Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 May;55(5):507-13. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31827ee018.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the most common, costly, and disabling occupational injuries. Objectives included determining whether work-related TBI could be reliably identified using the Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System (OIICS) and describing challenges in developing an OIICS-based TBI case definition.
Washington State trauma registry reports and workers' compensation claims were linked (1998 to 2008). Trauma registry diagnoses were used as the gold standard for six OIICS-based TBI case definitions.
The OIICS-based case definitions were highly specific but had low sensitivity, capturing less than a third of fatal and nonfatal TBI.
The use of OIICS versus International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification codes underestimated TBI and changed the attributable cause distribution, with potential implications for prevention efforts. Surveillance methods that can more fully and accurately capture the impact of work-related TBI across the United States are needed.
颅脑损伤(TBI)是最常见、最昂贵和最致残的职业性损伤之一。目的包括确定使用职业伤害和疾病分类系统(OIICS)是否能可靠地识别与工作相关的 TBI,并描述基于 OIICS 的 TBI 病例定义开发中的挑战。
将华盛顿州创伤登记报告和工人赔偿索赔联系起来(1998 年至 2008 年)。创伤登记诊断被用作六种基于 OIICS 的 TBI 病例定义的金标准。
基于 OIICS 的病例定义具有很高的特异性,但敏感性较低,仅捕获不到三分之一的致命和非致命性 TBI。
与使用国际疾病分类-第九修订临床修正版代码相比,OIICS 的使用低估了 TBI,并改变了可归因病因的分布,这可能对预防工作产生影响。需要使用能够更全面和准确地捕捉全美国与工作相关的 TBI 影响的监测方法。