School of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Environ Monit Assess. 2013 Oct;185(10):8583-600. doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3197-0. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
We propose a framework in which thresholds of potential concern (TPCs) and limits of acceptable change (LACs) are used in concert in the assessment of wetland condition and vulnerability and apply the framework in a case study. The lower Murrumbidgee River floodplain (the 'Lowbidgee') is one of the most ecologically important wetlands in Australia and the focus of intense management intervention by State and Federal government agencies. We used a targeted management stakeholder workshop to identify key values that contribute to the ecological significance of the Lowbidgee floodplain, and identified LACs that, if crossed, would signify the loss of significance. We then used conceptual models linking the condition of these values (wetland vegetation communities, waterbirds, fish species and the endangered southern bell frog) to measurable threat indicators, for which we defined a management goal and a TPC. We applied this framework to data collected across 70 wetland storages', or eco-hydrological units, at the peak of a prolonged drought (2008) and following extensive re-flooding (2010). At the suggestion of water and wetland mangers, we neither aggregated nor integrated indices but reported separately in a series of chloropleth maps. The resulting assessment clearly identified the effect of rewetting in restoring indicators within TPC in most cases, for most storages. The scale of assessment was useful in informing the targeted and timely management intervention and provided a context for retaining and utilising monitoring information in an adaptive management context.
我们提出了一个框架,其中将潜在关注阈值(TPCs)和可接受变化极限(LACs)协同用于湿地状况和脆弱性评估,并在案例研究中应用该框架。下默伦比奇河洪泛平原(“Lowbidgee”)是澳大利亚最重要的湿地之一,也是州和联邦政府机构进行密集管理干预的焦点。我们使用有针对性的管理利益相关者研讨会来确定有助于 Lowbidgee 洪泛平原生态重要性的关键价值,并确定了如果超出 LACs 就会失去重要性的极限。然后,我们使用将这些价值的状况(湿地植被群落、水鸟、鱼类物种和濒危的南方铃蛙)与可衡量的威胁指标联系起来的概念模型,为这些指标定义了管理目标和 TPC。我们将该框架应用于在长期干旱(2008 年)高峰期和广泛重新泛滥(2010 年)后,在 70 个湿地水库(或生态水文单位)收集的数据。根据水和湿地管理者的建议,我们没有汇总或整合指标,而是在一系列色阶地图中分别报告。评估结果清楚地表明,在大多数情况下,大多数水库中的重新湿地化恢复了 TPC 内的指标。评估的规模有助于有针对性和及时的管理干预,并为保留和利用自适应管理背景下的监测信息提供了背景。