• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科注册护士的分诊评估

Triage assessment of registered nurses in the emergency department.

作者信息

Vatnøy Torunn Kitty, Fossum Mariann, Smith Nina, Slettebø Shild

机构信息

Department of Health and Nursing Science, University of Agder, Grimstad, Norway.

出版信息

Int Emerg Nurs. 2013 Apr;21(2):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2012.06.004
PMID:23615515
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Standardised triage systems have been implemented in emergency departments (EDs) to improve the efficacy of assessment strategies as performed by registered nurses (RNs). However, the exact effect the standardised triage systems have on the decision-making process remains unclear.

AIM

To evaluate decision making in the triage setting before and after implementation of the Medical Emergency Triage and Treatment System Adult in one hospital's ED.

METHODS

A descriptive intervention design with a quantitative approach. A total of 655 patients before and 413 patients after the intervention were included. A questionnaire was used to evaluate how the RNs assessed the patients before intervention while the emergency patient records were used for data collection after intervention.

RESULTS

Before the intervention, a majority of the assessments were founded on signs and symptoms and medical diagnoses, whereas vital parameters were rarely used. After the intervention, nearly two thirds of the patients were assessed according to a triage system with vital parameters and standardised algorithm for symptoms and signs included in the assessment procedure.

CONCLUSION

Implementing a standardised triage system, including vital parameters and standardised algorithms for signs and symptoms, increased the use of vital parameters and signs and symptoms for decision making and acuity assignment.

摘要

未标注

急诊部门(EDs)已实施标准化分诊系统,以提高注册护士(RNs)执行评估策略的效率。然而,标准化分诊系统对决策过程的确切影响仍不明确。

目的

评估一家医院急诊部门实施成人医疗紧急分诊与治疗系统前后分诊环境中的决策情况。

方法

采用定量方法的描述性干预设计。干预前共纳入655例患者,干预后纳入413例患者。干预前使用问卷评估注册护士对患者的评估方式,干预后使用急诊患者记录进行数据收集。

结果

干预前,大多数评估基于体征和症状以及医学诊断,而生命体征参数很少使用。干预后,近三分之二的患者根据包含生命体征参数以及评估程序中症状和体征标准化算法的分诊系统进行评估。

结论

实施包括生命体征参数以及症状和体征标准化算法的标准化分诊系统,增加了在决策和 acuity 分配中对生命体征参数以及症状和体征的使用。 (注:“acuity”这里可能是“急症程度”之类的意思,结合语境不太明确准确意思,未做更精准翻译)

相似文献

1
Triage assessment of registered nurses in the emergency department.急诊科注册护士的分诊评估
Int Emerg Nurs. 2013 Apr;21(2):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
2
Thinking strategies used by Registered Nurses during emergency department triage.注册护士在急诊科分诊时使用的思维策略。
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jan;61(2):163-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04473.x.
3
Explicating nurses' cardiac triage decisions.解读护士的心脏分诊决策。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):50-7. doi: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000317474.50424.4f.
4
Triage in emergency departments: national survey.急诊科的分诊:全国性调查。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Oct;14(9):1067-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01191.x.
5
Accuracy and concordance of nurses in emergency department triage.急诊科分诊护士的准确性与一致性。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2005 Dec;19(4):432-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00372.x.
6
Emergency department triage: is there a link between nurses' personal characteristics and accuracy in triage decisions?急诊科分诊:护士的个人特征与分诊决策准确性之间存在关联吗?
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Apr;14(2):83-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.12.001. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
7
Calibrating urgency: triage decision-making in a pediatric emergency department.校准紧急程度:儿科急诊科的分诊决策
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Nov;13(4):503-20. doi: 10.1007/s10459-007-9062-6. Epub 2007 Mar 16.
8
Safety of telephone consultation for "non-serious" emergency ambulance service patients.“非重症”紧急救护服务患者电话咨询的安全性
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):363-73. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.363.
9
Factors that influence the accuracy of triage nurses' judgement in emergency departments.影响急诊科分诊护士判断准确性的因素。
Emerg Med J. 2010 Jun;27(6):451-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.059311.
10
Comparison of triage assessments among pediatric registered nurses and pediatric emergency physicians.儿科注册护士与儿科急诊医生分诊评估的比较。
Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Dec;9(12):1397-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01608.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A virtual-based educational intervention for nurses about trauma patients triage: A mixed-method study protocol.一项针对护士的关于创伤患者分诊的虚拟教育干预:一项混合方法研究方案。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Jul 4;14:252. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_121_24. eCollection 2025.
2
A new Bayesian method for the estimation of emergency nurses' thresholds and agreement in the context of telephone triage.一种用于在电话分诊背景下估计急诊护士阈值和一致性的新贝叶斯方法。
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 4;16:1477844. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1477844. eCollection 2025.
3
An Effective Triage Education Method for Triage Nurses: An Overview and Update.
一种针对分诊护士的有效分诊教育方法:概述与更新
Open Access Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 11;17:105-112. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S498085. eCollection 2025.
4
Factors Associated with School Nurses' Triage Competency in South Korea.韩国学校护士分诊能力的相关因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 5;18(16):8279. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168279.
5
An epidemiological study of a patient population, triage category allocations and principal diagnosis within the emergency centres of a private healthcare group in the Emirate of Dubai, United Arab Emirates.阿拉伯联合酋长国迪拜酋长国一家私立医疗集团急诊中心内患者群体、分诊类别分配及主要诊断的流行病学研究。
Nurs Open. 2020 May 26;7(5):1468-1474. doi: 10.1002/nop2.518. eCollection 2020 Sep.
6
Inter-Rater Agreement of Emergency Nurses and Physicians in Emergency Severity Index (ESI) Triage.急诊护士与医生在急诊严重程度指数(ESI)分诊中的评分者间一致性
Emerg (Tehran). 2014 Fall;2(4):158-61.