Suppr超能文献

在一般实践中,通常无法实现清晨和稳定的 24 小时动态血压控制:来自 SURGE 观察性研究的结果。

Morning and smooth 24-h ambulatory blood pressure control is not achieved in general practice: results from the SURGE observational study.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, St Luca Hospital, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2013 Mar;31(3):616-23; discussion 623. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835ca8bf.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this large-scale, practice-based observational study [Survey with HBPM and ABPM Under Real clinical conditions in General practice to Evaluate BP control in the early morning (SURGE)] was to ascertain the degree of morning and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) control in hypertensive patients.

METHODS

Hypertensive patients [with uncontrolled clinic blood pressure (BP) >140/90 mmHg at screening] from nine different countries were included. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed over 24 h at 15-min intervals during the day and at 20-min intervals during the night. Assessments included morning (0600-1159 h) and daytime ABP control (BP < 135/85 mmHg), and 24-h ABP control, which was set at levels less than 125/80 mmHg (ESH/ESC guidelines) and less than 130/80 mmHg (USA guidelines).

RESULTS

A total of 3312 patients were enrolled [mean clinic BP: 153 ± 17/91 ± 10 mmHg; mean 24-h and morning ABP: 130 ± 15/77 ± 10 mmHg and 134 ± 16/80 ± 11 mmHg, respectively; antihypertensive use: 72.7% (n = 2409)]. Morning and daytime (period of activity) ABP control was observed in 45.2 and 47.4% of treated patients, respectively; 24-h ABP control was only achieved in 34.6% (ESH/ESC guidelines) and 44.7% (USA guidelines) of treated patients. There was 'poor agreement' between clinic BP and ABP regarding BP control as shown by a negative (≤0) κ coefficient in treated patients. Clinic BP control (<130/80 mmHg) and morning ABP control (<135/85 mmHg) was observed in 2.3 and 45.1% of diabetic patients, and in 2.4 and 43.6% of patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Morning ABP control was 42.3% in patients with high/very high cardiovascular risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinic BP, morning and 24-h ABP control rates were low in treated hypertensive patients, including those with comorbidities, such as diabetes or LVH.

摘要

背景

本大规模、基于实践的观察性研究[在一般实践中使用 HBPM 和 ABPM 进行调查以评估清晨血压控制(SURGE)]的目的是确定高血压患者清晨和 24 小时动态血压(ABP)控制的程度。

方法

从九个不同国家纳入血压未得到控制的高血压患者[诊室血压(BP)>140/90mmHg 时筛查]。在白天每隔 15 分钟和夜间每隔 20 分钟进行 24 小时动态血压监测。评估包括清晨(0600-1159 小时)和白天 ABP 控制(BP<135/85mmHg),以及 24 小时 ABP 控制,设定为低于 125/80mmHg(ESH/ESC 指南)和低于 130/80mmHg(美国指南)。

结果

共纳入 3312 例患者[平均诊室 BP:153±17/91±10mmHg;平均 24 小时和清晨 ABP:130±15/77±10mmHg 和 134±16/80±11mmHg;降压药物使用率:72.7%(n=2409)]。接受治疗的患者中,分别有 45.2%和 47.4%达到清晨和白天(活动期)ABP 控制;仅 34.6%(ESH/ESC 指南)和 44.7%(美国指南)的接受治疗患者达到 24 小时 ABP 控制。接受治疗的患者中,诊室 BP 与 ABP 之间的血压控制呈负相关(≤0),κ 系数为负值,表明两者之间存在“较差的一致性”。在糖尿病患者中,诊室 BP 控制(<130/80mmHg)和清晨 ABP 控制(<135/85mmHg)的发生率分别为 2.3%和 45.1%,左心室肥厚(LVH)患者的发生率分别为 2.4%和 43.6%。在心血管风险高/极高的患者中,清晨 ABP 控制率为 42.3%。

结论

包括合并糖尿病或 LVH 等并发症的高血压患者在内,接受治疗的高血压患者的诊室 BP、清晨和 24 小时 ABP 控制率均较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验