Spire Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Rheumatol Int. 2013 Oct;33(10):2529-38. doi: 10.1007/s00296-013-2760-x. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
A conservative management strategy for knee osteoarthritis is the lateral wedge insole (LWI). The theoretical basis for this intervention is to correct tibiofemoral malalignment, thereby reducing pain and optimising function. This systematic review evaluates the evidence on the effectiveness and safety of LWI for the treatment for knee osteoarthritis. A systematic review was performed, searching published (MEDLINE, AMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library) and unpublished literature from their inception to August 2012. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included that compared the use of LWI with a neutral insole or control intervention for people with medial compartment osteoarthritis. Risk of bias and clinical relevance were assessed, and outcomes were analysed through meta-analysis. From a total of 3,105 citations, 10 studies adhered to the a priori eligibility criteria. These included 1,095 people; 535 participants were allocated to receive LWI insoles compared to 509 in control groups. Eight per cent of papers were of high quality with low risk of bias. There was no statistically significant difference between LWI and neutral insoles for pain, function, analgesic requirement, compliance or complications (p ≥ 0.07). Those who received LWI demonstrated lower non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug requirements (p < 0.001). To conclude, there is limited evidence to support the prescription of LWI to people with medial compartment osteoarthritis to reduce pain and increase function. However, there remains a paucity of evidence to determine whether LWI outcomes differ in subgroups of the patients, such as severe compared to mild osteoarthritis, obese patients, or whether the angle of LWI is of clinical importance.
对于膝骨关节炎的保守治疗策略是外侧楔形鞋垫(LWI)。这种干预的理论基础是纠正胫股对线不良,从而减轻疼痛并优化功能。本系统评价评估了 LWI 治疗膝骨关节炎的有效性和安全性的证据。系统检索了从文献发表开始到 2012 年 8 月发表的(MEDLINE、AMED、EMBASE、CINAHL、Cochrane Library)和未发表的文献。纳入了比较 LWI 与中性鞋垫或对照组治疗内侧间室骨关节炎患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。评估了偏倚风险和临床相关性,并通过荟萃分析分析了结果。从总共 3105 条引用中,有 10 项研究符合事先设定的纳入标准。这些研究共纳入 1095 人;535 名参与者被分配接受 LWI 鞋垫治疗,而对照组有 509 名。8%的论文质量较高,偏倚风险低。LWI 与中性鞋垫在疼痛、功能、镇痛需求、依从性或并发症方面无统计学差异(p≥0.07)。接受 LWI 的患者需要的非甾体抗炎药较少(p<0.001)。总之,有有限的证据支持为内侧间室骨关节炎患者开具 LWI 处方以减轻疼痛和增加功能。然而,仍缺乏证据来确定 LWI 的结果是否在患者的亚组中有所不同,例如与轻度骨关节炎相比的重度骨关节炎、肥胖患者,或者 LWI 的角度是否具有临床意义。