流行情况及相关因素:一项基于社区的研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jun;37(11-12):NP8632-NP8650. doi: 10.1177/0886260520976222. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
尼泊尔农村一个村发展委员会已婚妇女中的家庭暴力及其相关因素
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Mar 19;9:178. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1986-6.
4
Determinants of intimate partner violence during pregnancy among married women in Abay Chomen district, Western Ethiopia: a community based cross sectional study.埃塞俄比亚西部阿贝乔门地区已婚妇女孕期亲密伴侣暴力行为的决定因素:一项基于社区的横断面研究
BMC Womens Health. 2016 Mar 10;16:16. doi: 10.1186/s12905-016-0294-6.
5
Spousal Violence in 5 Transitional Countries: A Population-Based Multilevel Analysis of Individual and Contextual Factors.五个转型国家的配偶暴力:基于人群的个体因素与环境因素的多层次分析
Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105(11):e12-22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302779. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
6
Domestic violence against women and associated factors in Ethiopia; systematic review.埃塞俄比亚针对妇女的家庭暴力及其相关因素;系统综述
Reprod Health. 2015 Aug 29;12:78. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0072-1.
7
Intimate partner violence against women in Nepal: an analysis through individual, empowerment, family and societal level factors.尼泊尔针对女性的亲密伴侣暴力行为:基于个人、赋权、家庭及社会层面因素的分析
J Res Health Sci. 2014 Autumn;14(4):251-7.
8
Assessing the Risk of Intimate Partner Violence in the Chinese Population: The Chinese Risk Assessment Tool for Perpetrator (CRAT-P).评估中国人群中亲密伴侣暴力的风险:中国施暴者风险评估工具(CRAT-P)。
Violence Against Women. 2014 May;20(5):500-516. doi: 10.1177/1077801214535107. Epub 2014 May 18.
9
Does gender inequity increase the risk of intimate partner violence among women? Evidence from a national Bangladeshi sample.性别不平等会增加女性遭受亲密伴侣暴力的风险吗?来自孟加拉国全国样本的证据。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 23;8(12):e82423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082423. eCollection 2013.
10
Domestic violence and its predictors among married women in reproductive age in Fagitalekoma Woreda, Awi zone, Amhara regional state, North Western Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚北部阿姆哈拉地区法基塔莱科马区法吉塔莱科马市育龄已婚妇女中的家庭暴力及其预测因素。
Reprod Health. 2013 Dec 5;10:63. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-63.