University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):370-83. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486513. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
The current article reports on the development, psychometric properties, and external validity of an informant-report form of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (the PID-5-IRF). Using data from two nationally representative samples, as well as an elevated-risk community sample, we report on the PID-5-IRF item characteristics, scale properties, superordinate factor structure, and correlations with other measures. The PID-5-IRF replicates the factor structure of the self-report form and has relationships with other measures (including the PID-5 self-report form and a widely used Big Five measure) that are consistent with previous research and theory. We believe that the PID-5-IRF is a useful measure for a number of scenarios, such as when additional sources of information are desired, where informant measures are expected to provide incremental validity over self-report, where relationships or social perception is a focal interest, or when response bias is a salient concern. Areas for future research are also discussed.
本文报告了人格障碍诊断与统计手册第 5 版(PD-5)简式报告形式(PID-5-IRF)的编制、心理测量学特性和外部有效性。使用来自两个全国代表性样本以及一个高风险社区样本的数据,我们报告了 PID-5-IRF 的项目特征、量表特性、上位因子结构以及与其他测量工具的相关性。PID-5-IRF 复制了自报告形式的因子结构,并且与其他测量工具(包括 PID-5 自报告形式和广泛使用的大五人格测量工具)具有一致性,这些测量工具与先前的研究和理论一致。我们相信,PID-5-IRF 在许多情况下都是一种有用的测量工具,例如当需要额外的信息来源时,当期望知情者测量工具比自报告提供更多的增量有效性时,当关系或社会感知是关注焦点时,或者当反应偏差是一个明显关注点时。还讨论了未来的研究领域。